Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Obama says students with disabilities ha ...

The Classic Off-Topic forum is a place where games or platforms discussions are taboo. Here, you can talk about just about anything outside of games, just make sure to stay classy and follow the rules.

Forum Rules:
- Follow the Terms of Use and read the FAQ.
- Keep your discussions friendly and respectful of others.
- Keep the discussions work friendly. More details in the FAQ (For something more laid back go to Off Topic: After Hours
- Game and platform discussions NOT allowed (For that go to the Primary Games Board or System Wars.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions.
- Hate speech not permitted.

Obama says students with disabilities have a right to play sports

Forum Actions
  • Level 9
    Ikari Warrior
    Posts: 783
    Jan 25, 2013 4:56 pm GMT
    DroidPhysX wrote:
    You know in elementary or middle school where you act like you hate a girl to overcompensate the fact that you REALLY like her?

    The girl is Obama and the guy "hating" her is Laihendi.


    Bulbasaur sucks
    [QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]You know in elementary or middle school where you act like you hate a girl to overcompensate the fact that you REALLY like her? The girl is Obama and the guy "hating" her is Laihendi.[/QUOTE] Bulbasaur sucks
  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 5398
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 4:59 pm GMT
    doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property
    doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property
  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 29300
    Jan 25, 2013 5:00 pm GMT
    VanHelsingBoA64 wrote:
    doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property

    Some of them
    [QUOTE="VanHelsingBoA64"]doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property[/QUOTE] Some of them
  • Level 65
    You're Winner !
    Posts: 29847
    Site moderatorBoard Moderator
    Jan 25, 2013 5:03 pm GMT
    VanHelsingBoA64 wrote:
    doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property



    Django Unchained: OT Edition.

    [QUOTE="VanHelsingBoA64"]doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property[/QUOTE] Django Unchained: OT Edition.
  • Level 52
    Spoony Bard
    Posts: 13379
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:04 pm GMT
    I like that they are accomodating disabled people more and more and this is brilliant that they are creating more opportunities for team work and sports for them. I mean sports is fun as hell not just a professional business.

    At university there were two disabled guys in my first year, they had helpers to make sure note were taken and classes were attended, what I didn't know was that they had been through the same year of university FIVE TIMES in a row and never managed to pass and I think there's a time to draw the line and just get them the hell out, that was essentially eight places on that course taken up by two guys who shouldn't have been there., the first year fine, gotta evaluate them to start with so instead of ten its eight places.

    Moral of the story: Don't try to treat them as equals just because you don't want to upset anyone.

    My rig: Intel i5 2500k | 8GB 2000Mhz RAM | 2x 120GB SSD in RAID 0 | AMD HD 6970 2GB | Asus P8Z68-V LX

    I like that they are accomodating disabled people more and more and this is brilliant that they are creating more opportunities for team work and sports for them. I mean sports is fun as hell not just a professional business. At university there were two disabled guys in my first year, they had helpers to make sure note were taken and classes were attended, what I didn't know was that they had been through the same year of university FIVE TIMES in a row and never managed to pass and I think there's a time to draw the line and just get them the hell out, that was essentially eight places on that course taken up by two guys who shouldn't have been there., the first year fine, gotta evaluate them to start with so instead of ten its eight places. Moral of the story: Don't try to treat them as equals just because you don't want to upset anyone.
  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 29300
    Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm GMT
    Allicrombie wrote:
    VanHelsingBoA64 wrote:
    doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property



    Django Unchained: OT Edition.


    Whis is the django of OT?
    [QUOTE="Allicrombie"][QUOTE="VanHelsingBoA64"]doesn't laihendi consider disabled people property[/QUOTE] Django Unchained: OT Edition.[/QUOTE] Whis is the django of OT?
  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 4780
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:05 pm GMT

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.

    Edited on Jan 25, 2013 5:12 pm GMT Edited 3 total times.

    ~~~~~~~

    Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.

    ~~~~~~~

    Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.

    ~~~~~~~

    Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 13847
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:17 pm GMT
    Laihendi wrote:

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.


    Wat do you think about Title IX then?

    Now Playing: Biochock Infinite, P4: Golden, Pinball Arcade

    [QUOTE="Laihendi"]

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.

    [/QUOTE] Wat do you think about Title IX then?
  • Level 34
    Paramecium
    Posts: 8128
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:28 pm GMT
    See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children
    See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children
  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 4780
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:36 pm GMT
    jimkabrhel wrote:
    Laihendi wrote:

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.


    Wat do you think about Title IX then?

    Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.

    ~~~~~~~

    Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.

    ~~~~~~~

    Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.

    ~~~~~~~

    Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.

    [QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.

    [/QUOTE] Wat do you think about Title IX then?[/QUOTE] Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.
  • Level 22
    Blaster Master
    Posts: 2195
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:39 pm GMT
    BossPerson wrote:
    See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children

    lai, that is called deductive logic. you should try it sometimes.
    -------------------
    Just a ride.
    [QUOTE="BossPerson"]See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children[/QUOTE] lai, that is called deductive logic. you should try it sometimes.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 13847
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:39 pm GMT
    Laihendi wrote:
    jimkabrhel wrote:
    Laihendi wrote:

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.


    Wat do you think about Title IX then?

    Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.

    I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards.
    I can see that going over well.

    Now Playing: Biochock Infinite, P4: Golden, Pinball Arcade

    [QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]

    The article in the op specifically mentions how one of Obama's special advisers was partially blind during high school so the school made it so that everyone wrestling had to touch each other at all times so that he would not be disadvantaged. If this man gets what he wants then there will just be more changes like that that effect everyone. Sports will be remade in attempt to remove any competitive advantages or disadvantages that anyone in a given group might have.

    The reality is that there are simply not enough physically handicapped people who are interested in athletics to create teams for traditional sports for the disabled in most places. That means that if they are going to participate in traditional sports they must be on the same team as the nondisabled. We should end public education and all of these kinds of programs and let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. The government shouldn't be controlling how children engage in sports.

    [/QUOTE] Wat do you think about Title IX then?[/QUOTE] Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.[/QUOTE] I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards. I can see that going over well.
  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 6788
    Jan 25, 2013 5:44 pm GMT
    I don't know if playing sports should be considered a right to anyone.
    I don't know if playing sports should be considered a right to anyone.
  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 4780
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:45 pm GMT
    jimkabrhel wrote:
    Laihendi wrote:
    jimkabrhel wrote:

    Wat do you think about Title IX then?

    Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.

    I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards.
    I can see that going over well.

    No, that means that institutions would establish their own rules and standards, and people would have a variety of different institutions to choose from and support with their money, rather than having it stolen by the government and used to fund institutions they may be opposed to.

    ~~~~~~~

    Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.

    ~~~~~~~

    Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.

    ~~~~~~~

    Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.

    [QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"] Wat do you think about Title IX then?[/QUOTE] Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.[/QUOTE] I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards. I can see that going over well.[/QUOTE] No, that means that institutions would establish their own rules and standards, and people would have a variety of different institutions to choose from and support with their money, rather than having it stolen by the government and used to fund institutions they may be opposed to.
  • Level 52
    Spoony Bard
    Posts: 7298
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:46 pm GMT

    Okay then. As long as there's no quotas, it's fine. Title IX was alright but the quotas ruined it for some sports that were male-dominated with no or barely any female interest.


    "If you're going through hell, keep going." ~ Winston Churchill

    Okay then. As long as there's no quotas, it's fine. Title IX was alright but the quotas ruined it for some sports that were male-dominated with no or barely any female interest.

  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 4780
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:47 pm GMT
    Rich3232 wrote:
    BossPerson wrote:
    See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children

    lai, that is called deductive logic. you should try it sometimes.

    1. Ayn Rand didn't hate disabled children.
    2. Me respecting Ayn Rand does not mean that I blindly conform to any prejudice she had, even if she really did have it (in this case she didn't).

    ~~~~~~~

    Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.

    ~~~~~~~

    Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.

    ~~~~~~~

    Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.

    [QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children[/QUOTE] lai, that is called deductive logic. you should try it sometimes. [/QUOTE] 1. Ayn Rand didn't hate disabled children. 2. Me respecting Ayn Rand does not mean that I blindly conform to any prejudice she had, even if she really did have it (in this case she didn't).
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 13847
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:47 pm GMT
    Laihendi wrote:
    jimkabrhel wrote:
    Laihendi wrote:

    Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.

    I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards.
    I can see that going over well.

    No, that means that institutions would establish their own rules and standards, and people would have a variety of different institutions to choose from and support with their money, rather than having it stolen by the government and used to fund institutions they may be opposed to.

    Exactly as I said. Each institution would establish their own standard, which means any degrees offered could not be compared to each other. Different standard at each school would also mean athletic teams might not compete against each other in a fair way.

    Now Playing: Biochock Infinite, P4: Golden, Pinball Arcade

    [QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Education and recreation should not receive federal funding anyways so the fact that Title IX is even relevant is a problem.[/QUOTE] I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards. I can see that going over well.[/QUOTE] No, that means that institutions would establish their own rules and standards, and people would have a variety of different institutions to choose from and support with their money, rather than having it stolen by the government and used to fund institutions they may be opposed to.[/QUOTE] Exactly as I said. Each institution would establish their own standard, which means any degrees offered could not be compared to each other. Different standard at each school would also mean athletic teams might not compete against each other in a fair way.
  • Level 52
    Spoony Bard
    Posts: 7298
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:47 pm GMT

    BossPerson wrote:
    See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children

    Ayn Rand hates disabled children?

    Okay then...


    "If you're going through hell, keep going." ~ Winston Churchill

    [QUOTE="BossPerson"]See its because Ayn Rand hates disabled children, Laihendi loves Ayn Rand, thus Laihendi hates disabled children[/QUOTE]

    Ayn Rand hates disabled children?

    Okay then... :?

  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20785
    Jan 25, 2013 5:50 pm GMT

    Laihendi wrote:
    let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want.

    You do realize that people can already do that right?

    Laihendi wrote:
    Atlas Shrugged is an objective representation of the real world in the form of a novel.

    [QUOTE="Laihendi"]let people organize on their own and form their own sports teams and make them however they want. [/QUOTE]

    You do realize that people can already do that right?

  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 4780
    User is Online
    Jan 25, 2013 5:52 pm GMT
    jimkabrhel wrote:
    Laihendi wrote:
    jimkabrhel wrote:

    I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards.
    I can see that going over well.

    No, that means that institutions would establish their own rules and standards, and people would have a variety of different institutions to choose from and support with their money, rather than having it stolen by the government and used to fund institutions they may be opposed to.

    Exactly as I said. Each institution would establish their own standard, which means any degrees offered could not be compared to each other. Different standard at each school would also mean athletic teams might not compete against each other in a fair way.

    If what you are saying was true then degrees from private universities and schools would be worthless, when in reality the most respected and valued degrees tend to come from private universities.

    ~~~~~~~

    Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.

    ~~~~~~~

    Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.

    ~~~~~~~

    Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.

    [QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"] I see. You don't believe in public education. That means that there would be no rules on any institution for educational standards or athletic standards. I can see that going over well.[/QUOTE] No, that means that institutions would establish their own rules and standards, and people would have a variety of different institutions to choose from and support with their money, rather than having it stolen by the government and used to fund institutions they may be opposed to.[/QUOTE] Exactly as I said. Each institution would establish their own standard, which means any degrees offered could not be compared to each other. Different standard at each school would also mean athletic teams might not compete against each other in a fair way.[/QUOTE] If what you are saying was true then degrees from private universities and schools would be worthless, when in reality the most respected and valued degrees tend to come from private universities.
Forum Actions
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Obama says students with disabilities ha ...