Posted Oct 25, 2009 4:18 am GMT (hide)

xbox is much better in this game

• agree 1
• disagree 13
• = -12
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 24, 2009 3:43 pm GMT (hide)

Yep. Hacker.

I have had all of mine be marked -10. Exactly.

Where would I report this?

• agree 1
• disagree 11
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 16, 2009 4:01 pm GMT (hide)

It's funny: I have looked through the "marked as spam" comments, and it seems to me there are quite a bit of very high quality comments hidden in there! Maybe it's all of the Ps3/360 Fanboy unions coming in as a group and marking them all as bad... who knows?

Notice how almost ALL of the marked comments are exactly +0 and -10. Seems to me like a Union Raid, or a Hacker... having zero + points on very good, non-biased points, and EXACTLY -10 on dozens in a row.

• agree 3
• disagree 10
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 16, 2009 3:59 pm GMT (hide)

LinuxOS137 had a VERY good point:
"you know, most of these ps3 graphics problems can be fixed if you enable "super contrast", and "RGB HDMI FULL" in display settings. once enabled you will immediately notice deeper blacks, more colors and better shadows."

• agree 3
• disagree 10
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 16, 2009 3:57 pm GMT (hide)

I love gamespot, but I must say, whenever they said (mainly for the game COD4) the difference is negligible, that is ALWAYS when the Ps3 emerges!

Now, they need an article stating on the 46% failure rate of Xbox 360's, compared to the 13% failure rate of Ps3. Maybe they could write an article about how the Ps3 has FREE online, bluetooth, blu-ray, and FREE connection to wireless internet. Not to mention a much cleaner, more business-looking template for their menu system.

Did I mention FREE ONLINE??

• agree 3
• disagree 11
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 13, 2009 8:56 am GMT (hide)

ps3 should look better in multiplatform games too but oddly thats never the case. only exclusive developers really try to suck the power out of the console.

• agree 1
• disagree 10
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 13, 2009 8:09 am GMT (hide)

There doesn't look to be much of a significant different between the two, not much to be causing all hate full comments below. I don't get some people.

• agree 3
• disagree 10
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Oct 10, 2009 5:05 am GMT (hide)

PS3 Wins

• agree 1
• disagree 11
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 29, 2009 9:45 pm GMT (hide)

I LIKE XBOX 360 MORE........................................

• agree 2
• disagree 12
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 26, 2009 9:41 pm GMT (hide)

I own both systems and Assassins Creed on both, it was free with both lol. It is very easy for a real gamer to see the diffrence, and here is what I see here and what I see when I play both versions: Detail = 360 - Shading = 360 = Draw Distance = 360 - Fps = PS3 - Character Detail = 360 - Controls = 360 - Anti Aliasing = 360. But remeber this is just for Assassins Creed game, and the game is not made for the two consoles, it just depends on what the developers try harder for and the hardware for the game itself.

• agree 3
• disagree 12
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 22, 2009 3:56 am GMT (hide)

That's right LinuxOS137. People should ignore the brightness/contrast 'issues' because they are not issues, but instead focus on what is said about textures, detail, framerate etc.

• agree 1
• disagree 10
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 20, 2009 2:49 pm GMT (hide)

you know, most of these ps3 graphics problems can be fixed if you enable "super contrast", and "RGB HDMI FULL" in display settings. once enabled you will immediately notice deeper blacks, more colors and better shadows.

• agree 5
• disagree 11
• = -6
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 18, 2009 5:49 pm GMT (hide)

i have a ps3 and could be considered a fanboy
but in most cases the graphics are almost completely the same if not the xbox wins out

• agree 3
• disagree 11
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 13, 2009 2:59 pm GMT (hide)

gamespot is biased

• agree 3
• disagree 12
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 4, 2009 5:09 pm GMT (hide)

cyclonebw, a game isn't just copied to a blue-ray disc to run on the ps3. Each console has their own system architecture, which requires some adjustment to a game's programing in order to run properly on another system. Therefore, a game will almost never appear exactly the same when it is run on different consoles.

• agree 4
• disagree 11
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Sep 1, 2009 6:39 pm GMT (hide)

You know whats funny? A game is copied to a dual-layer and a blueray so its the same game right? Then why are we comparing graphics? Were comparing the same thing. The game isnt totally remade on another system, just copied.....

• agree 4
• disagree 14
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 30, 2009 10:08 pm GMT (hide)

the 360 has a cooler looking hooded guy.

• agree 1
• disagree 12
• = -11
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 28, 2009 2:22 pm GMT (hide)

graphic is not all of the game and you can not see the differents in picture.

• agree 3
• disagree 11
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 27, 2009 9:36 pm GMT (hide)

The xbox looks better the ps3 seems a little white washed. That brightness everyone talking about isn't a good thing. The contrast is too low duh?

• agree 0
• disagree 13
• = -13
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 27, 2009 9:35 pm GMT (hide)

The xbox looks better the ps3 seems a little white washed. That brightness everyone talking about isn't a good thing. The contrast is too low duh?

• agree 0
• disagree 13
• = -13
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 27, 2009 3:32 pm GMT (hide)

I like both of them, they both equally give about the same, except the ps3 is little brighter

• agree 3
• disagree 11
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 26, 2009 9:55 pm GMT (hide)

yeah i think they are a little biased against the ps3, when i was reading the top summery i though wow the ps3 is falling behind but when i looked at the pictures it wasnt as bad as they made it seem and somtimes it seemed the ps3 was the one that won.

p.s. i have dont have either system i have a wii so im not biased

• agree 2
• disagree 11
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 25, 2009 8:31 am GMT (hide)

Seriously though, look at my comment on the first round comparison, not saying that they are biased but do any of you think that gamespot may be biased towards the PS3? no disrespect to gamespot and xbox fanboys.

• agree 2
• disagree 10
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 25, 2009 8:27 am GMT (hide)

Xbox360 makes you happy now but the PS3 is the console of the future, makes you happier now till then.

• agree 2
• disagree 10
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 24, 2009 1:30 pm GMT (hide)

if you look carefully you can easily tell that the ps3 has less jagged lining on the characters and buildings and it looks brighter, so i think on the screenshots i think the ps3 has the upperhand ps3 ftw

• agree 2
• disagree 11
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 23, 2009 9:10 am GMT (hide)

xbox360=now.............PS3= the future, you cant deny that.

• agree 1
• disagree 11
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 23, 2009 9:10 am GMT (hide)

xbox360=now.............PS3= the future, you cant deny that.

• agree 1
• disagree 11
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 22, 2009 3:43 pm GMT (hide)

I must say I like the graphics on the PS3 a little better. I appreciate the effort but isn't it 2009? Is there any games from 09 that can be used, like SF4 or Fight Night R4 or Prototype? I like some of the comparisons, but most of these games were made before developers could catch up to PS3's hardware capabilities. I'd like to see a company admit that they pushed their game to the limit on the PS3 because thay had more resources to available to do so. When that happens I think I will care about graphical comparisons a lot more. Madden 08?? Orange Box??. Burnout???. Assasins Creed??? How many titles are better comarisons that have dropped in the last year a so than these? Not pissed I just would like to see things evened out a little better. These developers are underdeveloping titles on the PS3 just to save money and to save face. (Opinion) They don't want a system war on account of them making a game look better on one system that would be bad for business. (Opinion also)

• agree 2
• disagree 11
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 22, 2009 8:12 am GMT (hide)

I gotta say I like PS3 system what u can PS3 u know download staff from the internet in your PS3 system but don't like PSN But I do like xbox live but my 360 is broke right now but I own PS3 now but still and all they all look the same but PS3 got a little lightening but Need for Speed Pro, Rainbow Six Vegas 2 and GTA 4 is better on the 360

• agree 1
• disagree 10
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 22, 2009 7:46 am GMT (hide)

hmm dont know about gta 4 they both look pretty good.....

• agree 0
• disagree 10
• = -10
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 22, 2009 7:44 am GMT (hide)

the orange box on ps3???????? xbox 360???????????

• agree 1
• disagree 10
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 22, 2009 7:41 am GMT (hide)

i think both consles are great i think the war between them should stop

• agree 2
• disagree 10
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 16, 2009 6:18 pm GMT (hide)

The xbox 360 looks the best no matter what the fanboys say

• agree 0
• disagree 13
• = -13
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 12, 2009 10:06 pm GMT (hide)

All the PS3 images look brighter and more washed out. I think there may be a problem with the capturing done on the PS3 because there is no way the PS3 can be really that far behind the 360 in texture quality. I can see this might happen on some games but virtually every PS3 screenshot was the same way.

• agree 3
• disagree 11
• = -8
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 12, 2009 5:47 pm GMT (hide)

something is wrong...

• agree 4
• disagree 11
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 12, 2009 2:39 pm GMT (hide)

Graphics really don't matter to me, it's all about the games.

• agree 4
• disagree 11
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Aug 4, 2009 2:11 pm GMT (hide)

wow what happened to all the coments

• agree 3
• disagree 10
• = -7
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Jul 19, 2009 7:39 am GMT (hide)

@zskrabs24

the pc is even more powerful than both consoles, yet show me the pc version of a multiformat game which is 'brought down' to the weaker 360 and ps3.

if one version is being 'brought down' as you claim, then that console should run the SAME game BETTER, but thats not happening. look at a game like ut3, it came out on pc and ps3 first. those with a powerful pc could run that game at higher resolutions, with higher res textures, more effects and better framerates than the ps3 version. so the pc version was not brought down becuase of the ps3. and then a 360 version was released 6 months later, and it ran ut3 as good as the ps3, like many multiformat games.

exclusives can push the hardware more than most multiformat games, but exclusives mostly shows what great devs can do on great hardware, it does not tell you which hardware is the best. killzone2 and haze are fps exclusives on the SAME console, but no way is haze in the same league as killzone2 graphically. so if haze was a 360 exclusive, it would be no better than the ps3 version. but put guerilla to work on the 360 like they did on the ps3, and they could get results out of the 360 just as good as they have on the ps3.

so give the devs some respect please and dont act like its all down to the hardware, cause its not, its what the devs can DO on the hardware that counts.

and lastly, there is nothing unfair about comparing multiformat games.

• agree 2
• disagree 13
• = -11
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Jul 16, 2009 11:09 am GMT (hide)

you can't compare multiplatform games. which ever is more powerful is being brought down to the level of the weaker one as a rule. no crap there aren't many differences because it is the same damn game dumb ass. the only way to truly compare graphics is through exclusive games. but that is also kind of unfair and sort of biased and hard to compare. screw game stop and its graphics comparisons. they are extremely unfair and biased. fair and balanced GS, learn what that means please.

• agree 3
• disagree 12
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Jul 15, 2009 6:10 pm GMT (hide)

Ya, I do have to say that the Xbox 360 was a little better or was a tie for all of them except Rainbow Six Vegas 2, that looked awful on the PS3.

• agree 2
• disagree 11
• = -9
• Sign in to rate this comment