Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsComputer Hardware Discussion › ATI 07 complete lineup(with prices)

The Computer Hardware forum is the place to discuss hardware. Important! Asking for Windows keys or circumventing the copy-protect to accommodate multiple installs can lead to a moderation with revoked community permissions.

ATI 07 complete lineup(with prices)

Forum Actions
  • Level 59
    Virtual Hustler
    Posts: 3173
    Feb 25, 2007 11:04 pm GMT

    frost_mourne13 wrote:
    dahwnpapaya wrote:
    So if my budget is around $180 then what card would that be? and what is the will be the nvidia equivelent for that?
    Probably the 8600GT or 8900GS... same as it was for 7600GT and 7900GS: Kings of the Mid-range market...

    but what ati card is around $180 cus arent the ones on the list in yen

    [QUOTE="frost_mourne13"][QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]So if my budget is around $180 then what card would that be? and what is the will be the nvidia equivelent for that?[/QUOTE] Probably the 8600GT or 8900GS... same as it was for 7600GT and 7900GS: Kings of the Mid-range market...[/QUOTE]

    but what ati card is around $180 cus arent the ones on the list in yen

  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:04 pm GMT
    the specs should be right, but they were just unsure of the naming conventions and took it that they would follow through like the previous generation, but with the official 411 from DAAMIT, just take it that the x2800xtx is the x2900xtx
    the specs should be right, but they were just unsure of the naming conventions and took it that they would follow through like the previous generation, but with the official 411 from DAAMIT, just take it that the x2800xtx is the x2900xtx :)
  • Level 34
    Paramecium
    Posts: 5353
    Feb 25, 2007 11:04 pm GMT
    dahwnpapaya wrote:
    So if my budget is around $180 then what card would that be? and what is the will be the nvidia equivelent for that?

    Yeah most likely a 8600Ultra or GT.

    [QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]So if my budget is around $180 then what card would that be? and what is the will be the nvidia equivelent for that?[/QUOTE] Yeah most likely a 8600Ultra or GT.
  • Level 23
    Super Bagman
    Posts: 1637
    Feb 25, 2007 11:07 pm GMT
    Only if the Ultra isn't just a mean rumor. And i thought the list was in US dollars...
    Windows ____: Bill Gates Signature Version!

    Only if the Ultra isn't just a mean rumor. And i thought the list was in US dollars...
  • Level 59
    Virtual Hustler
    Posts: 3173
    Feb 25, 2007 11:09 pm GMT

    frost_mourne13 wrote:
    Only if the Ultra isn't just a mean rumor. And i thought the list was in US dollars...

    yeah, looking at it now that's to low to be in yen

    [QUOTE="frost_mourne13"]Only if the Ultra isn't just a mean rumor. And i thought the list was in US dollars...[/QUOTE]

    yeah, looking at it now that's to low to be in yen

  • Level 17
    Minus World
    Posts: 2703
    Feb 25, 2007 11:10 pm GMT
    Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?

    _____________________________________

    PC: Intel Pentium D 930, 2GB RAM, 200GB HDD, ATI Radeon X1650 PRO, Vista Premium

    Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:11 pm GMT
    dahwnpapaya wrote:

    frost_mourne13 wrote:
    Only if the Ultra isn't just a mean rumor. And i thought the list was in US dollars...

    yeah, looking at it now that's to low to be in yen



    I thought i was a chinese leak, yen?
    [QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]

    [QUOTE="frost_mourne13"]Only if the Ultra isn't just a mean rumor. And i thought the list was in US dollars...[/QUOTE]

    yeah, looking at it now that's to low to be in yen

    [/QUOTE] I thought i was a chinese leak, yen?
  • Level 34
    Paramecium
    Posts: 5353
    Feb 25, 2007 11:12 pm GMT
    Cyborg-21 wrote:
    Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?

    I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?

    [QUOTE="Cyborg-21"]Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?[/QUOTE] I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?
  • Level 23
    Super Bagman
    Posts: 1637
    Feb 25, 2007 11:13 pm GMT
    I heard that somewhere...Well it's a good time as ever to release a 2 in 1 Card, at least it wont be over as quickly as the 7950GX2...
    Windows ____: Bill Gates Signature Version!

    I heard that somewhere...Well it's a good time as ever to release a 2 in 1 Card, at least it wont be over as quickly as the 7950GX2...
  • Level 17
    Minus World
    Posts: 2703
    Feb 25, 2007 11:14 pm GMT
    Generalkill8888 wrote:
    Cyborg-21 wrote:
    Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?

    I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?


    Just have a look at the top-most card in that chart.

    _____________________________________

    PC: Intel Pentium D 930, 2GB RAM, 200GB HDD, ATI Radeon X1650 PRO, Vista Premium

    [QUOTE="Generalkill8888"][QUOTE="Cyborg-21"]Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?[/QUOTE] I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?[/QUOTE] Just have a look at the top-most card in that chart.
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:15 pm GMT
    Generalkill8888 wrote:
    Cyborg-21 wrote:
    Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?

    I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?


    Looks like it, i just wished that the two companies could make quad-sli, quad-fire viable, as in its current condition it's quite pitiful, as i would really imagine a pc loaded with what is physically 4 gpu's to make something significant out of that. We'll just have to wait for that x2900xtx2 and 8950gx2 if they turn out to be something powerful or just another moneysink.
    [QUOTE="Generalkill8888"][QUOTE="Cyborg-21"]Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?[/QUOTE] I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?[/QUOTE] Looks like it, i just wished that the two companies could make quad-sli, quad-fire viable, as in its current condition it's quite pitiful, as i would really imagine a pc loaded with what is physically 4 gpu's to make something significant out of that. We'll just have to wait for that x2900xtx2 and 8950gx2 if they turn out to be something powerful or just another moneysink.
  • Level 23
    Super Bagman
    Posts: 1637
    Feb 25, 2007 11:15 pm GMT
    the 7950GX2 looked so ugly...
    Windows ____: Bill Gates Signature Version!

    the 7950GX2 looked so ugly...
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:18 pm GMT
    hehe imagine if the 8950gx2 turned out to be a four-slotter, lol. that would be so hilarious.
    hehe imagine if the 8950gx2 turned out to be a four-slotter, lol. that would be so hilarious.
  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 1568
    Feb 25, 2007 11:20 pm GMT
    jfelisario wrote:
    Generalkill8888 wrote:
    Cyborg-21 wrote:
    Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?

    I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?


    Looks like it, i just wished that the two companies could make quad-sli, quad-fire viable, as in its current condition it's quite pitiful, as i would really imagine a pc loaded with what is physically 4 gpu's to make something significant out of that. We'll just have to wait for that x2900xtx2 and 8950gx2 if they turn out to be something powerful or just another moneysink.


    i had trouble following that... why was teh quad thing pitiful?


    [QUOTE="jfelisario"][QUOTE="Generalkill8888"][QUOTE="Cyborg-21"]Is that X2800XTX2 similar in idea to the 7950GX2 - two GPUs on one card ?[/QUOTE] I assume, ATI is releasing a X2800XTX2?[/QUOTE] Looks like it, i just wished that the two companies could make quad-sli, quad-fire viable, as in its current condition it's quite pitiful, as i would really imagine a pc loaded with what is physically 4 gpu's to make something significant out of that. We'll just have to wait for that x2900xtx2 and 8950gx2 if they turn out to be something powerful or just another moneysink.[/QUOTE] i had trouble following that... why was teh quad thing pitiful?
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:39 pm GMT
    there are many cases where "normal" sli set-ups have surpassed the quad-sli, for example a pair of 7900 GT sli'ed can be faster than a quad, even if the gx2 are technically made out of two 7900 GT's stuck together. i guess what i'm trying to say its not practical and worth it for what it would cost people.
    there are many cases where "normal" sli set-ups have surpassed the quad-sli, for example a pair of 7900 GT sli'ed can be faster than a quad, even if the gx2 are technically made out of two 7900 GT's stuck together. i guess what i'm trying to say its not practical and worth it for what it would cost people.
  • Level 34
    Paramecium
    Posts: 5353
    Feb 25, 2007 11:39 pm GMT
    frost_mourne13 wrote:
    the 7950GX2 looked so ugly...

    I agree, it did look terrible.

    [QUOTE="frost_mourne13"]the 7950GX2 looked so ugly...[/QUOTE] I agree, it did look terrible.
  • Level 17
    Minus World
    Posts: 2703
    Feb 25, 2007 11:40 pm GMT
    jfelisario wrote:
    there are many cases where "normal" sli set-ups have surpassed the quad-sli, for example a pair of 7900 GT sli'ed can be faster than a quad, even if the gx2 are technically made out of two 7900 GT's stuck together. i guess what i'm trying to say its not practical and worth it for what it would cost people.


    Exactly. That's why Nvidia and ATI are hesitant to release quad-sli. Anyway, the driver support for current quad-sli is also poor.

    _____________________________________

    PC: Intel Pentium D 930, 2GB RAM, 200GB HDD, ATI Radeon X1650 PRO, Vista Premium

    [QUOTE="jfelisario"]there are many cases where "normal" sli set-ups have surpassed the quad-sli, for example a pair of 7900 GT sli'ed can be faster than a quad, even if the gx2 are technically made out of two 7900 GT's stuck together. i guess what i'm trying to say its not practical and worth it for what it would cost people.[/QUOTE] Exactly. That's why Nvidia and ATI are hesitant to release quad-sli. Anyway, the driver support for current quad-sli is also poor.
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:43 pm GMT
    hehehe, what ever happened to that class action lawsuit against nvidia for failing to deliver the whql drivers?
    hehehe, what ever happened to that class action lawsuit against nvidia for failing to deliver the whql drivers?
  • Level 17
    Minus World
    Posts: 2703
    Feb 25, 2007 11:45 pm GMT
    jfelisario wrote:
    hehehe, what ever happened to that class action lawsuit against nvidia for failing to deliver the whql drivers?


    Don't know. Are you talking about the Vista drivers ? Because I think Nvidia have just released WHQL Vista drivers.

    _____________________________________

    PC: Intel Pentium D 930, 2GB RAM, 200GB HDD, ATI Radeon X1650 PRO, Vista Premium

    [QUOTE="jfelisario"]hehehe, what ever happened to that class action lawsuit against nvidia for failing to deliver the whql drivers? [/QUOTE] Don't know. Are you talking about the Vista drivers ? Because I think Nvidia have just released WHQL Vista drivers.
  • Level 15
    Nobunaga's Ambition
    Posts: 2753
    Feb 25, 2007 11:46 pm GMT
    http://www.nvidiaclassaction.org/

    Check it out, good stuff
    http://www.nvidiaclassaction.org/ Check it out, good stuff :)
Forum Actions
ForumsComputer Hardware Discussion › ATI 07 complete lineup(with prices)