By: Sarju Shah - Posted on Wednesday, Oct 24th, 2006

Systems that run Battlefield 2 without a hitch will likely need few modifications to keep up with Battlefield 2142. But if you're on an older rig, you might need to upgrade a few parts. The two games are largely the same, but DICE gave 2142 a slightly updated graphical engine that has new animations and updated shaders.

We tested Battlefield 2142 using FRAPs and a 25-second driving scenario in the 48-person Suez Canal map. The frame rate results were consistent, but the numbers might be on the high side since the test doesn't include a lot of player models. We didn't play on populated servers or against other bots to keep our tests reproducible. The game also has a built-in frame rate cap of 100 frames per second. We increased graphics settings for our more powerful hardware to keep frame rates below the cap.

Game Settings
Battlefield 2142 has a few settings you can tweak to improve performance. We tested all the options to find out how much each setting affected frame-rate performance.

Graphics
Battlefield 2142 is based on the now-aging Battlefield 2 engine, which means it should run fine on moderate hardware. But if you're thinking of upgrading, we tested nearly 20 video cards to help you determine how much performance is enough.

CPU
We tested the game up and down the clock-speed ladder on our Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD Athlon 64 CPU-based systems. We even brought in some single core CPUs to see how they performed.

Memory
Moving up from 512MB to 1GB of system memory will help improve performance in most PC games. But it seems that even 2GB of RAM will give noticeable performance gains with Battlefield 2142.

What kind of setup do you use to play Battlefield 2142? Does it run well for you, or do you plan on upgrading? Share your experiences in the comments below!

441 Comments

  • penguins227

    Posted May 10, 2009 5:55 am GMT

    thanks for the response. I can run all on medium on 1280x800 resolution

  • challismiester

    Posted May 2, 2009 10:23 pm GMT

    hey will my system run this?

    Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3
    Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.40GHz
    1022MB RAM
    DirectX 9.0c
    RADEON 9200 PRO Family
    40 gb hard drive

    can someone plz reply because im thinking about buying it and i dont want to waste my money i would really appreciate it if some1 cud help me

  • JonWood007

    Posted Apr 19, 2009 7:47 am GMT

    I am running:

    Athlon XP 3200+
    2 GB DDR1 RAM
    HD 3650 AGP

    Performance varies greatly. Im supposed to be able to run this game well, but I really do not. Offline and in small games, I get a good 30-40 FPS. However, in large games, the game runs like crap. 15 FPS no matter what the settings. However, CPU will crash the computer on high settings. This is a load of bull, I can generally get 25-30 FPS in BF2 on high in 64 player games. However, this game runs like crap.

  • pvtdonut54

    Posted Mar 21, 2009 6:36 am GMT

    dude it runs like crud on my rig:
    HD 4830, AMD phenom x4 @ 2.2 ea., 6 gigs of ram

  • fima1fim

    Posted Sep 13, 2008 10:14 am GMT

    every 1 who have 1 GB ram and + intel core 2 duo video card 256 mb and + will run the game perfect!

  • cblx1

    Posted Aug 6, 2008 6:29 pm GMT

    My Comp: (not the best, but OK)
    -Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.13Ghz
    -256MB nVidia GForce 7500LE
    -2GB RAM
    -600GB 7200RPM HDD

    I play the game on medium graphics and it works just fine. It will work on full graphics, but there is about 5fps with that setting.

  • Souldominater

    Posted Aug 4, 2008 8:31 pm GMT

    this is a good game there is a code to unlock the frame rate but ill have to search for it im the Clan leader of +BLM+ clan and ConFliction mod team leader depending on wat your running even on the fastest system to perform better you need the extra fps set all graphics to low and turn enhanced lighting effect offset sound qaulkity to high and hit rego will favour you

    www.youtube.com/preatorian2

    also dont worry 1 gig will run it fine make sure your procesors arent running crap in background
    eg msn xfire and sum mate stealing your porn while online LOL and turn your firewall off unless its a avast firewall style xp doesnt like bf242 and does cause it to crash

  • odioamujeres

    Posted Jul 30, 2008 8:43 pm GMT

    JUST BUY A INTEL CORE 2 DUO PEOPLE UCZ IF U HAV INTEL CELERON D IT WILL RUN VERY SLOW ITS ALL ABOUT THE CLOCK SPEED

  • xxxShinjixxx

    Posted Jun 15, 2008 5:36 am GMT

    that sure hardware someone 1024x768
    after software into hardware
    heads up!

  • icepop4who

    Posted May 25, 2008 7:16 pm GMT

    yeah, definitely. it should run nicely on medium. consider upgrading to 2GB of RAM for a boost.

  • penguins227

    Posted May 3, 2008 9:46 am GMT

    hey will my system run this????
    Windows Xp Home edition
    Ati Radeon X1650 pro 512 mb video memory
    1024 mb of ram
    1024x768 resolution
    AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, MMX, 3DNow, ~2.2GHz
    any answer would be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    thanks

  • penguins227

    Posted May 3, 2008 9:44 am GMT

    hey will my system run this????
    Windows Xp Home edition
    Ati Radeon X1650 pro 512 mb video memory
    1024 mb of ram
    1024x768 resolution
    AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, MMX, 3DNow, ~2.2GHz
    any answer would be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    thanks

  • jayzenman

    Posted Mar 23, 2008 2:36 pm GMT

    im waiting on my video card right now,when it gets here this is what ill be running-IBM - System Model #830335U
    mainboard x86. Microsoft Windows XP Professional,2 GiG of ram,Sapphirre ATI Radeon X1550 256MB DDR2 DVI/HDTV AGP.will my system play 2142?i current ly barely run 2142 on the same system using a once good but old ATI Radeon 9600 / X1050 Series

  • zac32

    Posted Mar 12, 2008 1:07 am GMT

    I Run This Game On My Machine:

    Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 32-Bit
    AMD Athlon64 X2 6000+ Dual Core Processor 3.0Ghz
    2GB Corsair XMS2 800
    XFX GeForce 8800GT 512MB DDR3 Extreme (i used one card only)
    Asus M2N32-SLI Vista Edition n-force 590i (Asus Accelerated Propeller is used)
    420GB HD
    ZALMAN 600 Watt PowerSupply (Heat Pipe Cooled)

    Im using All High Settings in this game.
    What can I say is, like im playing the old game. It's just fine, no Graphical Problems.

  • nate1222

    Posted Mar 9, 2008 8:04 pm GMT

    @adv_tr00per

    Thanks for the heads up. I've got a nVidia GeForce 8500(512MB). It makes Oblivion look close to the XBox360 version. I own both versions. I'm upgrading to a 9600 in a few weeks. 8800 is cool, but it's a resource hog-it needs 1GB RAM. 9600 isn't as powerful, but only uses 512MB RAM. I've got 2GB RAM and Vista uses 400+MB RAM.

    @galoku

    I found your chart to be highly useful. Thanks-a-mil!

  • adv_tr00per

    Posted Feb 12, 2008 12:54 pm GMT

    with an ati radeon 2600 hd pro i can run it at 1280 by 960 at max setting with AA off and enhanced lighting off. enhanced lighting makes no difference at all so it just uses up pointless frames per second.

  • galoku

    Posted Jan 23, 2008 10:27 pm GMT

    I've played this game on a FX5200, 6600GT, a 7900GS and a 8800GTX with 512MB, 1GB and 2GB RAM.
    Depending on how old your graphics card is the less frames you will get.

    BUT!

    The RAM made a big difference. (On the 7900GS PCI-e)
    512MB - choppy sound and constant visual lag (regardless of card used)
    1GB - choppy sound only in high action (like orbital strike) + some visual lag
    2GB - close to no lag visual or audio

    For:
    Gefore7 above put on high if you have 7800+ or med/high(custom) if its 7600or below Geforce 6 med
    geforce 5 Low
    (similar for equivlent ATi cards)
    I suggest using at least 1GB because then you can actually kill people

    **to see in game FPS use: renderer.drawFps 1 on the console by taing the key just below ESC

  • Sammojo

    Posted Jan 5, 2008 5:14 am GMT

    MY 7600GS has a lot of trouble with this game. I cannot get the graphics on decent, even with 800x600, and keep playable frame rates. The view distance becomes horrible and I don't even play because the game looks so bad. Anyone else had this problem, I should be able to run it on decent graphics but it just wont happen.

  • zor_warrior

    Posted Jan 1, 2008 3:03 pm GMT

    My PC is:
    AMD Duron 1.8Ghz; Nvidia GeForce 6200 AGP 8x (running in AGP 4x slot) 128 MB DDR2;
    512 MB of RAM DDR1 400Mhz;
    20 GB of HD
    but Battlefield 2142 runs good here xD

  • Joe-Mamma-13

    Posted Dec 24, 2007 6:43 am GMT

    Processor type AMD Turionâ„¢ 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-58
    • , Level 2 cache 512 KB + 512 KB, Up to 1600 MHz system bus running at AC/DC mode 35 Watt
    Operating system installed Genuine Windows Vista® Home Premium 32-bit
    Standard memory 2048 MB
    Maximum memory Supports up to 2 GB DDR2 memory
    Memory layout (2 x 1024 MB)
    Internal drives
    Internal hard disk drive 160 GB
    Hard disk controller SATA Hard Disk Drive
    Hard disk drive speed 5400 rpm
    Optical drive type Lightscribe Super Multi DVD Writer (+/-R +/-RW) with Double Layer support
    Video adapter NVIDIA® GeForce™ 7150M
    Video RAM Up to 559 MB total available graphics memory
    Remote control HP Mobile Remote Control
    Internal audio 3D Sound Blaster Pro compatible sound 16 bit integrated
    Since it's an X2 it has two 1.73GHz, two 1mb caches etc.
    What settings do you suggest running 2142 on it with?

  • rokkuman09

    Posted Dec 23, 2007 12:00 pm GMT

    Dragoon45 I think you should be able to run it on it's highest settings, but I think you should run it with 2xAA. Your graphics card is about the equivalent to a 7600GT (except that yours has DX10 support). In the benchmarks it says they got 37fps on the 7600GT on high quality with 4xAA and 4xAF, but they have a faster processor, and their RAM has better latencys and runs at a higher clock speed (although the performance difference because of that will be minimal). So I would suggest your run it with 2xAA and maybe some stuff on medium, just so it doesn't bog down in bigger battles (it can get hectic in 64 player games!).

  • Joe-Mamma-13

    Posted Dec 22, 2007 6:05 am GMT

    {edit}
    160gb hdd and vista

  • Joe-Mamma-13

    Posted Dec 22, 2007 6:03 am GMT

    My LAPTOP runs a AMD Turion 64X2, 2gb of RAM, a 559mb nvidia gforce 7150m.
    It goes on 1.9GHz/ 1600MHz.
    I have Btllfield 2142 haven't tried it yet, what do any of you think?

  • clinezy

    Posted Dec 21, 2007 9:17 am GMT

    My Mac Runs it, it is

    16GB RAM
    2 x 3.0GHz Quad core processors
    4 x 7300GT NVIDIA 786MB
    500HDD

  • Dragoon45

    Posted Dec 15, 2007 8:41 am GMT

    I'm wondering if my laptop can run it. Specs:
    Core 2 duo Merom T7500 2.2ghz
    Geforce 8600mgt (crippled due to it having gddr2)
    2GB mushkin ram 667mhz
    Windows xp
    I really want to be able to play the game on the highest settings at 1280x800, with 4xAF and 4xAA. The reason why I'm skeptical is because of how crippled the 8600mgt is since it was given gddr2 and not gddr3. Memory clock is 400mhz and gddr3 memory clock is 700mhz (talking in actual clock, not effective clock).

  • IIBlackknightII

    Posted Nov 28, 2007 11:00 pm GMT

    My comp has:- P4 @ 2.99 Ghz Graphics Card: Geforce FX 5200 Memory: 512 MB RAM
    With the low settings also i get lags a lot since my Graphics card is old so need to upgrade that part & Memory too.It works fine at Single Player Or LAN mode Except Online.I am to buy a new pc by next year.Upgrade:-
    Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor QX6850 Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 Ultra
    Memory: 4 GB RAM
    I hope these requirments must be good enough than the minimum requirements of this game to run the game with hitch - free at all especially online.
    Good Information Of hardware performance From GameSpot about BF2142.
    Thanks a lot. B-)

  • Roco_DC

    Posted Nov 25, 2007 9:14 am GMT

    and death4us maybe its because you have vista, vista is just horrible in my opinion just stick with XP for now...

  • death4us

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 11:33 am GMT

    Ow. That explains a lot.
    Thanks.
    Are they going to patch that up anytime soon?

  • xxLordDavidxx

    Posted Nov 22, 2007 11:45 am GMT

    Remember that Battlefield 2142 does NOT support dual core CPUs.

    If you have a 1.8 dual core processor it will only use 1.8ghz of processor power - resulting in a bad gameplay experiance.

  • death4us

    Posted Nov 20, 2007 5:33 pm GMT

    256 MB ATI Mobility Radeon X1800
    Intel Core 2 Duo Processor T5600 1.83GHz 2MB Cache 667MHz FSB
    1 GB Dual Channel DDR2 SO-DIMM at 667MHz
    Vista Home Premium

    And it lags a TON. Is this my computer's fault or my internet's fault?

  • Roco_DC

    Posted Oct 21, 2007 5:37 pm GMT

    AMD Athlonâ„¢64 X2 6000+ Dual-Core CPU
    NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS with 512 mb 2gb DDR2 RAM

    will this run bf2142 with no lag?

  • Dylanbobo

    Posted Oct 8, 2007 4:59 pm GMT

    Im running a P4 3.2 ghz and 1 gb of ram in 4 256MB chips but i just bought Ascentive WinRocket and optimized it for games and it runs a hella lot better, almost no lag. Guys get WIN ROCKET from ASCENTIVE it pwnes HC. I just bought 2 gigs of Corsair XMS2 ram and i hope it improves the game play cus I got really bad sound lag when the computer starts to say stuff like "Hostile Infantry" and "Medic" stuff like that sounds choppy. But overall great program WinRocket and all hail the EU.

  • matt168

    Posted Sep 30, 2007 1:32 pm GMT

    hmm this may be of singleplayer but i can play bf2142 at max no aa at 1152x800 something res and it plays well.no lag or anything

  • matt168

    Posted Sep 25, 2007 3:13 pm GMT

    nvm dont answer. it plays pretty well for a intergrated card.
    amd 3800+ 2.4ghz
    1256mb ram
    6150LE video card and i can play at medim settings fine but slows when a explosion happens but it runs smooth at low and medium settings at 800x600 res

  • matt168

    Posted Sep 23, 2007 8:58 am GMT

    could a 6150LE play this game at 1024x768 res atleast on medium settings?

  • gamemaster2200

    Posted Sep 11, 2007 3:03 pm GMT

    And Yes I know its a junky graphics card.

  • gamemaster2200

    Posted Sep 11, 2007 2:56 pm GMT

    Think my old computer would run it. XP Home Intel P4 2.93 ghz 1.5 gb split ram(2 512mb & 2 256mb) Nvidia GEFORCE FX 5200 256mb

  • fitblood

    Posted Aug 5, 2007 4:49 pm GMT

    Alright i was wondering how well my system would play this game if someone could tell me that would be great Intel Core 2 Quad CPU @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs)
    2 GB of RAM
    Radeon X1650 SE Windows Vistaâ„¢ Home Premium

  • ryokinshin6x3

    Posted Aug 5, 2007 7:44 am GMT

    yes

  • Jfrando

    Posted Jul 29, 2007 12:36 pm GMT

    could this system actually run this game?

    Core 2 Duo T5500 1.66 GHz
    RAM - 1 GB NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 TurboCache supporting 256MB - 128 MB Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005

  • Muppetchief

    Posted Jul 15, 2007 1:35 pm GMT

    my 2142 specs:
    running the game graphics on medium preset processor: AMD ATHLON 3300 2.0 GHz RAM: 1.25GB ( 1 gig stick with 256mb in second slot)
    Graphics card: Radeon 9550 256mb sound card: on board sound

  • Vish23

    Posted Jul 9, 2007 5:26 pm GMT

    Mine runs medium - high. If I make everything high it runs fine but only the loading takes ages.
    I have an AMD ATHLON X2 DUAL CORE at about 2.4 GHz
    2 GB of RAM (just upgraded it from 1gig)
    Nvidia 8600 GT
    EDIT - I have vista

  • isnuke

    Posted Jun 16, 2007 4:54 pm GMT

    Mine just runs fine... except for when i installed windows vista! P4 3.2 GHZ HT, 1GB RAM, 6800XT 512MB DDR3, Seagate Baracuda HDD... i dont think anything else counts...

  • Bennycal

    Posted Jun 10, 2007 4:13 am GMT

    low to medium probably.

  • gswarriors26

    Posted Jun 7, 2007 7:24 am GMT

    what setteings can a Radeon X1550 256MB play at.
    with amd 4600+ and 1 gig of ram.

  • codjumper_roe

    Posted Jun 2, 2007 7:08 pm GMT

    stefan_vaziri ....i don't think your card can even run this game because i THINK it takes a 9500 to run it(my previous had a 9550) and it ran at.....20-30fps...omg talk about lag...think about getting a new machine cuz i just ordered a comp with
    Western Digital Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB Serial ATA 10,000RPM Hard Drive w/16MB Buffer Liteon LH-20A1H 20X Dual Layer DVD±RW Drive w/Super Allwrite & Lightscribe Beige/Black Retail Intel® Core 2 Duo E6600 Conroe Processor 2.4GHz, 1066FSB, LGA775, 4MB Cache Retail OCZ OCZ2FX800C42GK DDR2 PC2-6400 2GB Kit FlexXLC Edition Memory Retail XFX PVT80GTHF9 GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB GDDR3 PCI Express Video Card w/Dual-DVI, HDTV-Out Retail Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (Full Version) Single-Pack OEM Asus P5N32-E SLI nForce 680i SLI Socket 775 1333MHz DDR2-800 ATX Motherboard Retail Coolermaster RP-650-PCAR eXtreme Power 650W Power Supply Retaill im hoping this can run much faster :p

  • Joe_Lost

    Posted May 31, 2007 8:29 am GMT

    Running:
    ASUS P4P800 Deluxe MoBo
    Intel Pentium 4 2.8Ghz Extreme
    2GB DDR(3200) RAM
    HIS X1950 Pro, Dual DL-DVI, 512MB GDDR3, AGP Graphics Card
    Zalman Reserator 1V2 Watercooling(Yeah Baby) for maximum temperature stability
    DELL Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC, 30" Screen (BEAUTIFUL)

    Runs on rails. Asus hardware remains the premium system hardware for stability and performance without needing to be a full techy.

    1600x1200, everything on high and Mid AA. I have not seen the FPS, but the picture remains smooth as silk, no matter how much action is going on on the screen.

    New system built for a friend:

    ASUS Striker Extreme, nForce 680i SLI MoBo
    Core 2 Duo E6600
    2GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 (PC2-1066) RAM [4GB not going to help]
    ASUS Extreme N8800 GTX/HTDP, GeForce 8800 GTX, 768MB GDDR3
    CREATIVE Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Fatal1ty Pro
    Zalman Reserator 2 Water cooling
    DELL UltraSharp 2407WFP, 24" Screen

    You can imagine the performance.

    I called the rig "Dog's"

  • X360PS3AMD05

    Posted May 29, 2007 8:11 pm GMT

    Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2.5ghz, 1GB ddr-400, 7950gt OCed. In SP i can get 60FPS @ 1680*1050 with pretty much everything on high and some AA. But when i go into MP i can't get more than 30 IDK if it's my slow internet (300kbps DSL) or if i need more RAM or what? In order to play it smoothly online i have to drop to 1024*768 or whatever the default res. is.

  • rokkuman09

    Posted May 9, 2007 4:16 pm GMT

    Won00b nice setup, you ill be running this game awesome, personally I think you should O/C your cpu though, all the C2D CPUs are great for overclocking, you should be able to get it to around 3.00GHz with stock cooling.

  • spawn611

    Posted May 2, 2007 6:29 pm GMT

    On my pc I have AMD Anthlon 64 3200+ , 1GB Corsair RAM, XFX Nvidea 256mb 6800xt. Im planing to add 2 GB RAM for the moment.

advertisement
Battlefield 2142 Boxshot
Battlefield 2142

Game Stats

Full Game Details »Close
Also on

Tags

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games