Search
Search
Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
Forums › Medal of Honor: Warfighter Forum › $60 for 3 hr Single player again?

$60 for 3 hr Single player again?

Forum Actions
New Message
  • fanirama
     
    User is Online
    Jun 11, 2012 1:23 pm GMT

    I got burned last time. It was good but extremely short. I finished MoH in about 4.5 hours. Not even 5 hours and I paid $60 for it. Never again.

    Will this game be the same ?

     

    For me, SP > 12-14 hr means I pay $50 for it (or $60 for those ridiculous companies charging this)

     

    SP 9-12hrs = $40 max.

     

    SP 6-9 hrs = $30 max.

     

    SP < 6hrs = $20 max.-or-  rent from friend/gamefly/Blockbuster etc.

     

    I don't play MP so this is my standard now. Gotten burnt by this game before and I don't want to anymore.

    I got burned last time. It was good but extremely short. I finished MoH in about 4.5 hours. Not even 5 hours and I paid $60 for it. Never again.

    Will this game be the same ?

     

    For me, SP > 12-14 hr means I pay $50 for it (or $60 for those ridiculous companies charging this)

     

    SP 9-12hrs = $40 max.

     

    SP 6-9 hrs = $30 max.

     

    SP < 6hrs = $20 max.-or-  rent from friend/gamefly/Blockbuster etc.

     

    I don't play MP so this is my standard now. Gotten burnt by this game before and I don't want to anymore.

    Report Abuse
  • D1S
     
    Jun 12, 2012 7:16 am GMT
    Probably. The "ripped from the headlines" approach that they appear to be taking says to me "we can't be bothered to come up with our own narrative, so we're just going to use headlines that people are familiar with in order to disguise "lack of creativity" as "giving the game a real world feel."
    Probably. The "ripped from the headlines" approach that they appear to be taking says to me "we can't be bothered to come up with our own narrative, so we're just going to use headlines that people are familiar with in order to disguise "lack of creativity" as "giving the game a real world feel."
    Report Abuse
  • Marine122
     
    Jun 17, 2012 9:55 am GMT

    Oh im sorry you said 3 hours when it was actually 5 hours? I can finish any Call of Duty Game after 4 in about 2.5 hours. Not to mention the terrible story.

     

    I mean afterall medal of Honor did have some credibility on its story after all it was based off a real mission by real special forces and elite infantry.

    Oh im sorry you said 3 hours when it was actually 5 hours? I can finish any Call of Duty Game after 4 in about 2.5 hours. Not to mention the terrible story.

     

    I mean afterall medal of Honor did have some credibility on its story after all it was based off a real mission by real special forces and elite infantry.

    Report Abuse
  • DragonXV7
     
    Jun 18, 2012 7:26 pm GMT
    D1S wrote:
    Probably. The "ripped from the headlines" approach that they appear to be taking says to me "we can't be bothered to come up with our own narrative, so we're just going to use headlines that people are familiar with in order to disguise "lack of creativity" as "giving the game a real world feel."


    The game storyline was written by two real Special Forces soldier, so unless you can get your fact straight go shove it up your ass.
    [QUOTE="D1S"]Probably. The "ripped from the headlines" approach that they appear to be taking says to me "we can't be bothered to come up with our own narrative, so we're just going to use headlines that people are familiar with in order to disguise "lack of creativity" as "giving the game a real world feel."[/QUOTE] The game storyline was written by two real Special Forces soldier, so unless you can get your fact straight go shove it up your ass.
    Report Abuse
  • StarkJJ
     
    Oct 5, 2012 9:09 am GMT

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    www.youtube.com/starkjj

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    Report Abuse
  • gruoch1
     
    User is Online
    Oct 5, 2012 9:02 pm GMT

    StarkJJ wrote:

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    The reason is because many people prefer playing the single player and don't really care for the multiplayer. Different people like different things. This is why many games have multiple difficulty settings for example. You need not pity the people who like different things then you.

    Yes, I am THE Lord JoshForce...

    [QUOTE="StarkJJ"]

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    [/QUOTE]

    The reason is because many people prefer playing the single player and don't really care for the multiplayer. Different people like different things. This is why many games have multiple difficulty settings for example. You need not pity the people who like different things then you.

    Report Abuse
  • mrsniper83
     
    Oct 6, 2012 5:06 pm GMT

    Marine122 wrote:

    Oh im sorry you said 3 hours when it was actually 5 hours? I can finish any Call of Duty Game after 4 in about 2.5 hours. Not to mention the terrible story.

    I mean afterall medal of Honor did have some credibility on its story after all it was based off a real mission by real special forces and elite infantry.

    You can't beat any Call of duty game in 2.5 hours...your just trying to sound like a badass

    Edited on Oct 6, 2012 5:07 pm GMT

    Raptr Gamercard

    [QUOTE="Marine122"]

    Oh im sorry you said 3 hours when it was actually 5 hours? I can finish any Call of Duty Game after 4 in about 2.5 hours. Not to mention the terrible story.

    I mean afterall medal of Honor did have some credibility on its story after all it was based off a real mission by real special forces and elite infantry.

    [/QUOTE]You can't beat any Call of duty game in 2.5 hours...your just trying to sound like a badass

    Report Abuse
  • l4dgamerfan
     
    Oct 6, 2012 6:26 pm GMT

    gruoch1 wrote:

    StarkJJ wrote:

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    The reason is because many people prefer playing the single player and don't really care for the multiplayer. Different people like different things. This is why many games have multiple difficulty settings for example. You need not pity the people who like different things then you.

    Few, not many. Few prefer. Or at least a minority. Don't think you're in the majority.

    My forklift just had a heart attack.-totalbiscuit gt: gamaster320

    It's not spite it's just an unjust hatred for you and everything you enjoy in life, Kicid Sior

    [QUOTE="gruoch1"]

    [QUOTE="StarkJJ"]

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    [/QUOTE]

    The reason is because many people prefer playing the single player and don't really care for the multiplayer. Different people like different things. This is why many games have multiple difficulty settings for example. You need not pity the people who like different things then you.

    [/QUOTE]Few, not many. Few prefer. Or at least a minority. Don't think you're in the majority.

    Report Abuse
  • Powerwalk
     
    Oct 9, 2012 7:42 am GMT

    Yeah i am also one of those people that dont care about multiplayer. Medal of honor frontline did just fine without the MP. If you have noticed FPS games that have a long campaign dont even have Multiplayer and I much prefer a 30 hour campaign over a couple of MP maps.


    Get your Portable ID!s3

    psn : brutalguy

    Yeah i am also one of those people that dont care about multiplayer. Medal of honor frontline did just fine without the MP. If you have noticed FPS games that have a long campaign dont even have Multiplayer and I much prefer a 30 hour campaign over a couple of MP maps.

    Report Abuse
  • MaddenBowler10
     
    User is Online
    Oct 10, 2012 1:01 am GMT
    I don't see why developers even bother with making a single player for military shooters anymore...the story is almost always forgettable and short and no one buys the games for the singleplayer.

    Track me on GS|Addme on Facebook|Followme on Twitter

    I don't see why developers even bother with making a single player for military shooters anymore...the story is almost always forgettable and short and no one buys the games for the singleplayer.
    Report Abuse
  • blastmaster2k2
     
    Oct 10, 2012 10:43 am GMT
    MaddenBowler10 wrote:
    I don't see why developers even bother with making a single player for military shooters anymore...the story is almost always forgettable and short and no one buys the games for the singleplayer.


    If that were true they wouldn't be crying on Gamespot that they want a lot more people to play the multiplayer portion of their games. They seriously have an article on here dedicated to crying about not enough people play the mp portion of their games. lmao So, you couldn't possibly be more wrong, directly from the developers mouth.
    [QUOTE="MaddenBowler10"]I don't see why developers even bother with making a single player for military shooters anymore...the story is almost always forgettable and short and no one buys the games for the singleplayer. [/QUOTE] If that were true they wouldn't be crying on Gamespot that they want a lot more people to play the multiplayer portion of their games. They seriously have an article on here dedicated to crying about not enough people play the mp portion of their games. lmao So, you couldn't possibly be more wrong, directly from the developers mouth.
    Report Abuse
  • Powerwalk
     
    Oct 11, 2012 6:58 am GMT

    blastmaster2k2 wrote:
    MaddenBowler10 wrote:
    I don't see why developers even bother with making a single player for military shooters anymore...the story is almost always forgettable and short and no one buys the games for the singleplayer.
    If that were true they wouldn't be crying on Gamespot that they want a lot more people to play the multiplayer portion of their games. They seriously have an article on here dedicated to crying about not enough people play the mp portion of their games. lmao So, you couldn't possibly be more wrong, directly from the developers mouth.

    Haha yeah i read that article from treyarch i couldent really believe what they were saying because so much people play cod online. I even see 8 year olds playing cod online now

    Edited on Oct 11, 2012 6:59 am GMT


    Get your Portable ID!s3

    psn : brutalguy

    [QUOTE="blastmaster2k2"][QUOTE="MaddenBowler10"]I don't see why developers even bother with making a single player for military shooters anymore...the story is almost always forgettable and short and no one buys the games for the singleplayer. [/QUOTE] If that were true they wouldn't be crying on Gamespot that they want a lot more people to play the multiplayer portion of their games. They seriously have an article on here dedicated to crying about not enough people play the mp portion of their games. lmao So, you couldn't possibly be more wrong, directly from the developers mouth. [/QUOTE]

    Haha yeah i read that article from treyarch i couldent really believe what they were saying because so much people play cod online. I even see 8 year olds playing cod online now

    Report Abuse
  • gruoch1
     
    User is Online
    Oct 15, 2012 4:56 pm GMT

    l4dgamerfan wrote:

    gruoch1 wrote:

    StarkJJ wrote:

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    The reason is because many people prefer playing the single player and don't really care for the multiplayer. Different people like different things. This is why many games have multiple difficulty settings for example. You need not pity the people who like different things then you.

    Few, not many. Few prefer. Or at least a minority. Don't think you're in the majority.

    More people than you think.

    Yes, I am THE Lord JoshForce...

    [QUOTE="l4dgamerfan"]

    [QUOTE="gruoch1"]

    [QUOTE="StarkJJ"]

    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    [/QUOTE]

    The reason is because many people prefer playing the single player and don't really care for the multiplayer. Different people like different things. This is why many games have multiple difficulty settings for example. You need not pity the people who like different things then you.

    [/QUOTE]Few, not many. Few prefer. Or at least a minority. Don't think you're in the majority.

    [/QUOTE]

    More people than you think.

    Report Abuse
  • StarkJJ
     
    Oct 16, 2012 10:51 pm GMT

    Well, after playing the beta I can officially call this game utter trash.  Yet another typical EA rush job. Actually, just another crap game from EA.  Rushed or not...EA makes crap games.  Period.

    www.youtube.com/starkjj

    Well, after playing the beta I can officially call this game utter trash.  Yet another typical EA rush job. Actually, just another crap game from EA.  Rushed or not...EA makes crap games.  Period.

    Report Abuse
  • olderlady
     
    Oct 23, 2012 12:43 am GMT
    That is in 'your opinion' . You cannot speak for the fans of EA who have made very good games for years, otherwise they would not still be in business!

    I will buy this game and enjoy the single player mode as I do not want to play multiplayer and have to listen to the garbage spilled out of the mouths of foul mouthed kids that cannot control their aggression and just play it for what it is...A Game..not the B all and End all of entertainment.

    I will also buy Black OPs 2, to play in single player, it is my money, my choice.

    I have good games that I find have good replay value after sitting on my bookcase for 6 months or more, rarely sell the top FPS games.
    But this is only 'My Opinion'.
    That is in 'your opinion' . You cannot speak for the fans of EA who have made very good games for years, otherwise they would not still be in business! I will buy this game and enjoy the single player mode as I do not want to play multiplayer and have to listen to the garbage spilled out of the mouths of foul mouthed kids that cannot control their aggression and just play it for what it is...A Game..not the B all and End all of entertainment. I will also buy Black OPs 2, to play in single player, it is my money, my choice. I have good games that I find have good replay value after sitting on my bookcase for 6 months or more, rarely sell the top FPS games. But this is only 'My Opinion'.
    Report Abuse
  • sbdb
     
    Oct 23, 2012 3:38 am GMT

    StarkJJ wrote:
    Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.

    The single player in this game sucks, because it's way too short, has no replay value and uses old concepts. The multi-player sucks even more, because it's mostly a matter of getting new maps, some changes to weapons and gameplay and doing the same boring thing all over again, which is running around like a idiot in an arcade setting playing against little kids who have nothing better to do than to play this game 4-8 hours day in and day out. There is hardly any strategy and tactics involved, just a matter of quick reactions and knowing your maps. It's a boring and absolutely no challenging experience. It's a quick money making game concept that for some odd reason seems to sell really well among kids like you, so we'll see Medal of Honor/COD/BF 10,11,12,13,14,15, 16,... ~yawn~

    [QUOTE="StarkJJ"]Like Call of Duty, this game is judged by its multiplayer.  If all you play is single then I pity you.  Heck, why even bother with the single player aspect in games like this.  Just give me a disk full of multiplayer content.  Maybe a short traininig mission so I can get use to the controls.[/QUOTE]

    The single player in this game sucks, because it's way too short, has no replay value and uses old concepts. The multi-player sucks even more, because it's mostly a matter of getting new maps, some changes to weapons and gameplay and doing the same boring thing all over again, which is running around like a idiot in an arcade setting playing against little kids who have nothing better to do than to play this game 4-8 hours day in and day out. There is hardly any strategy and tactics involved, just a matter of quick reactions and knowing your maps. It's a boring and absolutely no challenging experience. It's a quick money making game concept that for some odd reason seems to sell really well among kids like you, so we'll see Medal of Honor/COD/BF 10,11,12,13,14,15, 16,... ~yawn~

    Report Abuse
  • nnjavanish
     
    Oct 24, 2012 12:47 pm GMT
    It seems to me that if you're getting 6 hours or less from a single-player story mode such as this game or Battlefield 3, then the developers are pandering to the people who play multi-player. That, or what they're saying is that for the level of realism of story and graphics, that you should be happy paying $60 for less than a day's worth of linear gameplay!
    It seems to me that if you're getting 6 hours or less from a single-player story mode such as this game or Battlefield 3, then the developers are pandering to the people who play multi-player. That, or what they're saying is that for the level of realism of story and graphics, that you should be happy paying $60 for less than a day's worth of linear gameplay!
    Report Abuse
  • Simplythebest12
     
    User is Online
    Oct 24, 2012 1:54 pm GMT

    THE GAME IN SINGLE PLAYER IS COMPLETELY CRAP. IT IS SHORT AND BORING !!

    IF YOU CARE ABOUT SINGLE PLAYER DO NOT BUY IT

    Edited on Oct 24, 2012 1:57 pm GMT

    THE GAME IN SINGLE PLAYER IS COMPLETELY CRAP. IT IS SHORT AND BORING !!

    IF YOU CARE ABOUT SINGLE PLAYER DO NOT BUY IT

    Report Abuse
Forum Actions
New Message
Forums › Medal of Honor: Warfighter Forum › $60 for 3 hr Single player again?

Medal of Honor: Warfighter Boxshot
Follow:
  1. Not Following
    Xbox 360: Follow
  2. Not Following
    PC: Follow
  3. Not Following
    PlayStation 3: Follow
Add to List
  1. Xbox 360
  2. PC
  3. PlayStation 3
    Platforms:
    MoH: Warfighter Navigation

    Games You May Like

    Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

    See More Similar Games