Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

Duke Nukem Forever Review

loading...

Game Emblems

The Bad

  1. Although not a very good game, it deserves a higher rating.

Kevin VanOrd
Posted by Kevin VanOrd, Senior Editor
on

The bland and ugly Duke Nukem Forever turns a famous gaming icon into an embarrassment.

The Good

  • It's fun to shrink enemies and stomp on them.

The Bad

  • Long, boring platforming and driving sections  
  • The shooting lacks impact  
  • Ugly visuals and jerky frame rates  
  • Short levels separated by long loading screens  
  • Fails to be shocking, sexy, or funny.

So this is what we've been waiting for, it seems: a tedious and unattractive sci-fi shooter that would quickly hit the bargain bin if it weren't called Duke Nukem Forever. Duke may be an icon, but he's just going through the motions in this stitched-together collection of poorly paced levels, which do the unimaginable: they make Duke boring. Some see the cigar-chomping alpha male as a misogynist pig; others see a clever and ironic take on macho cliches. Neither crowd is likely to get worked up over Duke's actions here. Sure, he spouts the occasional sexist quip. He receives a lap dance from a topless stripper, smacks monsters in the crotch to humiliate them, and has no problem using words beginning with the letter "f." But there's nothing sexy, provocative, or sly about his portrayal in this long-awaited sequel. In Duke Nukem Forever, there is little joy, little excitement, and little fun. That is, unless your idea of fun is to catch an occasional glimpse of digital nipples while you jump and drive around, and only occasionally shoot a few brain-dead aliens.

It's amazing how little shooting there is in this first-person shooter.

Duke Nukem Forever is a treatise on what happens when random ideas are slapped together without regard for how they fit with one another. You might spend only three or four minutes on one level, doing nothing but walking and jumping a bit, before reaching the inexcusably long loading screen that introduces the next. Other sections drag on interminably, and there are frequent stretches in which nothing is happening. The game slows to a crawl constantly. Take, for example, a series of levels in which you drive Duke's four-wheeler. In these sequences, you drive over aliens and use ramps to jump across chasms. You see a lot of the same brown canyons and cliffs in these sections, and on scripted occasions, the rover stalls and you have to get out and search for gas cans. It's nice that you get the chance to shoot some aliens amid all this bland driving. But this structure repeats itself three times in a row. The driving just goes on and on, and then on some more. And just when you think you're going to get the chance to do something different, you get in your monster truck and drive up more ramps.

That kind of pace-killing monotony is frequent in Duke Nukem Forever. You do a lot of platforming and some occasional puzzle-solving, but all of these portions are dull as dishwater. Several jumping sequences see you shrinking to action-figure height. Playing as pint-sized Duke is a neat idea, and he spews profane chatter as if he has inhaled a tank's worth of helium. ("Size only matters when you're full grown," Duke reminds us with his chipmunk voice.) But these sections drag on for ages, such as a prolonged excursion across burger patties and kitchen shelves. It's cute at first, but five minutes in, you wish it would just end. An excruciating platforming section across rotating gears is wholly un-fun. Puzzles that have you pushing orbs around on the ground turn a voyage through an alien hive into pure drudgery. Few first-person shooters are this focused on monotonous actions that don't involve shooting.

Duke Nukem Forever isn't just boring; sometimes, it's plain awful. The last 90 minutes of the game are putrid, featuring seemingly unending underwater excursions in which you swim over bubbles to catch your breath. There's only a bit of action here, and the need to constantly replenish your breath meter is frustrating--as is the ease with which you can get caught up in the environment while swimming through tunnel entrances. A level soon after has you running up a staircase as explosive barrels come rolling toward you, all while the rising water level forces you to push forward. Not fun; not even close. Furthermore, the ridiculously flippant ending that follows is an absolute insult. Duke himself says in his unenthusiastic monotone: "What kind of s*** ending is that?" So Duke knows the finale is abysmal, which means the development team(s) did too. But making a joke about it doesn't make it excusable. The game pulls the same trick earlier on, cracking wise about a boring valve-turning puzzle, but once again, Duke's claim that he hates valve puzzles doesn't make this boring and cliched task suddenly entertaining.

Every so often, you shoot some aliens. There are no surprises here: these are mostly the same foes and the same guns from Duke Nukem 3D. But the joy of that game's shooting has been flattened. Pig cops, octabrains, and so on occasionally threaten you, but they don't react much to getting shot, and they just sort of fall over when you kill them. The shooting has little sense of impact: you don't get gushers of blood or goo, only pixelated sprinkles, though there are a few decent moments when the action gels. A few shoot-outs in a ghost town require some fleet-footed movement and offer a bit of a challenge, as does a boss fight atop a dam. And it's always enjoyable to deflate an alien beast with the shrink ray and stomp on the puny thing. On the other hand, a rooftop sequence in which dropships deliver one wave of aliens after another just drags on and on. Here, and in a few other sections, it's also possible to find yourself without the right weapon for the job and have no way to replenish your ammo. It's as if the levels were designed for the old Duke, who could carry a full arsenal of guns at once. But the new Duke carries only two weapons at a time.

Kevin VanOrd
By Kevin VanOrd, Senior Editor

Kevin VanOrd is a lifelong RPG lover and violin player. When he isn't busy building PCs and composing symphonies, he watches American Dad reruns with his fat cat, Ollie.

6 comments
poiuyhjkl
poiuyhjkl like.author.displayName 1 Like

"By Kevin VanOrd, Senior Editor

Kevin VanOrd is a lifelong RPG lover and violin player. When he isn't busy building PCs and composing symphonies, he watches American Dad reruns with his fat cat, Ollie."

Dear gamespot, did you just let guy who is obviously virgin, review Duke Nukem? Dont you think thats kind of biased?

XboxGuy1537
XboxGuy1537

@poiuyhjkl Yeah the part where it said "Watches American Dad reruns with fat cat" isn't a very good sign that this person has much going LOL

Feirund
Feirund like.author.displayName 1 Like

This is what happens when you leave the reviews for amateurs. The whole thing reeks of personal opinion disguised with more complex, professional-sounding terms. The game was completely okay. You wanted Duke, you got Duke, nothing more, nothing less. I played this game after reading the mountain of negative reviews and while I didn't love the game, I gotta say it's one of the most mistreated games I've seen in my life. 

SpaceTrucker06
SpaceTrucker06

Completely agree with the review.

The orignal Duke Nukem 3D is still far more enjoyable to play even today.

I'm trying to forget that Duke Nukem Forever was ever released.

Jeremy473
Jeremy473

I dont think it was so bad. I give it some lean way only because of the stuff its been through for 13-14 years. If you actually think waiting 14yrs is going to give you a god like game, thats your own fault. I knew what to exspect and honestly everyone wanted duke, they begged and begged. Then what happens when you take a mutt game and toss it together? you get a clearly unfinished game. I give them credit for trying but if giving the fans duke (what the wanted) gets you hammered in bogus reviews then wow... I enjoyed the game but if i could go a day without the crying and negitive reviews i would have been happy waiting another 4 years for a refreshed game. I dont get it, you cry about waiting 14 years and then once you get it, you cry abou it. Duke deserves atleast a 6 out of 10.

TI99Kitty
TI99Kitty like.author.displayName 1 Like

"So this is what we've been waiting for, it seems: a tedious and unattractive sci-fi shooter that would quickly hit the bargain bin if it weren't called Duke Nukem Forever." Actually, it *did* hit the bargain bin pretty quickly. Less than 3 months after it came out, it had dropped from $59.96 to $29.96. I picked it up at Wal-Mart for $9.96 last month. From approximately $60 to $10 in less than six months is pretty fast, especially for a game that has been so hyped for close to 13 years. I wasn't about to pay $60 for it, but I almost bought it when it was $30 (money troubles kept me from buying it then). At $10, though, I have little to complain about. I find it slightly less frustrating than my favorite games, and the texture pop-in has only been noticeable once or twice. I haven't noticed any dropped framerate problems, either. My biggest complaint is that, unlike most games I play, you have to be looking *directly* at an object in order to pick it up -- as in, your reticle has to be directly on it. If you're off by a pixel or two, forget it. To sum up: if I'd paid full price for it, I'd have been demanding my money back. At $10, however, it's a fairly decent (as in, to play, not its morals) and entertaining game. I opened it up and played it for the first time yesterday, and about five hours passed before I realized it.

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Duke Nukem Forever BoxshotEnlarge the boxshot
Not Following

    Game Stats