Lucent sues Microsoft over Xbox tech
"Out of the box" MPEG-2 decoding capability of Xbox 360 allegedly infringes on telecom company's patent.
Lucent Technologies has filed a patent-infringement suit against Microsoft over the same MPEG-2 decoding technology at the center of a 2003 legal dispute.
According to the formal complaint, filed March 28 in a US District Court in San Diego, the telecommunications-equipment maker is suing Microsoft for patent infringement against Patent No. 5,227,878, titled "Adaptive Coding and Decoding of Frames and Fields of Video," which was issued to Lucent in 1993. The patent concerns MPEG-2 video encoding.
In 2003, Lucent filed infringement cases against Dell and Gateway over several patents, including No. 5,227,878. Because of its indemnity agreements with the companies Lucent was going after, Microsoft filed a countersuit against Lucent that same year.
Although Microsoft won several patent infringement claims on summary judgment, the claim concerning Patent No. 5,227,878 was dismissed without prejudice (meaning the lawsuit can be filed again if the problems are fixed) because of a typographical error in Lucent's patent.
"The judge dismissed the countersuit without prejudice, giving Lucent the opportunity to file for a patent correction, which we did," John Skalko, a spokesman for Lucent, told CNET News.com. "However, between the time of this original dismissal and our resubmission, there was another development. Microsoft issued the 360."
The typographical error in the patent concerned the phrase "compressed video bit stream," which has been corrected to read "compressed digital video bit stream and fields of compressed video bit stream."
The Certification of Correction to the patent that allowed the correct phrasing to be put back in was issued by the US Patent and Trademark Office in October 2005. The certification gives Lucent "the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form." According to the complaint filed by Lucent, the alleged infringement on this patent concerns the Xbox 360's "'out of the box' MPEG-2 decoding capability."
"The patent at issue is one that previously had been asserted by Lucent in connection with patent litigation between the parties since 2003. We're currently reviewing the complaint. Microsoft is an intellectual property company and we respect the intellectual property rights of others," Microsoft said in a statement.
Said Skalko, "We have a case. Otherwise it wouldn't be in court."
Lucent has requested a jury trial and is seeking an injunction against unauthorized use of the technology and unspecified damages.
Latest News
Latest Entertainment Headlines
Daisies' Pace joins Duchovny, Shalhoub, Sheen for Emmy nomination finalists; Britney "snubbed" from guest spot honors.
News Features
Featured Stories
Sony patents new motion-control, touch-screen tech
USPTO applications detail alternative input schemes for "handheld electronic devices."Newsmakers
Q&A: FIFA Soccer 09
FIFA 09 producer David Rutter on new gameplay additions, expanding Be a Pro, whether Australia's A-League is back in the mix, and a possible PS3-exclusive mode.






65 Comments
Its both of there faults microsoft for stealing technolgy and Lucent for being so cheap they just sued nintendo for there infringment next time do some reasearch!
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
this is what america is built on: sueing people for stupid things
Login to rate this comment
/ (-1)
how about get a job and work for ur money
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
It may be that Lucent had this adaptive thing for streaming video and audio over network lines. Something the 360 is capable of doing out of the box. Not so much the actual hardware mpeg2 playback. If it were then lucent would have to sue all companies who make both software and hardware dvd decoders. WinDVD PowerDVD etc. MS is at this time not offering the streaming aspect. Such as for live video chat and such. That is where I see Lucent has a case. What about fair competition? I can make a burger just like burger king and sell it to customers but it isn't the same because I made it with "similar" ingredients. does that mean that if customers like mine, burger king can sue me? MS is using the mpeg2 decoding from ATI not from windows. So ATI has a certain way of doing this and Lucent cant go after them but can go after the company allowing that tech to work out of the box. If MS were to0 switch over all existing and future 360 to a HD dvd drive would that stop this whole thing? Or since the hd can also decode regular mpeg2 streams, would still cause the case to go on?
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
That patent infringement better not be in the hardware....otherwise it's goodbye 360.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
GAH! You can't even hum a tune these days without the songwriter suing for pirating their intellectual property. Blech! Now that Lucent is being acquired, their new parent will have the cash to keep this legal spat going... BLECH BLECH
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
steeljosh36 said:
"the Xbox 360 has had so many problems. Microsoft is prbably getting frustrated."
Oh yeah, so many problems. High Demand. No competition. Yawn. Go back to your rock and don't come out till the PS3 launches.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
teh suez!!!!1
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Keep on kicking Ass MICRO$OFT.....Ha ha ha ha

Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Microsoft could pay them off but it would be more cost efficent to buy out the entire company & get profits from it's patents
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
i hope they are ready to be bought out.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Man this company can't get a break for nothing.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
So M$ flaws again... and people were saying stuff about Sony!
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Patent #5,227,878!!!!! There will come a time when no one will be able to develop anything because of infringement violatiions. Gamespot...better make sure you aren't on anyone's hitlist, else you'll hear from some sue happy company!
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
If I remember correctly, Lucent didn''t patent M-peg 2, but a specific way of decoding Mpeg 2 files. That means that if MS or any other company uses this specific way of doing it, they can be sued for violating the patent. If anyone wants to check, go to the Patent Office web page and look it up.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
boy, I sure didn't see that coming.
it's liked what happened with the force feed back (rumble) on the controllers for both xbox and ps2, the company with that patient sued them both, lets see how microsoft will deal with this, I mean it payed off the company in the previous incident, so I think it will do it again, if not, their royaly screwed, well I think.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
What does a networking company have a video decoding patent for anyways.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
i dont understand how only MSs mpeg 2 decoder is at fault? why not every other dvd player?
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Patent No. 5,227,878, titled "Adaptive Coding and Decoding of Frames and Fields of Video," is stupid... stop piracy then sue microsoft..
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
I have no clue as to whats been said.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
They just need money..thats why they be suing MS
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
the Xbox 360 has had so many problems. Microsoft is prbably getting frustrated.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
...what goes around, comes around.....(food for thought)
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
People are so lawsuit-happy these days. Also, it seems that patents are granted to just about any little thing anymore, as there are over 7 million patents and climbing.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Don't Microsoft get sued on an hourly basis anyway?
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
oh golly gee wilikers not again
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Who cares Micro$oft can afford almost anything
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
OMG THIS WILL TOTALLY KILL THE XBOX. Not really, quite inconsequential to the average gamer. Move along, nothing to see.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
No mention here that Lucent is simply one partner in a much larger complex of companies which collectively claims ownership of MPEG-2.
Who else is there? You guessed it.
Sony, haven't you had enough trouble with Digital Property Rights Management?
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
What the problem with the patient offices. Giving Patients to anybody for anything. Microsoft will proble settle the cases. For million of dollars.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
They should just make the ability to sue big multinational companies part of the constitution... so you know... more people can jump onto this bandwagon of fun.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Does this mean Lucent is going after all companies who offer mpeg-2 decoding "out of the box" such as, oh..let me think...every fricking electronics company that make a dvd player! Or is it because the 360 is also a game player first and a dvd second? Did lucent go after Sony for the PS2 which had out of the box mpeg-2 capabilities?
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Meh, I ain't too worried, nothing MS can't handle.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Well, let's just say I once respected Lucent as a company
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
OMG!!!! im going to jail for using MP2......at least sue them when the format is at least some what good....
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
as much as i despise microsoft, i despise such tactics even more. There should be a law introduced that adds someting called "common sense" to teh constitution. I am sick of lawyers and their loopholes.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Just another frivolous lawsuit. GOD lawyers suck.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
No Phazevariance... if you change code slightly to make it your own (when there is already a patent on it) it's completly illegal and infringes the patent. If the code was created open source for a community of programmers then it's more likly that you can get away with modifying it and making it your own. But the fact remains if you modify code slightly (to make it appear as yours) its just the same as stealing a car painting it a different color to suit you... it's still stealing.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
MS Fed UP...
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
And I just patented the number 0 and 1 on seperate pantents, so anytime computer code uses those two numbers i get $1. From anybody anwhere anytime ever forever! Can't Microsoft just modify the codec slightly so it compresses the video bits slightly differently so it doesnt infringe on the patent or did the patent encoding all together making DivX the next company to get sued?
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Well, if you steal other people pat tech your gonna get caught and run through the system. But it's not like it matters. Microsoft could have to pay the other company 40billion dollars (not likely) and still be filthy rich, it's sickening how much money they have.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Good luck on Lucent getting MS to stop selling the 360 while the case is in litigation. What will end up happening is MS looking at the cost of a trial and possible fines against settling out of court. I bet on the latter since it would most likely be cheaper of the two.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Lucent's just sore that its stock is worthless these days. They'll do anything to make a buck.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
big deal, its pocket change for MS
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
I am sick of this sue hungry world. Now if lucent does have a legit patent. Not something like Harly wanting to patent their sound, or something stupid like that. then They might have a case worthy of my tax money that will go into paying the judge that has to hear the case. Also I would have hoped that Lucent had gone to MS first and said. Hey we have a patent on this. if MS told them to screw off then a law suit is reasonable. But this better not be a waste of money just because they want to cry about something stupid and not talk friendly about it first.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
wow must be a slow day if gamespot is putting this crap up. It will be a few years before a verdict is reached. MS will probably come out the winner.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Hey, I just patented defecating. If infringment occurs for this patent, a fine of 1000 dollars will be awarded to me.
What has this world come to? Stop whining and put some pants on.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)
Wow! I lost a killing on LU a few years ago when the stock went from $30 to approx. $3. I am a fan of the 360, so I hope LU loses the case and gets bad PR.
Login to rate this comment
/ (+0)