ON CBS.com: HD may burn your eyes
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
TV.com
Metacritic

The PC gaming industry is undergoing a transition period, but that isn't slowing down the pace of graphics innovation. The industry is shifting from retail to digital distribution, and the current generation of consoles have adopted many features previously available only on the PC, such as HD graphics and pervasive online multiplayer support. The current consoles are much stronger competition in this time around, but the PC platform is up to the challenge. Industry heavyweights including Microsoft, Activision, Intel, Nvidia, and AMD have formed the PC Gaming Alliance to reinvigorate PC gaming by making it easier and more accessible to gamers. The PC still has its greatest advantage, a steady stream of new CPUs and GPUs that ensure that the PC platform's computational power is always several generations ahead of the consoles. Nvidia has increased the PC graphics lead one step further with today's release of the first GeForce 200 series GPU, the GeForce GTX 280.

The GeForce GTX 280 takes over for the GeForce 9800 GTX as Nvidia's latest and most powerful DirectX 10 GPU. The new GeForce GTX 280 actually compares best with the GeForce 9800 GX2 which has two GeForce 9800 GTX processors on a single card. The GeForce 9 series might be the most short-lived Nvidia GeForce generation we've ever seen, but the GeForce 9's brief life span makes sense when you consider that the GeForce 9800 GTX GPU was basically a die shrink of the GeForce 8800 GTX with some minor memory-interface revisions. Shrinking the die is an efficiency play that moves an existing chip design to a newer manufacturing process and results in smaller chips. The die shrink reduces costs because more chips can fit onto each silicon wafer, and it can often increase GPU performance because smaller chips can achieve higher operating speeds.

GeForce 9800 GX2 owners might want to avert their eyes.

The GeForce GTX 280 has 240 stream processors, almost double the number of processors on the GeForce 9800 GTX, and Nvidia has optimized the new chip architecture to squeeze even more performance out of each processor. Nvidia bumped up the onboard memory to 1GB for a single GPU and widened the memory interface to 512-bit to improve performance at high resolutions with antialiasing enabled. The performance doesn't come cheap--the GeForce GTX 280 comes with a very top-of-the-line $649 MSRP. However, the GTX 280 is only half of the GeForce GTX 200 launch. Nvidia plans to release the slightly less powerful, but much more affordable GeForce GTX 260 next week on June 26, 2008. The $399 GeForce GTX 260 will have 192 stream processors, 896MB of memory, and a 448-bit memory interface.

The GTX 280 continues Nvidia's commitment to evolving the video card into a more consumer-friendly product. The entire dual-slot card is encased in a glossy, molded shell, and the new design hides the card's SLI connector and audio port beneath rubberized covers. It's really only a matter of time before a designer extends out the shell to hide the PCI Express connector, the last exposed portion of the card's PCB shame.

GPU GeForce GTX 280 GeForce GTX 260 GeForce 9800 GX2 GeForce 9800 GTX
Current price $649 $399 $499 $269
Processor cores 240 192 256 128
Processor clock 1.3GHz 1.24GHz 1.5GHz 1.69GHz
Core Clock 602MHz 576MHz 600MHz 675MHz
Memory 1GB 896MB 512MBx2 512MB
Memory Clock 2.2GHz(DDR) 2GHz(DDR) 2GHz(DDR) 2GHz(DDR)
Memory Interface 512-bit 488-bit 256-bit 256-bit

Nvidia added more open space around the 8-pin and 6-pin power connectors to accommodate larger power plugs. The GeForce 9800 cards had less clearance around the power connectors, which forced users to either find a power adapter or snap off the extra plastic to get power cables to seat properly. Nvidia recommends using a 550W power supply with at least 40A on the 12V rail for a single GeForce GTX 280. Cards will work in 2-way and 3-way SLI, provided you have an SLI-enabled motherboard with the appropriate number of PCI Express slots.

Rear Bracket       Power and Audio       SLI Connector       Card Back      

The card has two dual-link, HDCP-compliant DVI-I outputs and a 7-pin analog connector that can output S-Video as well as composite and component with the appropriate cable dongle. HDMI output comes via a DVI-to-HDMI adapter, but you'll need to jack a SPDIF audio feed to the top of the card if you want to get sound integrated into the HDMI-out. As with all recent Nvidia GPUs, the GeForce GTX 200 series has PureVideo support that provides full decode acceleration for all popular HD file formats.

The GTX 200 GPUs also have smarter power management features that can automatically detect and throttle the chip's power depending on how much 3D-performance the system needs. According to Nvidia, the GeForce 280 GTX will only consume 25-35W when running in desktop mode or while playing a Blu-ray movie, but it can ramp up to full power, approximately 236W, when it's time to fire up Call of Duty 4. The GTX 200 GPUs also support Nvidia's HybridPower feature that can switch all graphics work over to the motherboard graphics chip for low-intensity, nongaming applications provided you have a motherboard with an nForce 780a or 790i chipset.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 Performance

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

3DMark Vantage, Performance Test

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
10276
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
9521
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
10048
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
5879

3DMark Vantage, Extreme Test

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
4902
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
3509
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
3716
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
2102

3DMark06, 1280x1024

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
13811
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
14260
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
14451
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
13408

3DMark06, 2048x1535 4xAA/8xAF

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
9565
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
10544
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
10925
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
6636

Crysis, High Quality, 1600x1200, 4xAA

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
36
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
23
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
22
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
18

Call of Duty 4, Max Quality, 1920x1440, 4xAA

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
75
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
80
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
78
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
54

Team Fortress 2, High Quality, 2048x1536, 8xAA/16xAF

GeForce GTX 280 1GB
95
GeForce 9800 GX2 512MBx2
93
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI 512MBx2
83
GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB
73
System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650, EVGA 780 SLI motherboard, 2GB Corsair DDR2 (1GBx2), Seagate 7200.11 750GB Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1. Graphics Cards: GeForce GTX 280 1GB, GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB (512MBx2), GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB. Graphics Drivers: Nvidia ForceWare beta 177.26, Nvidia ForceWare 175.16.

The performance tests show us that the GeForce GTX 280's 240 stream processors are very capable of taking on 256 processors from the previous generation. The GeForce GTX 280 only has a slight lead over its competition in Call of Duty 4 and Team Fortress 2, but the newest GeForce shows what it can do in our most challenging tests, Crysis with high-quality settings and the new 3D Mark Vantage. Crysis has been the most graphically demanding game in our benchmark suite since its release late last year. Most cards struggle to maintain playable framerates at higher resolutions at the best image quality levels, but GeForce GTX 280 handles high-quality, 1600x1200 without a problem and actually makes antialiasing a viable option. The card does particularly well in the 3DMark Vantage Extreme test which sets the resolution to 1920x1200 and increases all shaders to “extreme” levels.

The video card isn't just about gaming anymore, either. Nvidia is currently working on expanding the video card's usefulness outside of graphics applications. The process started in the last generation with the launch of the CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture) initiative with the GeForce 8 series. CUDA opens up the GeForce GPU's processing power to non-graphics applications such as video transcoders, image manipulation programs, or any other work that can benefit from parallel processing. CUDA-enabled consumer applications are still rare, but there are a few promising programs on the horizon.

Software start-up Elemental Technologies is developing video transcoding software that uses the GPU to accelerate transcode times 10 to 20 times faster than CPU transcoding, and users participating in the Folding@Home program will soon be able to use their CUDA-enabled GPUs to start racking up the points at an incredible rate. If these two programs are a sign of things to come, it's not difficult to imagine a time when everyone will need to take non-gaming software support into account when buying a new video card.

The GeForce GTX 280 is your only choice if you're looking for the most powerful single-GPU available today. The GeForce GTX 280 matches up well against the dual-GPU GeForce 9800 GX2 in current games, but it seems like many of the 280's engine improvements won't become apparent until games start adopting 3DMark Vantage-level graphics workloads. The card also has plenty of non-gaming upside with its pending CUDA applications, but that also applies to all CUDA-enabled GeForce 8 and 9 series cards. The GeForce GTX 280's primary downside is its hefty $649 MSRP--pretty steep considering that you can get a GX2 for just under $500. For what it's worth, the GeForce 280's advanced power options will make the card more affordable to operate when you're not gaming.

491 Comments

  • Khantot

    Posted Aug 9, 2008 4:01 pm GMT

    Well, it's time to look for a second job. I hope Nvidia realized that not all of us have a second job to finance their new cards

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Sam_Fisher_932

    Posted Aug 9, 2008 3:33 pm GMT

    GTX 280 Price/Performance Value = Fail.
    HD 4870 Price/Performance Value = Win.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • WarGrad

    Posted Jul 30, 2008 1:38 pm GMT

    oliverwyattkim

    "Do you think a GTX 280 could run on a Q6600 system with a 650watt Antec Trio?"

    Read this article.
    http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX_280_and_GTX_260_Unleashed/

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • LILSMUCK

    Posted Jul 28, 2008 7:29 am GMT

    I had 2 9800 Gx2's, real world performance the 2-8800gtx's I got rid of were better.( I know the memory bandwith stinks thats why I'm back to the 8 series. )

    Know I have 2 8800 ultra's. I can't find and proof that the 280 gtx is better than the ultra so I'm staying with the tride and true. Flight simulater test and the ultra won...that is the only vs. testing I have seen.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • antoss

    Posted Jul 26, 2008 2:27 am GMT

    oliverwyattkim-sure do mate as i have that same cpu with the gtx280,2gb ram,running xp and my power supply is only 550w which is minimum.and the benchmarks i get are a little better than what this page shows.go for it this card is so super quick its worth evry penny.so many haters here saying its so expensive,i say get a job to them and shut up

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • oliverwyattkim

    Posted Jul 21, 2008 1:31 am GMT

    Do you think a GTX 280 could run on a Q6600 system with a 650watt Antec Trio?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • FstrthnU

    Posted Jul 9, 2008 9:00 pm GMT

    Yikes; GTX 280 really expensive (but still has better performance than 9800 GX2.) Still, I'd wait till the price drops (unless you're getting a GTX 260.) Still, consider that the Geforce 8800 Ultra several years ago was retailing for the same price as the GTX 280.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • rohan_mahdi

    Posted Jul 8, 2008 7:25 am GMT

    well , it's great , very great, but next time they should think about prices too it's too expensive

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • acarrillo

    Posted Jul 3, 2008 5:10 am GMT

    A Real mommy! but to expensive! but is nice

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree
  • chinaplayerGTA

    Posted Jul 2, 2008 6:35 pm GMT

    It is to expensive.It is too hot.you will need a aidcondiction.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • vijaynine

    Posted Jul 2, 2008 12:46 pm GMT

    For sure nvidia is emerging as one of the best chipmaker. Still it is a solid rocker at higher frame rates my 7900 GTX is still really a marvel.i would rather upgrade to GTX 280 This year to keep up the pace.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • javierkatana

    Posted Jun 25, 2008 11:53 pm GMT

    Yes, nVIDIA can make a gtx280 x2,but only by using a double pcb which drives costs 40%+ (512bit) compared to ATI that using a single pcb, only has to pay for the chip and better capacitors all at retail for $450 aprox, pay double and still get 2 4870 x2 crossfired at gtx280 x2 price point. Dont even think that nVIDIAs dual gpu will sell for less than $800.

    At most, 94 nVIDIA GT200 572mm2 die chips can be produced on a single 300mm $25000 wafer from TSMC (their outsourced world biggest chip foundry) using 65nm process, ATI gets 200+ 260mm2 4870 chips from TSMCs 300mm wafer using 55nm process, thats why nVIDIAs latest cards are so expensive, due to monstrous chip size. So you get doa at least from 7 of those 94, while ATI gets 7 dead out of 200.The result: ATI have created the new 9700 = stellar next gen performance for the masses while nVIDIA sells stellar old chips with massive discount, which helps competition but hurts in the long term when costumers realize how easily you can discount a recently launched product (-$100 9800gtx).

    About next gen stuff anything that CUDA supports like Photoshop, has already been accelerated by ATI, then add INTELs HAVOK licenced physics which out numbers nVIDIAs AGEIA game support 5 to 1 (150 vs 28 ). For the record I dumped my 3870 for 2 lovely 8800gt. Ive sold the GTs and got 2 4850 with discount at newegg for $170 each. 6 years after, once again ATI won the war by reconfiguring the rules, mainstream can play at high settings at any cyber cafe while the high end gets to play in 24" lcds and laugh but alone with 3 way gtx280 sli.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 4 users agree
  • varunaanatu-k

    Posted Jun 25, 2008 10:03 am GMT

    if i'm rich i might be able to get this and raplce my geforce 7300

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 3 users agree
  • perfect_chao

    Posted Jun 23, 2008 7:30 pm GMT

    GTX 280 is a joke, my 2 8800 GT's in SLi were alot cheaper and almost the same performance.

    Rather buy 2x 4870's when they come out.. will beat a gtx 280 no probs

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 6 of 6 users agree
  • haloshalo

    Posted Jun 23, 2008 5:41 pm GMT

    i will trade this for ati any given day?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 5 users agree
  • Black_Tribi

    Posted Jun 23, 2008 5:25 pm GMT

    Hmmm...nvidia is really pushing forward...maybe they're afraid of ATI?Always one step ahead....anyway...they should release a card that lasts on the throne a little longer, not so many 'versions' in such a short time that are only,to be honest, slightly better then the previous ones...waste of money imo.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • malexano

    Posted Jun 23, 2008 7:15 am GMT

    Why they do not show the performance comp. with the 9800 GX2 1024MB??
    Or the 8800 GTX 768MB ?
    I think won`t be much better.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 3 users agree
  • samedizombie

    Posted Jun 23, 2008 5:53 am GMT

    This is the same old story isn't it? The 9800 is barely out of the box, now another one 'hot off the press.' The trouble is that we never find out what these cards are actually capable of. Do NVIDIA think we're made of money? They obviously do, however. The trend is for more and more expensive toys, NVIDIA may find their plan to drive the technology forward may be scuppered by the global financial slowdown. I for one have no intention whatsoever to upgrade my 8800 GTX.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • Adam_the_Nerd

    Posted Jun 22, 2008 8:53 am GMT

    Daaaaaaamn. $650... I can pick up a last-gen 9800 for much, much cheaper.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • BigDoherz

    Posted Jun 22, 2008 4:34 am GMT

    $650 price tag is stupid, based on bang for buck ati's 4800 cards blow this out of the water

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 6 users agree
  • zackmax

    Posted Jun 21, 2008 9:52 pm GMT

    very expensive. New ati4850 and ati4870 much better in performance/price ratio. im sure later this card will drop!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 6 users agree
  • ldavidtw2000

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 1:31 pm GMT

    wait til end of the year and these will be like $200

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 7 of 8 users agree
  • momothewarchief

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 11:48 am GMT

    zzzz....new 1 again....i stick 2 my Ati 3870...

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 6 users agree
  • spank_my_bottom

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 9:08 am GMT

    I want a computer that can transform into a woman!!!!!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 9 of 10 users agree
  • Bloodrayne12

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 8:18 am GMT

    waste of money really

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 6 users agree
  • exorzz

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 6:49 am GMT

    dont cry about the prices
    they are high when you are an early adopter
    i payed 650 EURO for my 8800 gtx and now i can buy it for like 400 euro.
    this realy is an beast and if you wait a few moths it will be much cheaper .

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • liam72

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 5:26 am GMT

    One day... When I get some money...

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • bahaa_bg

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 4:22 am GMT

    ARRR, TRADE.... -)

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • bahaa_bg

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 4:20 am GMT

    I HAVE 4 NIVIDIA 8800 GTX, I WONT RADE THEM FOR THIS ONE, COZ THEY ARE SUCH A PERFORMERS

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 3 users agree
  • AshleyLV_11

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 3:54 am GMT

    or you could get 2 4850 in crossfire for 400$ (instead of 649$) get much better performance.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 5 users agree
  • captain110

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 2:46 am GMT

    hey man thats great. Nvidia is always there for us - PC Gamers!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 3 users agree
  • e1337prodigy

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 1:00 am GMT

    I stick with my 8800GT. Has to be the greatest graphics card I have purchased, cheap and awesome perfomance. AMD/ATi really need to catch up. We need the competition to drop the prices on these new releases it's getting ridiculous.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • greatwinner

    Posted Jun 20, 2008 12:49 am GMT

    Check the review of this card at www.guru3d.com. This comes down to be a real beast with new features (CUDA and PhyX) and the future. Although the price is crazy enough to start. I agree that for budget aware pc gamers time for upgrade needs to be right. So we will wait for the competion. Who knows maybe AMD will come up with something to shut up Nvidia. PC gamers FTW!

    My system:

    Windows XP SP2 ( best OS from Microsoft so far imo)
    Intel Q6600 (at 3.6Ghz on air, goes to 3.81 but not during CA summer)
    Zalman 9700 CPU Cooler
    EVGA 8800 GTS 512 (788 core 1060 x 2 memory)
    2GB 1066 Crucial Tracers
    150GB Raptor
    5.1 Surround Sound
    630 W Raidmax PSU
    Tsunami Dream Case (Thermaltake)

    Plays everything on 1280 x 1024 with max even crysis (tweaked a bit)

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 3 users agree
  • kirshna

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 10:16 pm GMT

    meh no pc game titles no more new gpu also pc gaming is expansive its good for rich people i happy with my old pc who run games ok,no more ubgrade

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 5 users agree
  • Savages_Havic

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 9:18 pm GMT

    I bought the Gx2 2 weeks ago for BFG OC version (680mhz) for 525, and Its really not that much of an improvement unless u have a 30in LCD monitor and play in huge resolutions. Though I play on a 20in, so the gx2 is more then enough. For an extra 150 dollars This card isnt worth the pricetag unless ur one of those people who have to have the newest and best of the best.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • wickathou

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 8:29 pm GMT

    Oh plz... this is a 8800 with more memory and new name...and "affordable" price... 650$...nothing new to see...

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 3 users agree
  • generaljw

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 8:02 pm GMT

    Why are console gamers reading this PC article criticizing the way us PC gamers play. I like consoles too and I can say the consoles have some of the best game titles ever but us PC gamers build our own PC's and its a whole different thing to just playing games on a console.
    Yes I know the market is very expensive but only a FOOL WOULD UPGRADE HIS GRAPHICS CARD EVERY TIME ANOTHER 1 CAME OUT. Your supposed to budget yourself and wait for the right time. Gamers who do that have no regrets and get what they pay for or more.And also, PC gamers should start taking advantage of EBAY. if a card costs £150 more than your happy to pay , then sell the card on ebay to contribute or make up the full cost. If you do things that way, then you could save a good £300 minimum on upgrading your whole computer and that's excluding purchases. If you purchase components from ebay or other cheap places, then the money you save adds up. SO CONSOLE GAMERS NEED TO STOP TALKING DOWN ABOUT THE PC. We know what we're doing and we know why we do it

    For people who prefer consoles and aren't that bothered about games overall than I encourage you to stick with consoles coz PC gaming can be costly and time consuming and in all truth, life has more important things in it but for those who are bothered about games, then don't speak down about PC gaming because it has its PROS AND CONS and a smart gamer will know how to balance those PROS AND CONS.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 9 of 10 users agree
  • jknight5422

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 7:31 pm GMT

    Those prices are ridiculous. What's next, the $2000 video card?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 6 users agree
  • shadystxxx

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 5:24 pm GMT

    Im happy with my system at the moment, i can run every game out except crysis at a res of 1280x1024(i use a 42" LG hdtv for my pc and consoles i dont have a monitor, the tv does 1080i but cannot get 1920x1080 on the pc so 1280x1024 is the best i can get) i can run crysis on 90% max settings but i have to turn a few things down to get a decent frame rate.

    Windows vista ultimate 64
    Q6600 quad core OC@ 3.0Ghz
    2X BFG 8800GT's OC version
    4GB OCZ platinum XTC DDR2
    Gigabyte Nforce mother board(i forget the model number)
    Hiper r-type 630w PSW
    5.1 creative sound card
    Also got some upgraded cooling devices all put into a coolermaster stacker 830 nvidia special edition.

    Im happy with that system for now, it was not long ago that i built it so i have no plans on upgrading anytime soon, well untill a game comes out i just have to play and my current system cannot handle it looking at least 90% at its best, crysis made me build a new system im a sucker for pretty graphics.

    Also its funny how some people can get crysis running at max no probs with a system thats basicly twice as weak as mine and i cannot have it running at max while maintaining a good frame rate, i can run crysis at max and it plays ok'ish but it stutters quite a bit during large fire fights thats why i need to tone down a few settings to high from very high.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 4 users agree
  • marcusnjunk

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 5:22 pm GMT

    ati 4870 owns this big time! this test doesn't show real game performance.
    just look at other tests.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 4 users agree
  • ADionne

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 4:48 pm GMT

    I can run Crysis, Assassin's Creed on max settings, granted i get the rare slow down's in Crysis. My system specs:
    XP Pro full version with the 3rd service pack
    Asus M2N-E, Athlon 64 X2 6400, OCZ Game X Stream 700 PS
    EVGA 7900GTX 512mb, 2Gb OCZ Platinum XTC Rev. 2 PC2-6400 DDR2-800, CL SB X-FI Xtreme Audio 24BIT, Syncmaster 225BW 22"Widescreen
    Plus running at max resolution while gaming 1680 x 1050. So i believe i'm good till 2010 before i need to upgrade my system again. Which by then who knows what is hot or what is coming. That's the problem with technology, no consumer can bloody keep up. So cheers peeps.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 8 users agree
  • Raven87

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 4:28 pm GMT

    It would have been nice if they ran the 260s numbers as well, i'm considering a new system and if it compared well to the 9 series then it'd be alot more tempting than the 280. Its' specs imply that it could compete favourably.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 2 users agree
  • cccp1988

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 4:04 pm GMT

    ULTIMO36
    i believe you because i got 7600gts whit ~+20% tuning core and memory(riva tuner) and i can tell i also can play all games in 1280*1024 maximum or maximum/high setting exept Crysis wich is killed my PC and Lost Planet, DIRT (maybe GRID is also got bad frame rate dont try it yet),oblivion when i playd craysis i neaded too put res on 1024*768 + i changed all setting in WINDOWS (you know somebody use et too get DX10 on XP i am for better performance) but even whit this magic i cant finish the game because fps is lover than 15fps now
    On the other side games like this UT3 runs around 45 fps, TCRainbowSvegas 30fps, C&C3 runs awesome good, Biosock 27 fps COD4 40fps, GeoW 45 fps(really unexpected from my PC too running Xbox360 games sou well)
    some more about my PC:
    CPU:AMD3500+ 1 core 2000mhz+~20% tuning (bios)
    GPU:7600nvidia GTX gddr3 core500 mhzmemory 1400mhz 128 bit
    RAM:3500mb DDR II 800 mhz

    *--for Crysis i used Windows 64 bit

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 4 users agree
  • Stickman116

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 4:02 pm GMT

    Hi Ultimo, you can get an 8800GT 512Mb for less that $200, it would go great with your system and the resolution you play at. I'm only having to get the higher end stuff because of the graphics work I do which requires a higher res monitor...

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • ultimo36

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 3:58 pm GMT

    i don't mean to be insulting btw, patrickstat. so if i have i apologise. most gamers aren't able to afford to buy now either. great if you can. butyea cod4 plays well with very little lag at all. i am also aware that my other system components prolly contribute more than my gfx tbh. got an intel core 2 duo e6750 2.66ghz cpu and 3gigs ram. no overclocking. soming someone else said below about newer cards knocking the older ones down in price hit home and i looked at my preffered retailer. the 9 series cards are a bit steep still but the 8800s are looking tempting for me on a budget basis.
    and maybe one day splash out on the penultimate card that runs crysis at 50-60fps whenever that happens. but yes...each to their own i guess

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • patrickstat

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 3:53 pm GMT

    and yes sell now because i was talking a a friend who seels cards in his shop that i buy my cards from for my shop and he will be getting the 8800 cards for every cheeps in a few months. that means the price will drop heaps. then you will sell for peenuts.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • patrickstat

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 3:49 pm GMT

    ahh thats ok with one graphics card it even super. the gtx280...ahhhh so tempting hu?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • Stickman116

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 3:48 pm GMT

    Thanks Patrickstat, I have an Antec Power Trio 650 watt power supply with three 12v rails = 59amps. I think that's enough.

    Thanks for the input. I just hope this all works out.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree



advertisement
Click Here

Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 Hands-On

Find out about Nvidia's next-generation GeForce GTX 280 GPU and see how it performs!

Tags