ON BNET: Are you dressing like an underling?
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot: TGS 2008
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
TV.com
Metacritic

CPU

All of our Intel Core 2 CPUs handle Command & Conquer 3 with ease. When we jump down to the slower dual- and single-core Athlon 64s, performance takes a slight hit, while the Pentium 4 3.2GHz trails the pack significantly. Overall, the game seems relatively insensitive to processors, as we could play very easily on all of our machines. Feel free to make the CPU the last place you look to for an upgrade.

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

2048x1536, Very High Quality, 4xAA

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz
30
Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz
30
Core2 Duo 6300 @ 1.86GHz
30
Athlon FX-60 @ 2.60GHz
29
Athlon FX-57 @ 2.80GHz
27
Intel Pentium 4 @ 3.20GHz
24

System Setup: Intel Core 2 X6800, Intel Core 2 Duo 6300, Intel 975XBX2, Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz, Intel 955XE, AMD Athlon 64 FX-60, AMD Athlon 64 FX-57, ASUS A8R32-MVP Deluxe, Athlon 64 X2 5000+, Asus M2n32 SLI Deluxe, 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GB x 2), 160GB Seagate 7200.7 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows XP Professional SP2. Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 GTX, Nvidia ForceWare 97.72.

Memory

With 512MB of system RAM, our tip-top system became utterly unplayable until we reduced the graphical load. You'll have to turn down quite a few settings to get the game to run well. Jumping up to 1GB of RAM solves all the problems, anything more is wasted due to the frame rate cap.

Memory Performance Tests

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

2048x1536, Very High Quality, 4xAA

512MB Corsair XMS
21
1GB Corsair XMS
30
2GB Corsair XMS
30
4GB Corsair XMS
30

System Setup: Intel Core 2 X6800, Intel 975XBX2, 4GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GB x 4), 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GB x 2), Corsair XMS Memory 1GB, Corsair XMS Memory 512MB, 160GB Seagate 7200.7 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows XP Professional SP2. Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, Nvidia ForceWare 97.92.



553 Comments

  • Da_Lench_Mob_1

    Posted Jul 2, 2008 8:19 pm GMT

    intel quad core 4 gigs
    x2 nvdia 8800GT's
    Vista

    I have 0 problems

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Dreamer1476

    Posted Jul 2, 2008 8:06 pm GMT

    I have a 32-bit Operating System, Dual core 1 gig of ram, AMD Turion 64 X 2 Tech 1.9 Ghz running Windows Vista Home and after playing the game for about 20 min it slows down ALOT. What can I do to fix this problem.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • selfdestruct-10

    Posted Jun 25, 2008 10:02 pm GMT

    Please check if my system can handle the game:
    Pentium 4 3.0ghz
    4*512mb DDR2 kingmax RAM
    Asus geforce 7300gs 256mb
    I appreciate every comment.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • vortex_gw

    Posted Jun 15, 2008 12:27 am GMT

    I have Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3GHz/6Mb cache L2; Nvidia 8800GT 512MB 256bit; 2 GB RAM DDR2 and OS Windows XP SP2 32bit. The game runs pretty smoothly up to 4 players(Oh at Ultra High Settings 4xAA). But when there are more than 4 players and ton of units on the map => Slow Motion baby X_X

    P.S.- alfi290292, my brother has AMD x2 4400+ 2.1GHz/1Mb cache L2; Nvidia 8500GT 256MB; 2GB RAM and he runs the game at HIGH SETTINGS with Shadows at Ultra High otherwise they SUCK. But I think even with 3 players or more and ton of units => Slow MOTION. He doesn't care though ^_^

    • Login to rate this comment
  • escape98sk8

    Posted May 25, 2008 4:17 pm GMT

    I have a Nvidia GeForce 6200 256 MB and a Intel Pentium 4 procesor, and 512 of Ram. I can play this game on medium quality with around 20-25 fps. After reading this feature, the only thing i need is upgrade to 1GB of Ram and I can reach the 30 fps. I hope thats correct, this game is awesome

    • Login to rate this comment
  • alfi290292

    Posted May 21, 2008 7:14 pm GMT

    need help, can i run this game in high quality with these specs:

    Intel Dual Core 2.2 ghz
    2 gb DDR2 ram
    nVidia 8600GT 256mb
    i really hope i can play this game in high quality with 8600GT, someone please answer.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • mfenix130

    Posted May 21, 2008 3:20 am GMT

    command and conquer 3 kane's edition crashes after sometime to desktop and gives an error message that cnc3.dat has caused an error and it will now close.2 options given below are send error report, don't send.
    i play it on medium settings at 1024*768 resolution and it works great for the time it runs, no lags at all.
    the specs are
    core 2 duo 2.2 ghz
    intel 945 motherboard
    2gb ddr2 ram
    nvidia geforce 7300 gs 256mb graphics card
    160 gb hard drive.
    even after i send error report nothing happens.i'm using version 1 of the game.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • rtssam

    Posted May 20, 2008 9:17 am GMT

    darn im runnin on a 128mb geforce 7300 le and it laggs badly on defualts so i have to put shadows and such off

    • Login to rate this comment
  • mochaloca

    Posted May 13, 2008 4:36 am GMT

    Nope you arnt the only one never-named. Im runin it with 1 gig of DDR and a radeon 9250

    • Login to rate this comment
  • freeshep

    Posted May 11, 2008 5:03 am GMT

    mmm wonder if it'll work on my x3100 graphic powered laptop - i love c&c games and dawn of war runs at high quality

    • Login to rate this comment
  • jared3164

    Posted Apr 7, 2008 4:17 pm GMT

    This game can run on very modest systems. I run it at 800x600 res all settings on low. And i get an average of 26 Fps. If you have anything more than this you can run this game.

    Pentium 4 2.6 Ghz HT. 1.5 GB DDR400 RAM
    Geforce fx5200 (crap card)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Moussi11

    Posted Apr 5, 2008 3:16 pm GMT

    @snake356

    It probably would work, but on all low 800 x600. If I were you, I'd get a 7600 GT (pretty cheap, seem go for 60 $) or if you wanna go mid-high end then get a Radeon 3850 (150-180 $).

    6200 is pretty much useless these days.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • snake356

    Posted Apr 5, 2008 10:49 am GMT

    im geting geforce 6200 could someone tell me if it will work it helful to me

    • Login to rate this comment
  • raza_rizvi_002

    Posted Mar 27, 2008 9:46 am GMT

    man wen i had a fx5500 i ran this game on low at about 20 fps man, with 7300 gt im pretty sure u can..

    how can i play online ??? how do i get an ONLINE ID???

    • Login to rate this comment
  • rudeboy4000

    Posted Mar 26, 2008 6:52 am GMT

    can my 7300 gt run this game?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • raza_rizvi_002

    Posted Mar 26, 2008 1:48 am GMT

    wow i run it on full everything even AA, and i get no less than 30 fps, btw how can i get resolution to 2048x1536.

    i hav

    8800 gts 320 mb
    q6600
    2x2 gb 667mhz kingston
    asus p5k-e
    windows xp 32-bit

    • Login to rate this comment
  • bigjoeh

    Posted Mar 25, 2008 7:17 am GMT

    JamezMan -

    I am playing the game on a system 99% identical to yours - same CPU & GPU, with 3 GB RAM, and I run the game with EVERY setting completely maxed (including AA) at 1680x1050 without so much as a hiccup. All I can suggest is make sure all of your hardware drivers are up-to-date, and make sure you've installed the 1.9 patch.

    Also, make sure your system is properly maintained. Software like Diskeeper, RegCleaner and Driver Cleaner Pro can make a big difference. FYI, I've found TweakGuides.com to be a great resource for getting the most out of your PC in general - Vista or XP - with guides for a few specific games.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • pretender_idol

    Posted Mar 18, 2008 1:18 pm GMT

    can i play it on a geforce 8500 gt?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • JamezMan

    Posted Feb 22, 2008 6:35 pm GMT

    Hey lads, I'm experiencing some lagging issues with this game when I put all the settings to high, one or two to ultra and the resolution 1280 X 1024. I have a Core 2 Quad Processor 2.4Ghz E 6600, 2 GB dual channel RAM and a GeForce 8800 GT 512 mb and I want to be able to push the settings to as far as they would go. Do you know what could be wrong? Cheers.

    Luke.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • viper101222

    Posted Feb 22, 2008 1:06 pm GMT

    i have a celeron d and 512 ram and it wont even install it keeps saying error reading the cd rom mp cab corrupt anyone know what i should do?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Nunamaker

    Posted Jan 22, 2008 9:56 pm GMT

    Well, i got a x2 5600+, 2 GB ram, 8600GTS, and i can run it smoothly 1280x1024 with all things on high and antialiasing on a lil bit.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • PuffstaJones

    Posted Jan 16, 2008 8:17 pm GMT

    I run it with 2GB RAM, dual core 2.8 GHz and my disgusting GeForce 7300 LE. It slows on medium so I play on low settings and now my keyboard has vomit on it.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Schools_out

    Posted Jan 14, 2008 8:42 am GMT

    I play this game on my pentium 4, 3.4GHz, 2Gb of RAM and my GeForce 8800 GTS 640Mb, and I still can't max it out. I need a dual core processor for it to work smoothly. I tried it at my cousins, he has 2.2GHz dual core and I can max it out.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • xdeer

    Posted Jan 12, 2008 9:52 pm GMT

    i run with -pentium 4 (2.60ghz)
    -1 gb ram
    -ati radeon 9550 (256mb)

    and still suck,when i try to maxed it,the game become to damn slow so i lower the game settings to play it....(sigh)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Phoenix-wiki

    Posted Jan 12, 2008 4:14 pm GMT

    I run it with 512 RAM, pentium 4 processor and an NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 graphics card (128mb) and it works really great

    • Login to rate this comment
  • _Alpha_Omega_

    Posted Jan 7, 2008 2:12 am GMT

    Is it will run in my computer?
    I'm using AMD Athlon 2100+, 1 GB of RAM, ATi Radeon 9800Pro, Windows XP Pro (SP1), DX 9.0.
    Coz I'm planning to buy this game...

    • Login to rate this comment
  • yogi252

    Posted Dec 30, 2007 3:04 pm GMT

    Mmmm...this game runs good on medium settings. Graphics are good. I can do it with my ATI Xpress 1200 at 320 mb. If I choose the ultra high standarts, well, I can appreciate the graphics, but the game is very slow, of course. More RAM or a new CPU.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • garbe

    Posted Dec 28, 2007 6:52 pm GMT

    it doesn't even work on my computer... =(

    • Login to rate this comment
  • DeadPhoenix86

    Posted Dec 28, 2007 1:27 pm GMT

    this game runs perfect here on mids settings and shadow on and 1024x768 resolution xD

    • Login to rate this comment
  • micknator

    Posted Dec 27, 2007 4:23 am GMT

    I have a 8600GT and it does the job to have mooth play combined with high settings.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • jerfaceisugli

    Posted Dec 25, 2007 12:15 pm GMT

    i hope an 8600 gt will max dis puppy out

    • Login to rate this comment
  • jerfaceisugli

    Posted Dec 25, 2007 12:13 pm GMT

    Wow, u cant even see the rocks on very low quality. feel bad for any sucker who got to play it on that

    • Login to rate this comment
  • jerfaceisugli

    Posted Dec 25, 2007 12:10 pm GMT

    I used to be running this on 128 mb graphics card, pentium core (not dual core), on a dell laptop and it ran maxed out.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • rokkuman09

    Posted Dec 23, 2007 11:55 am GMT

    grootlaar, you should be able to run it at it's highest settings, but how much RAM do you have, I couldn't understand what you were saying. Also you should look into getting a new processor, Pentium 4s aren't very good for gaming and even the cheapest of Core 2 Duos (about $130) will be many times faster than your P4. Currently, your system will bottleneck at your processor in many games.

    • Login to rate this comment
  • grootelaar

    Posted Dec 23, 2007 1:55 am GMT

    why those gamespot dosn't take a very low pic and when you place the courser over it a very high pic

    • Login to rate this comment
  • grootelaar

    Posted Dec 23, 2007 1:53 am GMT

    how will a geforce 8800 GT with pentium 4 2.0 Ghz 515,5 MR RAM

    • Login to rate this comment
  • KoM-EgeN

    Posted Dec 21, 2007 8:57 pm GMT

    I need a new POwer supply to run this. Other than that i have a budget gaming system (slightly obslete):Intel P4 HT, Kingston 1Gb DDR, ati x1950 pro & 250 watts psu T_T

    i think if i get a new psu my pc can last for another year i guess

    • Login to rate this comment
  • KoM-EgeN

    Posted Dec 21, 2007 8:54 pm GMT

    I need a new POwer supply to run this. Other than that i have a budget gaming system (slightly obslete):Intel P4 HT, Kingston 1Gb DDR, ati x1950 pro & 250 watts psu T_T

    • Login to rate this comment
  • yogi252

    Posted Dec 16, 2007 3:43 pm GMT

    ATI Xpress 1200 at 320 mb works fine?

    • Login to rate this comment
  • mnesca

    Posted Nov 27, 2007 10:08 am GMT

    Q6600 4gb ram 8800gt with 24" monitor, runs perfect at 1600*1200

    • Login to rate this comment
  • AresP17

    Posted Nov 21, 2007 2:00 pm GMT

    could someone tell me a good place to buy a 1g ram and a really good graphics card and if you know the price please tell me, but it has to be less than $500

    • Login to rate this comment
  • AresP17

    Posted Nov 21, 2007 1:42 pm GMT

    i just installed it and i works well on 1152 resolution at medium only though

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Nomad0404

    Posted Nov 21, 2007 8:31 am GMT

    Kezuya - wait and get an ATI A3850 should be about £115 when they come out - if you can stretch for it though go for a 8800 GT, you can get the BFG overclocked version on Amazon for £160.

    AresP17 - I can't see why not but don't go silly on the resolution and check your medium and high settings - the shaders may get you!

    Jocarl1215 - You have a nice system but it's clear that it'll run max on a system of far less spec than that so you aren't proving anything.

    Pretend_idol - Possibly but it'll look poor and the resolution won't go so high. You might get away with 1024x768 with medium settings but I suspect not.

    Davcal - depending on your graphics port if you have PCI-E and a low budget I'd wait for the ATI A3850s.

    Phil

    • Login to rate this comment
  • AresP17

    Posted Nov 20, 2007 7:25 pm GMT

    hey i have a celeron d 3.2gh cpu 512 ram ati x1900 and 250 hard drive would it work well on my computer

    • Login to rate this comment
  • Jocarl1215

    Posted Nov 12, 2007 3:57 am GMT

    Intel 945G, Intel Pentium Dual-Core @ 1.60 Ghz and i have Asrock motherboard (Conroe1333-D667) Geforce 8800 GTX 2GB of RAm Works at MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE

    • Login to rate this comment
  • T0x1kFury

    Posted Oct 8, 2007 8:24 pm GMT

    The frame rate cap was a move made by EA so that the game is more playable online, as it increases the synchronization between machines of very different abilities (say a low end system that can play med setting at 30 FPS, and a high end system that could play very high settings at like 40 or 50)

    by capping it reduces lagg and also increases game performance (don't ask how, I don't know much about the tech behind the cap, just hte reasonings)

    • Login to rate this comment
  • rut3

    Posted Oct 8, 2007 9:15 am GMT

    Why is there a frame rate cap? What's the point?

    • Login to rate this comment
advertisement
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars Boxshot
Command & Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars

Game Stats

Full Game Details »Close
Also on

Related Content

Matches based on text similarity.

Tags