Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsNBA 2K13 ForumNBA 2K13 Xbox 360 ForumHow well do you think this team would do ...

How well do you think this team would do IRL?

Forum Actions
Thread locked

This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.

  • Jan 20, 2013 5:11 pm GMT
    Every time I do a fantasy draft in association, I try to make a realistic and cap friendly team. I drafted near the bottom of round 1 in a serpentine draft

    My team: Knicks, Head Coach: Mike Woodson

    PG: Jeremy Lin
    SG: Kirk Hinrich
    SF: Paul George
    PF: Josh Smith
    C: Tyson Chandler

    Bench
    Jason Richardson, Sebastian Telfair, Rasheed Wallace..

    My team is rated pretty high at 85 and We have 5 million in cap space. If I trade Jrich for an expiring, I will have about 30 million in cap space next season. I am hoping I can resign Josh Smith and sign Chris Paul. Probably a long shot but hey.

    What do you think?
    ---
    PSN: illfamous
    New York Knicks: Your favorite team's favorite team
  • Jan 20, 2013 7:35 pm GMT
    First round out, second at best. Great defensive team though
    ---
    "It's the stronger that make the weaker"- Milliardo Peacecraft
  • Jan 21, 2013 2:51 am GMT
    I don't like you because you got rid of Melo and STAT. I don't see a noticeable difference between Amar'e and Smith in this game.
    ---
    I finally get to change my sig! The New York Knicks are no longer laughing stocks! 2012-13 Atlantic Division Champs! 11/20/12
  • Jan 21, 2013 3:26 am GMT
    He didnt get rid of em, its a fantasy draft. He just happened to pick a couple of knicks players
  • Jan 21, 2013 4:14 pm GMT
    I would rather have smith over stat,irl, any day of the week
    ---
    PSN: illfamous
    New York Knicks: Your favorite team's favorite team
  • Jan 21, 2013 4:25 pm GMT
    PG-SF isn't putting much fear into the opponent. Henrich is a pretty weak SG. I like smith+ chandler combo though.
    ---
    Michael Jackson was the king of pop. It's time to crown eminem the king of rap.
  • Jan 21, 2013 8:46 pm GMT
    richardson would be starting over hinrich
    ---
    Poetic Justice
    GT: Swizzy Dangles

    Currently using GS cuz I've been a very bad boy

  • Jan 21, 2013 9:47 pm GMT
    Defense looks fantastic and George has superstar potential. Bench is weak and not much in the way of offensive identity/leadership, though.

    From: McGriff67 | #003
    I don't like you because you got rid of Melo and STAT. I don't see a noticeable difference between Amar'e and Smith in this game.


    Amare is one of the worst defensive big men in the league, Smith is an elite defender.
    ---
    "It's just so stupid, isn't it? Beating your wife? I mean, it's YOUR wife. It's like keying your own car." - Jimmy Carr
  • Jan 21, 2013 9:50 pm GMT
    From: Bigtymer113 | #007
    richardson would be starting over hinrich


    Disagree, based on the other bench players listed. Richardson can be a scoring spark off the bench, and this way you have a PG, SG/SF, and PF/C as your first 3 off the bench, rather than PG, PG/SG, and PF/C.
    ---
    "It's just so stupid, isn't it? Beating your wife? I mean, it's YOUR wife. It's like keying your own car." - Jimmy Carr
  • Jan 21, 2013 10:37 pm GMT
    Thanks for the input guys.

    Its funny. When I finished drafting this team, I thought it was one of the worst I have ever created. But in fact, this team is maybe one of the best. I play at allstar difficulty and in game they are all ball hawks and I get several blocks per game.

    The funny thing is that 2k rates this teams offense really high for some reason. We are ranked 2nd in the league. I dont know if that's due to the coach or what. However just like I would expect, we go into super long scoring druaghts as we don't have a go to scorer.

    That is why this team will be godlike if I can retain Smith and land paul without having to give up any major pieces.
    ---
    PSN: illfamous
    New York Knicks: Your favorite team's favorite team
  • Jan 21, 2013 11:54 pm GMT
    Disagree, based on the other bench players listed. Richardson can be a scoring spark off the bench, and this way you have a PG, SG/SF, and PF/C as your first 3 off the bench, rather than PG, PG/SG, and PF/C.

    Hinrich is a defensive liability and would be similar to Ray Allen's role on the heat - have Josh Smith (lebron) drive the lane and kick out. If he starts the other team has the ability to get their SG going early.

    JRich is more solid all around and shouldn't be coming off of the bench, he thrives when he is the starter (Magic, Suns). Telfair is a good scorer and plays similar is Jeremy Lin anyway, so it wouldn't be that much of a difference. Plus if Smith is staying on the court than the offense would primarily run through him and neither JRich or Hinrich, but JRich is a better player and should be a starter, regardless of who is on the bench.
    ---
    Poetic Justice
    GT: Swizzy Dangles

    Currently using GS cuz I've been a very bad boy

  • Jan 22, 2013 12:30 am GMT
    Mizznox posted...
    Defense looks fantastic and George has superstar potential. Bench is weak and not much in the way of offensive identity/leadership, though.

    From: McGriff67 | #003
    I don't like you because you got rid of Melo and STAT. I don't see a noticeable difference between Amar'e and Smith in this game.


    Amare is one of the worst defensive big men in the league, Smith is an elite defender.

    He is fine in the game. Not elite but he is decent and in real life he will be solid this year after Coach gets a hold of him for most of the season.
    ---
    I finally get to change my sig! The New York Knicks are no longer laughing stocks! 2012-13 Atlantic Division Champs! 11/20/12
  • Jan 22, 2013 12:35 am GMT
    From: Bigtymer113 | #011
    Hinrich is a defensive liability


    ... Are you being serious right now? Hinrich is a very solid defender and has never had an issue defending bigger guards.

    I don't think Richardson is a significantly better player, if at all. He's primarily a scorer who has seen his effectiveness in that regard fall off greatly the past few years. He's now a glorified spot-up shooter (half his shots are 3s, averages only 1 FTA per game) and brings little else to the table. Hinrich's shot has been off this year, but he can fulfill that same role while also being able to create for others with the ball and he's a much better defender.
    ---
    "It's just so stupid, isn't it? Beating your wife? I mean, it's YOUR wife. It's like keying your own car." - Jimmy Carr
  • Jan 22, 2013 1:25 am GMT
    ... Are you being serious right now? Hinrich is a very solid defender and has never had an issue defending bigger guards.

    This sentence really makes me want to leave this board and never come back. I can't believe you wake up in the mirror with that thought in your brain.

    Kirk Hinrich? A very solid defender....? I can't believe I'm seriously reading that. He literally is the epitome of a defensive liability. He's not quick enough to guard the smaller more athletic guards (Paul, Rondo, Jennings, Parker) and is too short to guard the taller guards such as Tyreke Evans. If the other guard does bad against Hinrich it's because they're having an off night.
    ---
    Poetic Justice
    GT: Swizzy Dangles

    Currently using GS cuz I've been a very bad boy

  • Jan 22, 2013 2:22 am GMT
    Hmm, I'm really not sure what else I can say here.

    Hinrich has always been known best for his defense. Even as Chicago fans rag on him about his shaky shooting this season they still concede that he is a good defender. Aside from general comments about him declining, I've never seen anyone really criticize his defense, certainly not to the point of calling him a liability. He's smart, committed, and is good at disrupting what an offensive player wants to do. Yes, he's a very solid defender and has never had issues defending bigger guards.
    ---
    "It's just so stupid, isn't it? Beating your wife? I mean, it's YOUR wife. It's like keying your own car." - Jimmy Carr
  • Jan 22, 2013 7:15 am GMT
    Bigtymer is only legitimately saying that because he's white.
    ---
    GT: Dchen40
  • Jan 22, 2013 7:35 am GMT
    Bigtymer is only legitimately saying that because he's white.

    If anything he would be a good defender...usually white american basketball players are exceptional fundamentalists if they aren't tall and clumsy. And I'm white...

    I have friends who are Bulls fans and I've never heard one even concede that he's a good player...

    I think he's a perfect off the bench player who can fit in the same type of role Ray Allen plays. Hinrich made that clutch jumper a few games ago and dropped 22. I will not concede that he is a good defender, as I will take the longer, taller, more athletic JRich over him any day in terms of defense. This year he's averaging 6 and 5 while JRich is averaging 10 and 3 I think. I just think Hinrich's role would be better off the bench.

    But like I said, it wouldn't really matter who starts as the offense would go through Smith.

    Hinrich is certainly not a bad player, but to say he is a very good defender is just weird. He hasn't ever made 1st or 2nd team all defense and I've never seen him make a really spectacular defensive play. But it's whatever really. This question is hypothetical as is so there's really no point in arguing who would be the better fit since we don't know
    ---
    Poetic Justice
    GT: Swizzy Dangles

    Currently using GS cuz I've been a very bad boy

  • Jan 22, 2013 7:37 am GMT
    He actually has made the all defensive 2nd team...but that was one time in 2007.
    ---
    Poetic Justice
    GT: Swizzy Dangles

    Currently using GS cuz I've been a very bad boy

  • Jan 22, 2013 8:03 am GMT
    @Bigtymer113

    why dont you just admit that you are wrong?

    hinrich has been a good defender pretty much his whole career

    try to get underrated good 3 point shooters like reddick/danny green/gary neal

    start danny green n bring hinrich to back up lin and green.

    This team is a monster defensively with 3 players who can be DPOY (george, smith ( although he is erratic at times), chandler)

    and very good in transition. if you get another 2 shooters to space the floor, this team will contend.
  • Jan 22, 2013 11:01 am GMT
    why dont you just admit that you are wrong?

    because he's not "a very good defender"

    i wouldn't even go as far to say that he's even good...MAYBE average.
    ---
    Poetic Justice
    GT: Swizzy Dangles

    Currently using GS cuz I've been a very bad boy

Forum Actions
ForumsNBA 2K13 ForumNBA 2K13 Xbox 360 ForumHow well do you think this team would do ...

NBA 2K13 Boxshot
Not Following

    Game Stats

    Games You May Like

    Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.