ON TV.com: JESSICA ALBA photos
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot: TGS 2008
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
TV.com
Metacritic

Game Settings

Prey has a few settings you can tweak out of the box to improve performance at the expense of graphical quality. Aside from the usual resolution options, Prey also allows you to adjust texture-quality settings and an assortment of check-box features.

As expected, resolution scales with performance. Expect to lose more than a few frames if you want to crank up the game to 1600x1200. Texture quality, however, did not affect the performance of our GeForce 7900 GTX (of course, this video card also had 512MB of RAM built in).

Of the check-box items, we found that the Glow, Shadows, and High-Quality Particle Detail options dropped performance the most. However, we advise keeping as many of these options enabled as these settings also add a great deal to the ambience of the game. If we had to rank them in order of what to eliminate first, we'd ditch Glow, then Shadows, followed closely by High-Quality Particle Detail. The other settings affected performance, but to a far lesser extent.

Resolution Performance Tests

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

1024x768, High Quality
1280x1024, High Quality
1600x1200, High Quality

1024x768, High Quality
127
1280x1024, High Quality
97
1600x1200, High Quality
73

Settings Performance Tests

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

All Settings, Off
Shaders, High
High Quality Skinning
Specular, High
Bump Maps, Sharpened
Shadows
Glow
High Particle Detail

1280x1024, High Quality

All Settings, Off
159
Shaders, High
157
High Quality Skinning
157
Specular, High
152
Bump Maps, Sharpened
152
Shadows
148
Glow
137
High Particle Detail
123

Texture Quality Performance Tests

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

Low
Medium
High

1280x1024, Max Settings

Low
100
Medium
97
High
97

CPUs: Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800. Systems: Intel D975XBX, 1GB (512MB x 2) Corsair XMS DDR2 Memory, 160GB Seagate 7200.7 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows XP Professional SP2. Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX 512MB. Graphics Drivers: Nvidia ForceWare 91.31.




95 Comments

  • rokkuman09

    Posted Dec 23, 2007 12:10 pm GMT

    Never-named, it won't run too well. It should be playable on low settings but don't take my word for it .

    • Login to rate this comment
  • squirrel275

    Posted Oct 7, 2007 12:13 pm GMT

    HEY the reason why the 6600gt beat the x800pro is because it is at a LOWER RESOLUTION. Read the data before you make claims. It runs perfect on my system at 1440*900 highest settings, not high, but highest. My system:
    x2 5200+ am2 1mb, zalman 9500 cooling
    1950pro power color w/ accelero x2 cooling
    x-fi xtreme gamer
    2gb patriot ddr2 800mhz antec 500w psu

    • Login to rate this comment
  • never-named

    Posted Jun 20, 2007 2:28 pm GMT

    I've got:
    P4 2.4 GHz
    512mb RAM
    Radeon 9200 (128mb)

    How will it run?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • tiberuim

    Posted Apr 17, 2007 3:16 am GMT

    My PC can handle this game... barely. 1.7GHz
    512 MB RAM
    GeForce 5500
    Yeah, so, it ain't fast.
    The framerate is the problem. Its way too slow.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Trazac

    Posted Apr 3, 2007 7:39 am GMT

    Its locked because of the frame cap for the Doom 3 engine. Its not a hardware problem, its just a frame cap and and awesome video card which can play a game like this with no problem, staying at the cap the entier time it is played. There is a way to get around teh cap, just look for it yourslef and you might be happy with 100 FPS or so...

    • Login to rate this comment
  • domke13

    Posted Mar 31, 2007 11:22 am GMT

    My frames in prey are locked on 60 FPS on everythng maximum settings. It doesnt matter if i play it in 1024x768, or in 1280x1024 or in 1600x1200, i always get 60 FPS on geforce 8800 GTX. Do you have any idea why my framerate is locked on 60 FPS??

    • Login to rate this comment
  • zhonginator

    Posted Feb 21, 2007 12:51 pm GMT

    intel p4 3ghz, 2gb ddr2 ram, 256 mb ati radeon x1300, and it runs decently (2o to 30 fps) on 1024 x 768 medium settings

    • Login to rate this comment
  • sentenced83

    Posted Nov 14, 2006 7:03 am GMT

    4200+ x2 2.2 amd , 1 gig ram .. 7900 gto ,i play on maximum detail and 2x AA .. it runs flawlessly , amazingly fast

    • Login to rate this comment
  • heynownow

    Posted Oct 23, 2006 4:55 am GMT

    AThlon 2400XP
    Asus A7V8X
    1Gig PC-400 RAM
    Asus 9600XT /w 128 mb

    Kicks ass at 800 x 600 medium res. Helps that I retained my 15" monitor. Playable at 1024 x768 at low settings, but slows down to a crawl with increasing artifacts and cutscenes. Have noticed that the doom3 engine runs much better on nvidia than on ati cards. maybe it's something to do with the alleged leak of doom3 alpha by ATI that got ID pissed.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • someguy8892

    Posted Sep 22, 2006 4:44 pm GMT

    runs flawless on my system
    7950gx2
    4200@2.4
    2g xms ram
    ive ran this on a p4@3g with 768mb of ram and a 5700le on low so the game will run on just about anything. only got laggy when there was alot of action on screen.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • nategrantsharpe

    Posted Aug 30, 2006 8:15 am GMT

    Runs great on my system with settings max out 1024x768 but some slow downs at 1280x1024
    pentium 4 CPU 2.50GHz
    768MB of RAM
    256MB GDDR3 Radeon X700 pro

    • Login to rate this comment
  • lobsterbushcrab

    Posted Aug 30, 2006 6:06 am GMT

    i dont sea how poeple say that the 6600GT is a low end graphics card. it holds up with the 6800 and the X800 and there classed mid range it makes me laugh cos the 6600GT beats the X800 in this game.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • DeadParrot145

    Posted Aug 24, 2006 8:55 pm GMT

    Intel P4 2.2ghz
    1gb ddr 333mhz ram
    Radeon 9250 PCI

    works fine on the absolute lowest of the low setting with the exception of all the textures turned on, i think i could crank up the resolution up to 800x600 if i wanted as well

    • Login to rate this comment
  • skyline500

    Posted Aug 21, 2006 10:56 am GMT

    i have a hp a200n

    Intel Celeron 2.4
    728MB DDRPC 2100 RAM
    ATI Radeon 9200 128MB
    2 80GB Western Digital HD
    Logitech Mouse

    i put all my at medium with detail and exture high at 1024x728 at it ran at a steady frame per second onli on boas battle or big area that slow down occur i really hapen how my crappy computer play this but one thing i overclocked to graphic card to the near max so i think that why it play well idk

    • Login to rate this comment
  • funkyboy4ever

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 9:52 pm GMT

    my pc is

    AMD AthlonXP 2000+(1.66ghz)CPU
    1Gb DDR333 RAM
    Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb GRAPHIC CARD
    250GB 16mb Maxtor Sata Hard Disk
    MX510 Logitech Mouse

    I put all to max and it works fine with me...But before i play it ,it keep crashing..Then i go and update my ATI CATALYST and i can play the game without crashing it...

    Best Regards,
    Jeff......

    • Login to rate this comment
  • fuzzy901

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 9:44 pm GMT

    gigabz666:

    I have an old Dell Dimension 2400, and it actually ran Prey alright (read: playable, and nothing else) with it's dinosauric FX 5500. Maybe you have another issue with an even older piece of hardware?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • AnubanUT2

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 3:16 pm GMT

    Oh look another thread where immature people get to brag about their rigs ... meh.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Weskerrich

    Posted Aug 20, 2006 11:41 am GMT

    athlon 64 3200+, 768ram, 80gb hd, geforce 6600. Everything just beautiful in mediun detail with everything activated, just left behind the antialliasing and vertical sync. I don´t know what people complain of their cards. Some have a 6600gt, others x1600 pro and me, with my "pitifull" 6600 play every game in high and mediun detail.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • stardog229

    Posted Aug 19, 2006 9:30 pm GMT

    x2 3800 @ 2.55GHz
    7900Gt @ 640/1672MHz
    2 X 1GB DDR @ 454MHz

    Runs the game on near max settings (sans full AA - everything else full-blown) at 60 FPS. Beautiful.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • mercypoo

    Posted Aug 19, 2006 7:09 pm GMT

    Radeon X700 card
    Pentium 4 3.4 ghz
    1 gb ddr2 ram
    160 gb master hard drive

    played the game on high detail, 1024X768 with considerable slowdown. changed to 800X600, ran pretty smooth with occasional frame rate dips around 15 fps.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • gigabz666

    Posted Aug 19, 2006 9:59 am GMT

    Downloaded the demo and it does not like my system, probably cause I have a GeForce FX 5500. My system runs Half Life 2 pretty well but not on the max settings. So I'm gonna have to upgrade my graphics card. But if I get a PCI-E card, I would need a new motherboard, and also a new processor. So kind of expensive!

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Nemmox

    Posted Aug 19, 2006 6:59 am GMT

    Pentium 4 1.70ghz
    768 Mb in Ram
    60 Gb Hard Drive Master
    40 Gb Hard Drive Slave
    Radeon 9600 with 128 Mb
    600x400

    but i do occassionaly freeze for a few sec, then back to smooth FPS.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • iilxixiil

    Posted Aug 18, 2006 6:35 pm GMT

    1.2ghz Intel Celeron
    512mb ram
    Geforce MX750 256mb
    Onboard Sound
    1152x864

    haven't played the game yet.... but my guess is that it won't run well.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • d4rkt1m3

    Posted Aug 18, 2006 10:22 am GMT

    I have a AMD64 3500+ 2.2GHz

    1GB RAM DDR400

    Single 7800GTX

    I play 1280X1024 All maximum!
    I Love My Geforce 7series

    • Login to rate this comment
  • SecretWasianMan

    Posted Aug 16, 2006 11:55 am GMT

    (Insert Fake PC specs here)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • hunapu

    Posted Aug 16, 2006 9:23 am GMT

    EDIT: Given what I've read on other forae, it seems this freezing issue is a known problem with doom engine games and oc'ed comps.

    Lian Li PC-7B Plus II, Conroe E6700 @ 3.6, TT Big Typhoon, 2x1gb G.Skill PC6400ZX, Asus P5W DH Deluxe (0701), Gigabyte Radeon X1900XTX, OCZ GameXSteam 600W, Seagate 7200 320GB, Samsung 244T

    PREY plays almost perfectly maxed out at 1920x1200 for me, but i do occassionaly freeze for a sec, then back to smooth FPS. ANyone have any ideas what might be causing this freeze?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • tommorgan88

    Posted Aug 16, 2006 9:20 am GMT

    Core Duo 2Ghz 1Gb RAM, X1800 mobility radeon 256Mb 1400x900, 8xAA, 16xAF runs 40FPS+ constant

    • Login to rate this comment
  • g_man95

    Posted Aug 15, 2006 12:18 pm GMT

    sempron 2.800, 1Gb dual chanel, 6600gt oc 570-1150...1024x768, 2xAA, and rest at max(35-48 fps)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • drew829

    Posted Aug 12, 2006 9:53 pm GMT

    I got an AMD Athlon 3700+ 2.2 GHz rated at 3.7 GHz, Radeon x1900XT and 2 Gb of RAM.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • esir

    Posted Aug 12, 2006 6:00 am GMT

    ı heve athlon 3500,1n gig ram,7800 gt
    ı am playin 1280x1024 4x aa 8x af all settings high and everything great for me!

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Atwixtor

    Posted Aug 11, 2006 6:33 am GMT

    P4 3.2Ghz, 1GB RAM, ATI X800 XT PE (256MB)

    I can't get ANY antialising to work! I selected both 2x and 4x, and even though it reports they are enabled, I know that it is not working. AF works, but no AA. Any suggestions?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • endlsswing

    Posted Aug 9, 2006 10:09 pm GMT

    amd 4600 oc'd rated at 6.9 ghz
    2 7800gt's in sli oc'd with arctic cooling
    2gb ram

    • Login to rate this comment
  • SpartanSlayer97

    Posted Aug 7, 2006 2:57 am GMT

    My PC:
    CPU: Pentium D CPU 3.0 GHz
    CPU Speed: 2.99 GHz Performance Rated at 4.99 GHz
    RAM: 1 GB
    Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS (256 MB)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • igorcepro

    Posted Aug 7, 2006 1:39 am GMT

    I have Athlon XP 2000+(overclocked to 166x11=1833MHz), 512 MB PC400 Kingston CL2.5(Single channel), R9600Pro EZ 400/400 128bit 256MB, Audigy 4, Maxtor SATA2 300GB 16MB Cache(SATA1 set) on Epox 8RDA3+.
    When I started game default video settings was all to max and AF to 8x and resolution to 1024x768 because of my monitor. Game works ok, not perfect but it can be played ok. Sure, when I lower AF to 2x then it's better
    Anyway, sound card Audigy 4 boost most of games with hardware sound support, trust me folks, all games works fine on my machine.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • nubianpking

    Posted Aug 3, 2006 4:25 pm GMT

    All I did was turn down the brightness and then turn the gamma
    up a little bit, by nubianpking.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • nubianpking

    Posted Aug 3, 2006 4:25 pm GMT

    All I did was turn down the brightness and then turn the gamma
    up a little bit, by nubianpking.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • brainiac24

    Posted Aug 3, 2006 9:25 am GMT

    rofl its funny how they run these tests on ubercomputers, then expect us to find the performance guides useful. i mean...Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800...Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX 512MB...give us a break!

    • Login to rate this comment
  • 00Rambol00

    Posted Jul 31, 2006 5:58 pm GMT

    I should be gettin my new PC soon, it will pwn

    • Login to rate this comment
  • airguitargiles

    Posted Jul 31, 2006 6:05 am GMT

    3.00ghz P4 with Hyperthreading.
    1gb RAM.
    Geforce 6600LE 256mb AGP

    with those the game runs like a charm at 1024x768. Tried at 1152x864 runs just slightly slower.

    Cobhamar:
    "Well-apparently my graphics card cant run this game. But if I installed this game and did these settings would it work? Imnew to the PC scene so I really don't know too much about this stuff."

    If it doesn't work with your graphics card then changing the settings wont do anything. You need to buy graphics card that is supported by the game.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • coviechieif62

    Posted Jul 29, 2006 7:21 am GMT

    check this out!
    1.4 ghz processor, ati radeon x850 pro 256mb AGP, and 768 mb of RDRAM, yes that's RDRAM and it runs 30 fps on 1280x1024 w/ max settings on!
    (don't ask!)
    (God was on my side!)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • relset

    Posted Jul 28, 2006 2:03 pm GMT

    yess it runs well on my 6600

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Sexy_Pirate

    Posted Jul 27, 2006 2:03 am GMT

    Would this game do good on a 7600GT?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Death_Masta187

    Posted Jul 26, 2006 9:40 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

    • Login to rate this comment
  • nhlkoho

    Posted Jul 25, 2006 8:46 am GMT

    P4 3.0 ghz, 1 GB ram, 6800gt oc vid card, all settings maxed, 1024 x 768 resolution. Everything looks fine for me and didn't stutter once.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • maawal

    Posted Jul 25, 2006 12:18 am GMT

    Athlon 2200+,768 MB RAM ,128 MB GeForce FX-5200 (8X)

    The game sucks with the lowest(yeah,even the resolution) settings.But I played DOOM 3 and F.E.A.R. quite nicely, I mean I could play them well.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • zam90

    Posted Jul 24, 2006 7:34 pm GMT

    I run it fine with 2gig ram and a 6600 gt 512, dual core amd

    • Login to rate this comment
  • grouser22001

    Posted Jul 24, 2006 6:00 pm GMT

    amd 4000 at 3.0

    2 gig ram

    2 7800gts sli x16

    i play it at 1280x1024 4aa 8af everything else maxed
    i get 30-50 fps like butter.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • spawn611

    Posted Jul 24, 2006 12:50 pm GMT

    The demo runs great on my PC i have 3.2 Anthlon 64 , 1gb ram and Nvidia Geforce 6800xt 256mb. I also have Doom3 and Quake 4 there pretty mucho the same but doesnt stop me from having fun online. The fact is they look great. My sis has a Emachine 3.4 Semptron, 1GB ram minus 128mb for the intergrated Nvidia 6100 video card. The demo runs pretty nice on this pc a little lag sometimes.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Don_Shadio

    Posted Jul 24, 2006 2:20 am GMT

    I wonder why, you see, Doom3, Quake4 and now PREY, all on the same engine and yet none of these have got a good score at GS. I think the reason is they are more than just similar games. We don't get to see something REALLY new.

    • Login to rate this comment

Game Stats

Also on

Tags

Games you may like…