Forums
›
Aliens: Colonial Marines Forum
›
Aliens: Colonial Marines PC Forum
›
The reviews/scores on this game are outr ...
The reviews/scores on this game are outright ridiculous.
This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.
- Feb 22, 2013 11:41 pm GMTFrom: omanojyaku | #040
The lesson that few people learn is to not buy anything form this dev/pub at full price ever again.
No, the lesson is don't pre-order or buy anything until you've checked it out. Gearbox has done some really good games, so there's no reason to write them off, just always make sure you've got a pretty good idea what you're getting instead of running out to grab it on day one just because it says Aliens on the cover.
---
"I can't buy a pack of smokes without running into 9 guys you've ****ed!" - Feb 23, 2013 3:40 pm GMTI would agree if the demo was a accurate representation of the full retail game.
Whether that is the case is up for debate.
If not, that is bait and switch. That is a tactic that should not be rewarded with revenue.
---
XBL:Amanojyaku BatttleTag:ViolateThis#(1752)
Ragequitters should be permabanned. Trolls so pathetic and stupid I had to break comm with: 1 - Feb 23, 2013 10:25 pm GMT^Read reviews, watch gameplay videos, talk to people who've played it, play the demo if there is one, then decide if it sounds like something you'd like. Don't just auto pass on a game because you didn't like that last one that developer made, that's no better than dashing out to buy a game at launch only knowing its about Aliens.
---
"I can't buy a pack of smokes without running into 9 guys you've ****ed!" - Feb 24, 2013 8:45 pm GMTWe agree, this game is much fun (playing the 360 version) but also going to buy the pc version.
And that nice.
---
Don't hate us because we're beautiful...Don't be a Donkey. - Feb 25, 2013 5:11 am GMTMogan posted...
^Read reviews, watch gameplay videos, talk to people who've played it, play the demo if there is one, then decide if it sounds like something you'd like. Don't just auto pass on a game because you didn't like that last one that developer made, that's no better than dashing out to buy a game at launch only knowing its about Aliens.
Yes, watch gameplay videos but I have to say, if I were to read reviews I'd still be playing Pong (maybe a slight exaggeration). I seem to like the games everybody hates.
---
The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. - Feb 25, 2013 6:01 am GMTFrom: Pailhead | #045
Yes, watch gameplay videos but I have to say, if I were to read reviews I'd still be playing Pong (maybe a slight exaggeration). I seem to like the games everybody hates.
Well, you don't read reviews for their scores or opinions, you read them for information about the game so you can make better decisions about what games sound fun to you.
---
"I can't buy a pack of smokes without running into 9 guys you've ****ed!" - Mar 2, 2013 10:35 am GMTWatching Gameplay Videos doesn't help to get the feel of the game. Especially if you see the wrong one. The E3 Demo from last year looks about a million times better than what we got, and many people bought it based on that. The research argument holds no water (particularly in the case of pre orders), especially since many trusted publications were hyping the living s*** out of this only to can it the day it hit shelves.
Reading reviews and watching gameplay doesn't always give a consumer the right idea in general. I've seen games that were utter garbage get 10/10 or 9/10 reviews on a consistent basis. I mean, there was even one review source that gave THIS 9/10, when it's clearly a 6 at its very best if you're generous.
Really folks, there is simply no reason to defend these sort of practices as if it were okay. Releasing unfinished, unpolished, buggy as hell games is not okay. Especially when it's happened before (with Duke Nukem Forever). I don't care if Gearbox wasn't the only company at fault here. Clearly, they were careless and let it go to s*** under their watch. Not to mention the rumors that they took money that was supposed to go towards this game and put it towards Borderlands 2.
They were in charge of releasing the game; its no one elses responsibility but theirs to put out a quality product, outsourced or not. There is not a valid excuse for this garbage.
I would not want anything to do with Gearbox after this fiasco if I were Sega (or any other company for that matter).
---
What's the matter? You can't stand the balls of a strong Nord woman? - Mar 2, 2013 10:17 pm GMTFrom: GTAfan421 | #047
Releasing unfinished, unpolished, buggy as hell games is not okay.
Who said it was?
Regardless of what gets released or how though, what you buy is still your responsibility. I didn't dash out and buy Colonial Marines, because I went looking for information on it and didn't like what I found. I don't have any special powers, so I figure other gamers can do the same.
We'd all love it if developers and publishers never put out a half finished game, but we also have zero input on their decision to do so, and frankly ... there's nothing saying that they can't. Sega's going to do whatever it thinks is in its best interest, even if it's not in ours, so its up to us to pay attention to what we buy. I'd rather be able to just trust that every publisher will only release completely finished, polished, 100% working games ... but obviously things don't work that way.
The "research argument" isn't for justifying **** games, it's for gamers being as aware as possible of what they're buying before they buy it.
---
"I can't buy a pack of smokes without running into 9 guys you've ****ed!" - Mar 3, 2013 7:21 pm GMTMogan posted...
The "research argument" isn't for justifying **** games, it's for gamers being as aware as possible of what they're buying before they buy it.
The thing is, everyone who pre ordered under the impression that the game was the same game they saw from E3 last year was boned... greatly.
And that's exactly my point here.
I had seen that and pre ordered under the same impression that many others had... The impression that this would be the first FPS with a full length Marine campaign, suspenseful and immersive gameplay (at the least) with some awesome co op and multiplayer. Instead we got very dated graphics on consoles (okay vanilla graphics on PC), okay at best gameplay, garbage AI... and the list goes on.
The research was not helpful in the cases of the thousands and thousands of people who had pre ordered this game thinking it would be the FPS to play in 2013. In fact, looking it up actually made things worse (for the pre order people) by leading us in the completely wrong direction. For example, how many videos were out with in depth gameplay coverage of A:CM aside of the 2012 E3 gameplay demo prior to launch?
Very few (if any) with the kind of depth that that E3 Demo had featured.
And that's my point. Many of the people who actually bought this game never even had the chance to do any real research because there was nothing to research. And what there was never showed any signs that the game would be this bad.
---
What's the matter? You can't stand the balls of a strong Nord woman? - Mar 3, 2013 8:39 pm GMTFrom: GTAfan421 | #049
The thing is, everyone who pre ordered under the impression that the game was the same game they saw from E3 last year was boned... greatly. ... Many of the people who actually bought this game never even had the chance to do any real research because there was nothing to research. And what there was never showed any signs that the game would be this bad.
That's a danger of pre-ordering, you don't really know what you're getting because all you've seen is marketing material specifically designed to make the game look as good as possible. If you pre-order a game, you're accepting the risk that it will be crap.
Like I said, it'd be great if we could rush out and buy any game on day one, knowing whatever impressions we got from its first trailer/demo/whatever were accurate and the game was whole and polished, but that isn't how the industry works and it's not a new phenomena. The only way gamers can control how publishers do business is to be careful what we buy, and I'll bet a lot of those folks who pre-ordered Colonial Marines wont be pre-ordering as many games from now on, and I'll bet they don't get burns as often or as badly either.
---
"I can't buy a pack of smokes without running into 9 guys you've ****ed!" - Mar 14, 2013 7:58 pm GMTReviews on the Run just gave this a 0.0 and a 0.5 score. =P
---
PSN Name: FFATMA - Mar 19, 2013 7:56 am GMTFFATMA posted...
Reviews on the Run just gave this a 0.0 and a 0.5 score. =P
Second one is too high.I went to High Hrothgar once...place was a real sausage fest. -Unknown poster - Mar 26, 2013 8:21 am GMTI liked it, at release it would have received a 6/10 from me, not what it was cracked up to be, downgraded visuals and a couple things were stripped from final release (because what game in recent history HASNT done that) but MP has been fun seeing as that is the focus of this game, the level design is authentic if even could have used a couple visual upgrades, the customization options are neat and the story focuses on the colonial marines, has Aliens, and if people forgot about Wey Yu's involvement in wanting to get live specimens for study, why WOULDNT they be in this game? For all intents and purposes they chose that planet to colonize and to study the aliens, they want to keep the Colonial Marines unaware of this...it all makes sense, but people complain about it? The characters werent as likable as the Aliens cast, but thats nostalgia talking, noone is going to be as likable as Hicks, Hudson and Vasquez.
Post patch I'd upgrade my score to a 7/10 due to the improvements.
Thats another thing I want to talk about, most reviews are from a build that doesnt exist anymore now that its being patched, so technically all the scores are outdated and meaningless, yet metacritic will forever show a 44 because the system is outdated and broken, review scores are from a time when console games were as released, forever, no patching no hotfixes nothing. It was either playable, good or not. Metacritic scores need to be fluid with patching and improvements + DLC. Scores need to change as time goes, because an entire industry should not be run on so called "professional" reviewers based on day 1 experiences alone, especially if the build is subject to be improved later.
I dont condone releasing a game that hasnt been properly tested, but if a company makes a good attempt at fixing it and actually making an enjoyable experience for people? That should be reflected. This whole ordeal with ACM is ridiculous. Gearbox may have not gone about things the best way, but a game was made, I'm glad this was not cancelled and that we have something that actually is an authentic Aliens experience even if it has a couple of warts on it.
People buy into CoD every year, can someone honestly tell me that those single player campaigns were any good? Also, The War Z received a 20 metacritic score and for some ungodly reason that has more active players....how can a game that received such negative press, had a scandal even WORSE than this game, falsely advertised a game (way more than ACM could have possibly done,if at all) and yet do better?
Simple answer.
Gamers do NOT know what they want and should NOT be trusted with the final word. - Mar 26, 2013 9:09 am GMTthemallet posted...
People do NOT know what they want and should NOT be trusted with the final word.
Fixed
That being said you ever spout that garbage around me, expect some freedom to rain down on your butt. Cuz I'm 'Merican and it's my right to whine about getting what I want, but slightly different than I envisioned! - Apr 1, 2013 9:57 am GMT[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
- Apr 1, 2013 10:25 am GMTThis isnt a bad game...unless you saw the E3 demos first. Then this is a bait and switch steaming pile of dung.
I bought this game cause it was Aliens, period. I was having a blast, went to check the reviews...wth, why? Went to see the E3 demo and this D-bag Pitchford, so full of himself and this 'awesome product' he's so sure we're all going to love...then I understood and learned two things:
1- Never pre-Order. From anyone. Ever.
2- Every single game maker will f&#k its customers, its just a matter of time:
BioWare, Blizzard, SqEnix, GearBox, Capcom...once a company makes a good game and achieves AAA status and has a good rep in the gaming community, it will only be a matter of time before they will start putting out trash, and fools will buy it 'just because' and these companies know it...
FinalFantasy has been doing it for 15 (FIFTEEN) years.
Peaked at FFVII, now whenever they need money they make some trash and put 'Final Fantasy' in front of it...fools throw their money at S/E when they hear those two words.
Diablo3- NOTHING like the demo, but fools (like me) pre-ordered cause 'its blizzard' and cause 'its diablo', so in my mind 'Blizzard is making another Diablo' was like waking from a dream, and they took all of our trusting @$$es right to the bank in pre-orders...and D3 turned out to be trash.
StreetFighter <X>: Comes out 3 times a year, each version is the LAST VERSION with a few DLCs unlocked...DLCs that are already on the disc...how stupid do Capcom thinks US gamers are? After SF4 everyone caught on and instead of buying it, they just waited 4 mos and got SFIV AE with all the unlocks included.
Anyway stop pre-ordering. Point Im making here is these game companies are taking us for suckers- when the pre-order sales drop- then we'll stop seeing re-used textures, re-used maps, tearing, and just basically lazy development. When they have to compete for our dollars, instead of us just throwing our money at them just because they made something you liked 4 yrs ago...What are they doing to earn your money this time? Some BS skin or crappy starter weapon you'll toss out after the tutorial is no longer good enough - Apr 4, 2013 12:22 pm GMTExyll posted...
This isnt a bad game...unless you saw the E3 demos first. Then this is a bait and switch steaming pile of dung.
I bought this game cause it was Aliens, period. I was having a blast, went to check the reviews...wth, why? Went to see the E3 demo and this D-bag Pitchford, so full of himself and this 'awesome product' he's so sure we're all going to love...then I understood and learned two things:
1- Never pre-Order. From anyone. Ever.
2- Every single game maker will f&#k its customers, its just a matter of time:
BioWare, Blizzard, SqEnix, GearBox, Capcom...once a company makes a good game and achieves AAA status and has a good rep in the gaming community, it will only be a matter of time before they will start putting out trash, and fools will buy it 'just because' and these companies know it...
FinalFantasy has been doing it for 15 (FIFTEEN) years.
Peaked at FFVII, now whenever they need money they make some trash and put 'Final Fantasy' in front of it...fools throw their money at S/E when they hear those two words.
Diablo3- NOTHING like the demo, but fools (like me) pre-ordered cause 'its blizzard' and cause 'its diablo', so in my mind 'Blizzard is making another Diablo' was like waking from a dream, and they took all of our trusting @$$es right to the bank in pre-orders...and D3 turned out to be trash.
StreetFighter <X>: Comes out 3 times a year, each version is the LAST VERSION with a few DLCs unlocked...DLCs that are already on the disc...how stupid do Capcom thinks US gamers are? After SF4 everyone caught on and instead of buying it, they just waited 4 mos and got SFIV AE with all the unlocks included.
Anyway stop pre-ordering. Point Im making here is these game companies are taking us for suckers- when the pre-order sales drop- then we'll stop seeing re-used textures, re-used maps, tearing, and just basically lazy development. When they have to compete for our dollars, instead of us just throwing our money at them just because they made something you liked 4 yrs ago...What are they doing to earn your money this time? Some BS skin or crappy starter weapon you'll toss out after the tutorial is no longer good enough
1.) I fully agree. I'd actually go even further and say wait for the cheaper more all inclusive GOTY editions.
2.)Ummm the demo was Act1. It was included, that's not really the case here, but yeah that's common with the others you ranted about.
Forums
›
Aliens: Colonial Marines Forum
›
Aliens: Colonial Marines PC Forum
›
The reviews/scores on this game are outr ...
Aliens: Colonial Marines
Not Following
- Publisher(s): Sega
- Developer(s): Gearbox Software
- Genre: Action
- Release:
- PEGI: 18+
Game Stats
- Game Universe:
- Aliens RPG (PS3, X360, PC),
- Aliens: Colonial Marines (X360, PS3, PC, DS, WIIU),
- Aliens: Thanatos Encounter (GBC),
- Aliens Online (PC),
- Aliens (PC),
- Aliens (1987) (C64, MSX, CPC, ZX),
- Aliens (1986) (C64, APL2),
- Aliens (AQU),
- Aliens: Colonial Marines (2000-Canceled) (PS2),
- Aliens: Unleashed (MOBILE)
- Number of Players:
1-4 Players
- Number of Online Players:
4 Players Online
- 18+ Rating Description
Aliens: Colonial Marines Navigation
Games You May Like



Neverwinter (PC)
Hard Reset (PC)
Strike Suit Zero (PC)
Retrovirus (PC)
Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.


