Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsSports Games Discussion › SF Giants wins 2nd World Series in 3 yea ...

SF Giants wins 2nd World Series in 3 years, sweeps Detroit Tigers. Sandoval MVP.

Forum Actions
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3073
    User is Online
    Feb 28, 2012 9:14 pm GMT

    Master_Live wrote:
    I don't see the Jays doing much, that would imply they beating 2 out of NYY/Sox/Rays or Tex/LAA all which look better on paper than them.

    True, but I don't think anyone will be running away with their divisions this season. That opens things up. Sure they may fizzle down the stretch, but they are young and may outlast the older teams. I think there's a 10% shot at them making it. They need better pitching. They were 6th in runs and 24th in era. They need to clean that up. The thing with teams improving is, a lot of the aces will be used on other 'contenders', so they may see more beatable hurlers.

    Has anyone run a mock season with any games? With updated rosters of course. It will be interesting to see how close they come.

    [QUOTE="Master_Live"]I don't see the Jays doing much, that would imply they beating 2 out of NYY/Sox/Rays or Tex/LAA all which look better on paper than them. [/QUOTE]

    True, but I don't think anyone will be running away with their divisions this season. That opens things up. Sure they may fizzle down the stretch, but they are young and may outlast the older teams. I think there's a 10% shot at them making it. They need better pitching. They were 6th in runs and 24th in era. They need to clean that up. The thing with teams improving is, a lot of the aces will be used on other 'contenders', so they may see more beatable hurlers.

    Has anyone run a mock season with any games? With updated rosters of course. It will be interesting to see how close they come.

  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 2785
    Feb 29, 2012 7:33 am GMT
    Master_Live wrote:

    I don't see the Jays doing much, that would imply they beating 2 out of NYY/Sox/Rays or Tex/LAA all which look better on paper.


    But we all saw last year that "on paper" doesn't always work out. You never know what happens,

    I agree what you said about the team though Namgis. Rasmus already seems to have a way better attitude, which helps. It's the pitching that has to be better outside of Romero. Much better.

    I think they can be a 90 win team which, sadly, probably won't get them in. But I think they'll hang around in Spetember. Play some meaningful baseball for once then.

    [QUOTE="Master_Live"]

    I don't see the Jays doing much, that would imply they beating 2 out of NYY/Sox/Rays or Tex/LAA all which look better on paper.

    [/QUOTE] But we all saw last year that "on paper" doesn't always work out. You never know what happens, I agree what you said about the team though Namgis. Rasmus already seems to have a way better attitude, which helps. It's the pitching that has to be better outside of Romero. Much better. I think they can be a 90 win team which, sadly, probably won't get them in. But I think they'll hang around in Spetember. Play some meaningful baseball for once then.
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3073
    User is Online
    Feb 29, 2012 3:58 pm GMT

    A.J Burnett struck in face with batted ball.

    Link

    Yikes. Hope there's no damage to his eye.

    A.J Burnett struck in face with batted ball.

    [url=http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_784108.html?_s_icmp=NetworkHeadlines]Link[/url]

    Yikes. Hope there's no damage to his eye.

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 21938
    Feb 29, 2012 4:34 pm GMT

    Namgis wrote:

    A.J Burnett struck in face with batted ball.

    Link

    Yikes. Hope there's no damage to his eye.

    "Batted" ball is a little misleading. It was a bunted ball... and he was the batter. He bunted the ball into his own face.

    Unfortunate. Painful. Hope he's all right... but it sounds like his bunting technique is worse than most Little Leaguers. It should not be possible to bunt a ball into your own face with proper form. Either his face was way out over the plate, or his lower hand was too low (leaving the bat at too sharp of an angle).

    [QUOTE="Namgis"]

    A.J Burnett struck in face with batted ball.

    [url=http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_784108.html?_s_icmp=NetworkHeadlines]Link[/url]

    Yikes. Hope there's no damage to his eye.

    [/QUOTE]

    "Batted" ball is a little misleading. It was a bunted ball... and he was the batter. He bunted the ball into his own face.

    Unfortunate. Painful. Hope he's all right... but it sounds like his bunting technique is worse than most Little Leaguers. It should not be possible to bunt a ball into your own face with proper form. Either his face was way out over the plate, or his lower hand was too low (leaving the bat at too sharp of an angle).

  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3073
    User is Online
    Feb 29, 2012 5:03 pm GMT

    Oleg_Huzwog wrote:

    "Batted" ball is a little misleading. It was a bunted ball... and he was the batter. He bunted the ball into his own face.

    Unfortunate. Painful. Hope he's all right... but it sounds like his bunting technique is worse than most Little Leaguers. It should not be possible to bunt a ball into your own face with proper form. Either his face was way out over the plate, or his lower hand was too low (leaving the bat at too sharp of an angle).

    True enough. I played with a kid who did something similar. Lost 2 teeth.

    [QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

    "Batted" ball is a little misleading. It was a bunted ball... and he was the batter. He bunted the ball into his own face.

    Unfortunate. Painful. Hope he's all right... but it sounds like his bunting technique is worse than most Little Leaguers. It should not be possible to bunt a ball into your own face with proper form. Either his face was way out over the plate, or his lower hand was too low (leaving the bat at too sharp of an angle).

    [/QUOTE]

    True enough. I played with a kid who did something similar. Lost 2 teeth.

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 36302
    Mar 1, 2012 2:08 am GMT
    Ring_of_fire wrote:
    The ALE and NLE are the best divisions in baseball.

    Suuurreee, i wonder how much the media has to do with these opinions.
    Give me the Spankees, Tiggers, Rangers, Angels
    Braves, Cardinals, Dbacks, Phils
    Ring_of_fire wrote:
    it will also be interesting to see how Miami's new ballpark plays.

    Hopefully like a real ballpark, BOOOOO the Mets! Bringing in the fences like everyone said they would, fact is it's about the same dimensions as Shea, weak hitters just love to cry and blame the stadium for their suckitude. A HR should be a real mans HR.

    http://joeposnanski.blogspot.com/2012/02/first-argument-of-spring.html Joe Po talks about stadiums and player perceptions because of them.......reminds me of Michael Young, possibly the most overrated player in baseball?

    Be careful people, expanded postseason means your sucky GM might keep his job longer than they should. "Bu bu bu i made teh playofffzz" I like how Bobby V took a shot at Jeter and his "flip play" lol
    Edited on Mar 1, 2012 2:10 am GMT


    TNM | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5
    [QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"]The ALE and NLE are the best divisions in baseball.[/QUOTE] Suuurreee, i wonder how much the media has to do with these opinions. Give me the Spankees, Tiggers, Rangers, Angels Braves, Cardinals, Dbacks, Phils [QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"]it will also be interesting to see how Miami's new ballpark plays. [/QUOTE] Hopefully like a real ballpark, BOOOOO the Mets! Bringing in the fences like everyone said they would, fact is it's about the same dimensions as Shea, weak hitters just love to cry and blame the stadium for their suckitude. A HR should be a real mans HR. [url]http://joeposnanski.blogspot.com/2012/02/first-argument-of-spring.html[/url] Joe Po talks about stadiums and player perceptions because of them.......reminds me of Michael Young, possibly the most overrated player in baseball? Be careful people, expanded postseason means your sucky GM might keep his job longer than they should. "Bu bu bu i made teh playofffzz" I like how Bobby V took a shot at Jeter and his "flip play" lol
  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 2785
    Mar 1, 2012 6:27 am GMT

    Sounds like the MLB are very close to adding the extra wild card for this season. It'll be a 1 game sudden death.

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7630682/mlb-union-close-finalizing-expanded-playoffs

    Sounds like the MLB are very close to adding the extra wild card for this season. It'll be a 1 game sudden death.

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7630682/mlb-union-close-finalizing-expanded-playoffs

  • Level 71
    Castle Crasher
    Posts: 31344
    Mar 1, 2012 6:52 am GMT
    Ugh.

    ---
    LastFM

    cjlol

    Ugh.
  • Level 40
    Abobo
    Posts: 3504
    Mar 1, 2012 7:10 am GMT

    JohnBean42 wrote:

    Sounds like the MLB are very close to adding the extra wild card for this season. It'll be a 1 game sudden death.

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7630682/mlb-union-close-finalizing-expanded-playoffs

    Not a fan, but at least they're doing the one game sudden death thing.

    [QUOTE="JohnBean42"]

    Sounds like the MLB are very close to adding the extra wild card for this season. It'll be a 1 game sudden death.

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7630682/mlb-union-close-finalizing-expanded-playoffs

    [/QUOTE]Not a fan, but at least they're doing the one game sudden death thing.

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 21938
    Mar 1, 2012 8:23 am GMT

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 2785
    Mar 1, 2012 12:54 pm GMT
    Oleg_Huzwog wrote:

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.


    That's what I like about this whole thing.

    [QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    [/QUOTE] That's what I like about this whole thing.
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3073
    User is Online
    Mar 1, 2012 1:30 pm GMT

    JohnBean42 wrote:
    Oleg_Huzwog wrote:

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    That's what I like about this whole thing.

    Also, it's a one game playoff. Short and sweet. The what really bothers me is, the winning team will have to go into a 5 game series with their ace possibly only being able to throw once because they were used in this game. I think it should be a provisional game. What if the 2 teams vying for a WC spot are separated by 5 games? How is it fair to the team that has performed better throughout the year?

    [QUOTE="JohnBean42"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    [/QUOTE] That's what I like about this whole thing. [/QUOTE]

    Also, it's a one game playoff. Short and sweet. The what really bothers me is, the winning team will have to go into a 5 game series with their ace possibly only being able to throw once because they were used in this game. I think it should be a provisional game. What if the 2 teams vying for a WC spot are separated by 5 games? How is it fair to the team that has performed better throughout the year?

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 21938
    Mar 1, 2012 1:35 pm GMT

    Namgis wrote:

    JohnBean42 wrote:
    Oleg_Huzwog wrote:

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    That's what I like about this whole thing.

    Also, it's a one game playoff. Short and sweet. The what really bothers me is, the winning team will have to go into a 5 game series with their ace possibly only being able to throw once because they were used in this game. I think it should be a provisional game. What if the 2 teams vying for a WC spot are separated by 5 games? How is it fair to the team that has performed better throughout the year?

    Then you say "tough beans, win your division next time".

    [QUOTE="Namgis"]

    [QUOTE="JohnBean42"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    [/QUOTE] That's what I like about this whole thing. [/QUOTE]

    Also, it's a one game playoff. Short and sweet. The what really bothers me is, the winning team will have to go into a 5 game series with their ace possibly only being able to throw once because they were used in this game. I think it should be a provisional game. What if the 2 teams vying for a WC spot are separated by 5 games? How is it fair to the team that has performed better throughout the year?

    [/QUOTE]

    Then you say "tough beans, win your division next time".

  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3073
    User is Online
    Mar 1, 2012 1:47 pm GMT

    Oleg_Huzwog wrote:

    Then you say "tough beans, win your division next time".

    True. But why change things then? It was that way before. Look at the great finish last year. I think they over reacted to that finish and thought they could recreate it.

    [QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

    Then you say "tough beans, win your division next time".

    [/QUOTE]

    True. But why change things then? It was that way before. Look at the great finish last year. I think they over reacted to that finish and thought they could recreate it.

  • Level 71
    Castle Crasher
    Posts: 31344
    Mar 1, 2012 3:48 pm GMT
    If I had my way they'd go back to two divisions per league and just start the playoffs with the ALCS/NLCS.

    I realize that will never ever happen though.

    ---
    LastFM

    cjlol

    If I had my way they'd go back to two divisions per league and just start the playoffs with the ALCS/NLCS. I realize that will never ever happen though.
  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 9085
    Mar 2, 2012 3:02 am GMT
    Oleg_Huzwog wrote:

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.



    This.
    JML897 wrote:
    If I had my way they'd go back to two divisions per league and just start the playoffs with the ALCS/NLCS.

    I realize that will never ever happen though.


    I guess you read this article: We should go to two divisions

    And on the seventh day, God rested. Having created the heavens and the Earth, the seas and all they contain, He ceased all labors. But the seventh day being a Sunday, and with all of His fantasy teams playing, He needed a shortstop. So God created Derek Jeter, and blessed him, and said unto him, be fruitful. And Jeter was good. Jeter held dominion over opposing pitchers (.343 AVG in 2006), was plentiful in power (14 HR and 97 RBIs), and moved over the earth (34 steals) and across home plate (118 runs). And God blessed Jeter, and sanctified him, and said to Roto owners everywhere, make Jeter your No. 1 middle infielder.

    [QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

    I don't like the idea of diluting the playoffs, but I do like the idea of giving greater importance to winning your division.

    [/QUOTE] This. [QUOTE="JML897"]If I had my way they'd go back to two divisions per league and just start the playoffs with the ALCS/NLCS. I realize that will never ever happen though. [/QUOTE] I guess you read this article: [url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/joe_sheehan/02/29/wild.card/index.html?sct=mlb_t11_a1]We should go to two divisions[/url]
  • Level 71
    Castle Crasher
    Posts: 31344
    Mar 2, 2012 6:03 am GMT
    ^I actually didn't.

    ---
    LastFM

    cjlol

    ^I actually didn't. :P
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3073
    User is Online
    Mar 4, 2012 12:43 pm GMT

    Just enjoying my first ST game of the year. Yanks vs. Phillies. Gonna be a fun year. I wonder when the Yanks are going to allow retired numbers to be worn again? In a few years we are going to be seeing a lot of 60's and 80's in the line up.

    Just enjoying my first ST game of the year. Yanks vs. Phillies. Gonna be a fun year. I wonder when the Yanks are going to allow retired numbers to be worn again? In a few years we are going to be seeing a lot of 60's and 80's in the line up.

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 9085
    Mar 4, 2012 1:40 pm GMT
    Namgis wrote:

    I wonder when the Yanks are going to allow retired numbers to be worn again?



    Never.

    And on the seventh day, God rested. Having created the heavens and the Earth, the seas and all they contain, He ceased all labors. But the seventh day being a Sunday, and with all of His fantasy teams playing, He needed a shortstop. So God created Derek Jeter, and blessed him, and said unto him, be fruitful. And Jeter was good. Jeter held dominion over opposing pitchers (.343 AVG in 2006), was plentiful in power (14 HR and 97 RBIs), and moved over the earth (34 steals) and across home plate (118 runs). And God blessed Jeter, and sanctified him, and said to Roto owners everywhere, make Jeter your No. 1 middle infielder.

    [QUOTE="Namgis"]

    I wonder when the Yanks are going to allow retired numbers to be worn again?

    [/QUOTE] Never.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 21938
    Mar 7, 2012 12:40 pm GMT

    Andrew McCutchen signed a 6 yr / $51 million extension. Pirates got a pretty big home-discount there.

    Andrew McCutchen signed a 6 yr / $51 million extension. Pirates got a pretty big home-discount there.

Forum Actions
ForumsSports Games Discussion › SF Giants wins 2nd World Series in 3 yea ...