E-mail:
Password:
GameSpot Video Games, PC, Wii, PlayStation 2, GameCube, PSP, DS, GBA, PS2, PS3, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3

Systems that run Battlefield 2 without a hitch will likely need few modifications to keep up with Battlefield 2142. But if you're on an older rig, you might need to upgrade a few parts. The two games are largely the same, but DICE gave 2142 a slightly updated graphical engine that has new animations and updated shaders.

We tested Battlefield 2142 using FRAPs and a 25-second driving scenario in the 48-person Suez Canal map. The frame rate results were consistent, but the numbers might be on the high side since the test doesn't include a lot of player models. We didn't play on populated servers or against other bots to keep our tests reproducible. The game also has a built-in frame rate cap of 100 frames per second. We increased graphics settings for our more powerful hardware to keep frame rates below the cap.

Game Settings
Battlefield 2142 has a few settings you can tweak to improve performance. We tested all the options to find out how much each setting affected frame-rate performance.

Graphics
Battlefield 2142 is based on the now-aging Battlefield 2 engine, which means it should run fine on moderate hardware. But if you're thinking of upgrading, we tested nearly 20 video cards to help you determine how much performance is enough.

CPU
We tested the game up and down the clock-speed ladder on our Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD Athlon 64 CPU-based systems. We even brought in some single core CPUs to see how they performed.

Memory
Moving up from 512MB to 1GB of system memory will help improve performance in most PC games. But it seems that even 2GB of RAM will give noticeable performance gains with Battlefield 2142.



What kind of setup do you use to play Battlefield 2142? Does it run well for you, or do you plan on upgrading? Share your experiences in the comments below!
Sign up now to post a comment on this story!

433 Comments

First to Last Latest
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
« prevnext »
xxxShinjixxx

that sure hardware someone 1024x768
after software into hardware
heads up!

Posted Jun 15, 2008 5:36 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
icepop4who

yeah, definitely. it should run nicely on medium. consider upgrading to 2GB of RAM for a boost.

Posted May 25, 2008 7:16 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
penguins227

hey will my system run this????
Windows Xp Home edition
Ati Radeon X1650 pro 512 mb video memory
1024 mb of ram
1024x768 resolution
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, MMX, 3DNow, ~2.2GHz
any answer would be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks

Posted May 3, 2008 9:46 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
penguins227

hey will my system run this????
Windows Xp Home edition
Ati Radeon X1650 pro 512 mb video memory
1024 mb of ram
1024x768 resolution
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, MMX, 3DNow, ~2.2GHz
any answer would be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks

Posted May 3, 2008 9:44 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
jayzenman

im waiting on my video card right now,when it gets here this is what ill be running-IBM - System Model #830335U
mainboard x86. Microsoft Windows XP Professional,2 GiG of ram,Sapphirre ATI Radeon X1550 256MB DDR2 DVI/HDTV AGP.will my system play 2142?i current ly barely run 2142 on the same system using a once good but old ATI Radeon 9600 / X1050 Series

Posted Mar 23, 2008 2:36 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (-1)
zac32

I Run This Game On My Machine:

Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 32-Bit
AMD Athlon64 X2 6000+ Dual Core Processor 3.0Ghz
2GB Corsair XMS2 800
XFX GeForce 8800GT 512MB DDR3 Extreme (i used one card only)
Asus M2N32-SLI Vista Edition n-force 590i (Asus Accelerated Propeller is used)
420GB HD
ZALMAN 600 Watt PowerSupply (Heat Pipe Cooled)

Im using All High Settings in this game.
What can I say is, like im playing the old game. It's just fine, no Graphical Problems.

Posted Mar 12, 2008 1:07 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
nate1222

@adv_tr00per

Thanks for the heads up. I've got a nVidia GeForce 8500(512MB). It makes Oblivion look close to the XBox360 version. I own both versions. I'm upgrading to a 9600 in a few weeks. 8800 is cool, but it's a resource hog-it needs 1GB RAM. 9600 isn't as powerful, but only uses 512MB RAM. I've got 2GB RAM and Vista uses 400+MB RAM.

@galoku

I found your chart to be highly useful. Thanks-a-mil!

Posted Mar 9, 2008 8:04 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
adv_tr00per

with an ati radeon 2600 hd pro i can run it at 1280 by 960 at max setting with AA off and enhanced lighting off. enhanced lighting makes no difference at all so it just uses up pointless frames per second.

Posted Feb 12, 2008 12:54 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
galoku

I've played this game on a FX5200, 6600GT, a 7900GS and a 8800GTX with 512MB, 1GB and 2GB RAM.
Depending on how old your graphics card is the less frames you will get.

BUT!

The RAM made a big difference. (On the 7900GS PCI-e)
512MB - choppy sound and constant visual lag (regardless of card used)
1GB - choppy sound only in high action (like orbital strike) + some visual lag
2GB - close to no lag visual or audio

For:
Gefore7 above put on high if you have 7800+ or med/high(custom) if its 7600or below Geforce 6 med
geforce 5 Low
(similar for equivlent ATi cards)
I suggest using at least 1GB because then you can actually kill people

**to see in game FPS use: renderer.drawFps 1 on the console by taing the key just below ESC

Posted Jan 23, 2008 10:27 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Sammojo

MY 7600GS has a lot of trouble with this game. I cannot get the graphics on decent, even with 800x600, and keep playable frame rates. The view distance becomes horrible and I don't even play because the game looks so bad. Anyone else had this problem, I should be able to run it on decent graphics but it just wont happen.

Posted Jan 5, 2008 5:14 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
zor_warrior

My PC is:
AMD Duron 1.8Ghz; Nvidia GeForce 6200 AGP 8x (running in AGP 4x slot) 128 MB DDR2;
512 MB of RAM DDR1 400Mhz;
20 GB of HD
but Battlefield 2142 runs good here xD

Posted Jan 1, 2008 3:03 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Joe-Mamma-13

Processor type AMD Turionâ„¢ 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-58
• , Level 2 cache 512 KB + 512 KB, Up to 1600 MHz system bus running at AC/DC mode 35 Watt
Operating system installed Genuine Windows Vista® Home Premium 32-bit
Standard memory 2048 MB
Maximum memory Supports up to 2 GB DDR2 memory
Memory layout (2 x 1024 MB)
Internal drives
Internal hard disk drive 160 GB
Hard disk controller SATA Hard Disk Drive
Hard disk drive speed 5400 rpm
Optical drive type Lightscribe Super Multi DVD Writer (+/-R +/-RW) with Double Layer support
Video adapter NVIDIA® GeForce™ 7150M
Video RAM Up to 559 MB total available graphics memory
Remote control HP Mobile Remote Control
Internal audio 3D Sound Blaster Pro compatible sound 16 bit integrated
Since it's an X2 it has two 1.73GHz, two 1mb caches etc.
What settings do you suggest running 2142 on it with?

Posted Dec 24, 2007 6:43 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
rokkuman09

Dragoon45 I think you should be able to run it on it's highest settings, but I think you should run it with 2xAA. Your graphics card is about the equivalent to a 7600GT (except that yours has DX10 support). In the benchmarks it says they got 37fps on the 7600GT on high quality with 4xAA and 4xAF, but they have a faster processor, and their RAM has better latencys and runs at a higher clock speed (although the performance difference because of that will be minimal). So I would suggest your run it with 2xAA and maybe some stuff on medium, just so it doesn't bog down in bigger battles (it can get hectic in 64 player games!).

Posted Dec 23, 2007 12:00 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Joe-Mamma-13

{edit}
160gb hdd and vista

Posted Dec 22, 2007 6:05 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Joe-Mamma-13

My LAPTOP runs a AMD Turion 64X2, 2gb of RAM, a 559mb nvidia gforce 7150m.
It goes on 1.9GHz/ 1600MHz.
I have Btllfield 2142 haven't tried it yet, what do any of you think?

Posted Dec 22, 2007 6:03 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
clinezy

My Mac Runs it, it is

16GB RAM
2 x 3.0GHz Quad core processors
4 x 7300GT NVIDIA 786MB
500HDD

Posted Dec 21, 2007 9:17 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Dragoon45

I'm wondering if my laptop can run it. Specs:
Core 2 duo Merom T7500 2.2ghz
Geforce 8600mgt (crippled due to it having gddr2)
2GB mushkin ram 667mhz
Windows xp
I really want to be able to play the game on the highest settings at 1280x800, with 4xAF and 4xAA. The reason why I'm skeptical is because of how crippled the 8600mgt is since it was given gddr2 and not gddr3. Memory clock is 400mhz and gddr3 memory clock is 700mhz (talking in actual clock, not effective clock).

Posted Dec 15, 2007 8:41 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
IIBlackknightII

My comp has:- P4 @ 2.99 Ghz Graphics Card: Geforce FX 5200 Memory: 512 MB RAM
With the low settings also i get lags a lot since my Graphics card is old so need to upgrade that part & Memory too.It works fine at Single Player Or LAN mode Except Online.I am to buy a new pc by next year.Upgrade:-
Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor QX6850 Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 Ultra
Memory: 4 GB RAM
I hope these requirments must be good enough than the minimum requirements of this game to run the game with hitch - free at all especially online.
Good Information Of hardware performance From GameSpot about BF2142.
Thanks a lot. B-)

Posted Nov 28, 2007 11:00 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
Roco_DC

and death4us maybe its because you have vista, vista is just horrible in my opinion just stick with XP for now...

Posted Nov 25, 2007 9:14 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (-2)
death4us

Ow. That explains a lot.
Thanks.
Are they going to patch that up anytime soon?

Posted Nov 23, 2007 11:33 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
xxLordDavidxx

Remember that Battlefield 2142 does NOT support dual core CPUs.

If you have a 1.8 dual core processor it will only use 1.8ghz of processor power - resulting in a bad gameplay experiance.

Posted Nov 22, 2007 11:45 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (-1)
death4us

256 MB ATI Mobility Radeon X1800
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor T5600 1.83GHz 2MB Cache 667MHz FSB
1 GB Dual Channel DDR2 SO-DIMM at 667MHz
Vista Home Premium

And it lags a TON. Is this my computer's fault or my internet's fault?

Posted Nov 20, 2007 5:33 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Roco_DC

AMD Athlonâ„¢64 X2 6000+ Dual-Core CPU
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS with 512 mb 2gb DDR2 RAM

will this run bf2142 with no lag?

Posted Oct 21, 2007 5:37 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Dylanbobo

Im running a P4 3.2 ghz and 1 gb of ram in 4 256MB chips but i just bought Ascentive WinRocket and optimized it for games and it runs a hella lot better, almost no lag. Guys get WIN ROCKET from ASCENTIVE it pwnes HC. I just bought 2 gigs of Corsair XMS2 ram and i hope it improves the game play cus I got really bad sound lag when the computer starts to say stuff like "Hostile Infantry" and "Medic" stuff like that sounds choppy. But overall great program WinRocket and all hail the EU.

Posted Oct 8, 2007 4:59 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
matt168

hmm this may be of singleplayer but i can play bf2142 at max no aa at 1152x800 something res and it plays well.no lag or anything

Posted Sep 30, 2007 1:32 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
matt168

nvm dont answer. it plays pretty well for a intergrated card.
amd 3800+ 2.4ghz
1256mb ram
6150LE video card and i can play at medim settings fine but slows when a explosion happens but it runs smooth at low and medium settings at 800x600 res

Posted Sep 25, 2007 3:13 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
matt168

could a 6150LE play this game at 1024x768 res atleast on medium settings?

Posted Sep 23, 2007 8:58 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
gamemaster2200

And Yes I know its a junky graphics card.

Posted Sep 11, 2007 3:03 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
gamemaster2200

Think my old computer would run it. XP Home Intel P4 2.93 ghz 1.5 gb split ram(2 512mb & 2 256mb) Nvidia GEFORCE FX 5200 256mb

Posted Sep 11, 2007 2:56 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
fitblood

Alright i was wondering how well my system would play this game if someone could tell me that would be great Intel Core 2 Quad CPU @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs)
2 GB of RAM
Radeon X1650 SE Windows Vistaâ„¢ Home Premium

Posted Aug 5, 2007 4:49 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
ryokinshin6x3

yes

Posted Aug 5, 2007 7:44 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
Jfrando

could this system actually run this game?

Core 2 Duo T5500 1.66 GHz
RAM - 1 GB NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 TurboCache supporting 256MB - 128 MB Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005

Posted Jul 29, 2007 12:36 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Muppetchief

my 2142 specs:
running the game graphics on medium preset processor: AMD ATHLON 3300 2.0 GHz RAM: 1.25GB ( 1 gig stick with 256mb in second slot)
Graphics card: Radeon 9550 256mb sound card: on board sound

Posted Jul 15, 2007 1:35 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+2)
Vish23

Mine runs medium - high. If I make everything high it runs fine but only the loading takes ages.
I have an AMD ATHLON X2 DUAL CORE at about 2.4 GHz
2 GB of RAM (just upgraded it from 1gig)
Nvidia 8600 GT
EDIT - I have vista

Posted Jul 9, 2007 5:26 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
isnuke

Mine just runs fine... except for when i installed windows vista! P4 3.2 GHZ HT, 1GB RAM, 6800XT 512MB DDR3, Seagate Baracuda HDD... i dont think anything else counts...

Posted Jun 16, 2007 4:54 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Bennycal

low to medium probably.

Posted Jun 10, 2007 4:13 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
gswarriors26

what setteings can a Radeon X1550 256MB play at.
with amd 4600+ and 1 gig of ram.

Posted Jun 7, 2007 7:24 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
codjumper_roe

stefan_vaziri ....i don't think your card can even run this game because i THINK it takes a 9500 to run it(my previous had a 9550) and it ran at.....20-30fps...omg talk about lag...think about getting a new machine cuz i just ordered a comp with
Western Digital Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB Serial ATA 10,000RPM Hard Drive w/16MB Buffer Liteon LH-20A1H 20X Dual Layer DVD±RW Drive w/Super Allwrite & Lightscribe Beige/Black Retail Intel® Core 2 Duo E6600 Conroe Processor 2.4GHz, 1066FSB, LGA775, 4MB Cache Retail OCZ OCZ2FX800C42GK DDR2 PC2-6400 2GB Kit FlexXLC Edition Memory Retail XFX PVT80GTHF9 GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB GDDR3 PCI Express Video Card w/Dual-DVI, HDTV-Out Retail Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (Full Version) Single-Pack OEM Asus P5N32-E SLI nForce 680i SLI Socket 775 1333MHz DDR2-800 ATX Motherboard Retail Coolermaster RP-650-PCAR eXtreme Power 650W Power Supply Retaill im hoping this can run much faster :p

Posted Jun 2, 2007 7:08 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (-2)
Joe_Lost

Running:
ASUS P4P800 Deluxe MoBo
Intel Pentium 4 2.8Ghz Extreme
2GB DDR(3200) RAM
HIS X1950 Pro, Dual DL-DVI, 512MB GDDR3, AGP Graphics Card
Zalman Reserator 1V2 Watercooling(Yeah Baby) for maximum temperature stability
DELL Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC, 30" Screen (BEAUTIFUL)

Runs on rails. Asus hardware remains the premium system hardware for stability and performance without needing to be a full techy.

1600x1200, everything on high and Mid AA. I have not seen the FPS, but the picture remains smooth as silk, no matter how much action is going on on the screen.

New system built for a friend:

ASUS Striker Extreme, nForce 680i SLI MoBo
Core 2 Duo E6600
2GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 (PC2-1066) RAM [4GB not going to help]
ASUS Extreme N8800 GTX/HTDP, GeForce 8800 GTX, 768MB GDDR3
CREATIVE Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Fatal1ty Pro
Zalman Reserator 2 Water cooling
DELL UltraSharp 2407WFP, 24" Screen

You can imagine the performance.

I called the rig "Dog's"

Posted May 31, 2007 8:29 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
X360PS3AMD05

Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2.5ghz, 1GB ddr-400, 7950gt OCed. In SP i can get 60FPS @ 1680*1050 with pretty much everything on high and some AA. But when i go into MP i can't get more than 30 IDK if it's my slow internet (300kbps DSL) or if i need more RAM or what? In order to play it smoothly online i have to drop to 1024*768 or whatever the default res. is.

Posted May 29, 2007 8:11 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
rokkuman09

Won00b nice setup, you ill be running this game awesome, personally I think you should O/C your cpu though, all the C2D CPUs are great for overclocking, you should be able to get it to around 3.00GHz with stock cooling.

Posted May 9, 2007 4:16 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
spawn611

On my pc I have AMD Anthlon 64 3200+ , 1GB Corsair RAM, XFX Nvidea 256mb 6800xt. Im planing to add 2 GB RAM for the moment.

Posted May 2, 2007 6:29 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
won00b

Well, I just upgraded:
Core 2 Duo E6700 2.6
BFG 8800 GTX
4 Gigs RAM

But on older rigs, I found that it helped to jack the resolution up to maximum, but keep everything else on the lowest setting (fool around with view distance, for optimum performance and view).

Posted May 2, 2007 5:25 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
stefan_vaziri

radeon 9250 with 1g of ram be ok?

Posted Apr 28, 2007 12:04 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (-1)
Jac5232

P4 3.0 Ghz
1 GIG of RAM
Soundblaster Live 5.1 (with one speaker broken)
Radeon X700 Pro

Far from the best, but more than playable on mediumish settings at 1024x768 res. I say mediumish because I was able to jack the Texture Filtering to its max value., and draw distance is at max.

Posted Apr 27, 2007 9:11 am GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
skoltz

I have the system needed to compete with all of the hard core Battlefielders.
Pentium D w/ 2gig ram, Nvidia 7950 GT OC, Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer & DVI 19" Panel.
If you want the gain you need to spend for the gain.

Posted Apr 24, 2007 4:42 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Klaimore

lol internet

Posted Apr 20, 2007 4:30 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
tekjansen

Opteron 148 @ 2.7GHz
2GB Corsair DDR400
Asus EN8800GTS 640MB

Been playing this game since the day it came out, I never got into Battlefield 2 (although I do think it's a very fun game) but I have to say I think Battlefield 2142 is by far the greatest FPS out there. The new 16xQ anti aliasing setting on the 8-series looks killer. I have the 640MB version, but judging by my performance (completely maxed, 16xQAA/16xAF 1600x1200: 40-70 fps) I think the 320MB version (as little as $260) would do better than fine. I played a few LAN sessions with my buddy on his laptop, an Asus W7j with 7400TC, and it played with mostly high settings, just turned down view distance to 95% and shut off Anti Aliasing. Looked great tho, 1280x800.

The 8900 series is coming out soon, keep that in mind. I'll be upgrading to the 8950GX2 and new CPU/RAM/mobo then for sure. Also, this game likes the X-Fi sound cards- A LOT.

Posted Apr 15, 2007 1:47 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+1)
gunman357

I got a Radeon 9550 graphics card.....It works for me, but I gotta keep it down at 800x600.......Dang it.

Posted Apr 14, 2007 8:52 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
STICKMAN_345

7900GT would kill the 7300 GT in SLI, why? because its probably one of the fastest cards on the market. Yeah the 7600GT in SLI would just overtop the 7900GT. Its like saying the 6600GT in sli can beat the 8800GTX lol

Posted Apr 8, 2007 3:10 pm GMT
Login to rate this comment
/ (-1)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
« prevnext »
advertisement