ON MovieTome: That 300 sequel finally gets details!
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
TV.com
Metacritic

GDC '08: LucasArts prioritizing PS3 dev, unleashing Force

Star Wars studio's "new baseline" will be Sony's console; Force Unleashed publicly demoed for first time by publisher--which almost made KOTOR3 instead.

SAN FRANCISCO--In recent months, the PlayStation 3 versions of many multiplatform games have been released after their Xbox 360 counterparts--or canceled outright. Others, like Grand Theft Auto IV, have seen both versions delayed because, having optimized the game first on the 360, the developers encountered difficulties with the PS3 edition.

This week at the 2008 Game Developers Conference, a major studio laid bare the pitfalls of cross-platform development on the current crop of consoles--and talked about how it plans to deal with it in the future. In an expansive and informative lecture, Haden Blackman, project lead for Star Wars: The Force Unleashed, discussed which platform the company's "built from scratch" development team began work on in 2005.

"Multiplatform development was one of our biggest challenges," he told the jam-packed hall in the basement of the Moscone Center. After George Lucas famously urged the studio to "go build that game" upon seeing the first test reels from TFU, they began work straight away on Xbox 360 dev kits in late summer 2005--because that was all the studio had.

"It took a very long time for us to reach a multiplatform mentality," said Blackman. The reason? "Until early 2006," LucasArts had no PS3 dev kits whatsoever and, for the sheer sake of moving the project forward, focused on Microsoft's console. "It took months to get enough dev kits to everyone," rued the developer.

The problem was, once LucasArts finally had enough PS3 dev kits to supply the staff members that required them, 360 development of The Force Unleashed was months ahead. Worse still, the 360-optimized early version of the game "didn't translate well" when ported onto the PS3, given the differences between the hardware architecture of the two consoles and the complexity of PS3 development. This led to more complications and pushed the simultaneous launch of The Force Unleashed back further.

Now, however, the impressive-looking game is on track, and Blackman says that, after some hard-learned lessons, LucasArts now has a strategy for future multiplatform titles--develop the PS3 version first. "Our next project will use the PS3 as the baseline, and then apply that to the Xbox 360," he said. He made no mention of the other versions of The Force Unleashed, which are being developed externally.

Scott Steinberg, Sony Computer Entertainment America's vice president of product marketing, stated that virtually every third-party publisher is now developing for the PS3 first. "They all are now, since it's just easier that way," he told GameSpot. He then referenced his long tenure at Sega of America, saying, "Having recently dealt with this myself from a third-party background, I know this is the case." As of press time, Microsoft had not responded to Steinberg's comments.

The Force Unleashed
While Blackman's discussion of dual-platform development was insightful, it was only a small part of his presentation titled "Star Wars: The Force Unleashed: How LucasArts is Building a Game, a Development Team and a Technology Pipeline...At the Same Time." As the title suggests, the developer cast his oratory net wide, detailing how in 2004, he and others were tasked with the "rebooting" of LucasArts' internal development studio. To further complicate matters, this had to be done during a console transition--and at the same time the entire organization was, along with Lucasfilm and Industrial Light & Magic, relocating to a brand-new San Francisco campus.

As it turns out, having ILM in the same building proved to be a boon for LucasArts. It allowed LucasArts to adapt to the celebrated special-effect house's programming and development framework, code-named Zeno. In fact, the overall goal is for LucasArts, Lucasfilm, and ILM to begin sharing digital art assets, development processes, and effects and animation technology as games approach film in terms of realism.

To make The Force Unleashed as realistic as possible, LucasArts created a new engine code-named Ronin. But while the majority of its technology is proprietary, LucasArts had no hesitation about licensing third-party technology. It acquired Havok's physics engines; NaturalMotion's Euphoria for realistic, AI-driven character animations; and Pixelux's Digital Molecular Matter (DMM), for spectacularly destructible environments.

TFU's first public demo
To show off the technology, LucasArts staged what it asserted was the first live public real-time demo of The Force Unleashed, which will be released this summer. Though Blackman preemptively apologized for bugs, there was no nitpicking by the captivated audience during the next five-odd minutes of gameplay.

Earlier in the presentation, Blackman had said that after much focus-testing the most appealing scenario to gamers was to play as a Jedi Knight. From the TFU demo, it was easy to see why. It begins with the game's protagonist, a secret Jedi apprentice to Darth Vader, being dispatched to kill a Jedi who has taken over a TIE fighter production facility. Vader's instructions are simple: Bring back the Jedi's light saber, and leave no witness.

With carte blanche to wreak destruction, Vader's apprentice entered the bay and immediately began tossing boxes at hapless stormtroopers. Then he cut out the middleman by picking up the white-armor-clad soldiers with his Force Grip power and then tossing them into walls and off ledges with Force Push. Whenever a stormtrooper was hurled particularly far, the camera would zoom in to watch the trooper's realistic struggle, since the Euphoria technology instills them with a futile sense of self-preservation.

The results were often hilarious, with troopers clutching onto anything within arm's length to fend off the inevitable. At the denouement of the final battle with the errant Jedi, Vader's apprentice picked up and tossed the battered warrior into the void below the hangar. He flew toward and then away from the camera, with his death screams bouncing around the hall's sound system.

To display DMM's brawn, Blackman had Vader's apprentice smash open steel doors, which gave off a cloud of dusty smoke as they buckled realistically. Then, it was on to a veritable TIE fighter skeet shoot, with the dark Jedi taking out a half-dozen of the spacecraft with boxes and other heavy objects.

What might have been...
A while after the thunderous post-demo applause had died down, Blackman showed a cinematic from the game, in which Vader's apprentice presents his lord with the defeated Jedi's weapon. "Cinematic" was the operative word, with the scene feeling like it was taken from one of the better installments in the six-part Star Wars film franchise.

Indeed, The Force Unleashed is meant to be a seventh installment in the series, falling between the last of the prequels, Star Wars: Episode III- Revenge of the Sith (2005), and the first of the original films, Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope (1977). To that end, LucasArts is pulling out the stops to make it feel like a blockbuster movie, including recording a two-hour soundtrack with the full San Francisco Symphony at Skywalker Ranch. The developers also recorded dialogue using stage actors acting out scenes together while wearing facial and motion-capture rigs to re-create their performances.

The result looked nearly as realistic as the dialogue scenes in Mass Effect, the recent sci-fi game from BioWare, developer of the celebrated Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic series. Ironically, The Force Unleashed almost was a third KOTOR game. Though Blackman never mentioned the forthcoming BioWare/LucasArts mystery project, he did say that during the conceptual stage, he and his team had considered setting their next project in the KOTOR universe. They had also considered making a smuggling game centered around a Han Solo-like character and even an action game with a Wookie protagonist.

That last idea didn't last long, however. "When we presented that, George [Lucas] just stared at us," said Blackman, before setting up one of the biggest laugh lines of the presentation. "He then said, 'I tell you guys about the importance of dialogue, and you pitch me a game with a hero that can't talk?!"

632 Comments

  • Cleaver426

    Posted Aug 5, 2008 11:05 pm GMT

    Ps3 is the base title! Weird!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • K-Grogg

    Posted Aug 2, 2008 7:41 am GMT

    Wow, I am amazed that 360 owners can still be this deluded. It's made blatantly obvious by this article that the PS3 is superior to develop on, their just saying it in a nicer way not to hurt your fragile feelings. =P

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree
  • geryboti

    Posted Apr 12, 2008 12:49 pm GMT

    bullsfan769;I wonder too,and hope

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • JoyousOblivion

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 12:48 pm GMT

    Don't whine about the extra time it takes to get games as the PS3 version takes longer to develop. The PS3 games usually end up loking nicer as a result. (I have a 360 and PS3, so i'm no t a sony fanboy)

    I just hope this Star Wars games is awesome, god knows KOTOR set the bar pretty high.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree
  • HolteEnder4Life

    Posted Apr 3, 2008 11:51 am GMT

    hopefully this will mean that us 360 owners will no longer have to wait longer for a multi-platform game Because the PS3 is a b**ch to develop on.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • bullsfan769

    Posted Mar 31, 2008 7:13 pm GMT

    looks cool..i wonder if effort will be put in the ps2 version

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • MaceKhan

    Posted Mar 27, 2008 8:45 pm GMT

    All versions of this game have been pushed back to Q3. NNNNNNOOOOO!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • ossamesa

    Posted Mar 27, 2008 5:19 pm GMT

    screw you ps3, admit defeat and let 360 unleash the force within it XD

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 4 users agree
  • ryce5

    Posted Mar 26, 2008 2:37 pm GMT

    umm...So what about the Wii version is it still good?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Bloodhawk_DX

    Posted Mar 26, 2008 3:26 am GMT

    I'm sick of having titles delayed for the X360 because of the PS3. Just release the Xbox 360 versions first. If Sony is losing out, so what? They should have made a more developer friendly console.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 5 users agree
  • EchoEcho

    Posted Mar 24, 2008 11:37 am GMT

    SpoonHeroSR: "So why did they Delay the game? Wow I hate how games now a days must be on both consoles whatever happened to the good ol' days when for example games like mario would be only for nintendo and games like sonic would only be for Sega you **** like that can tell which console is better **** graphics!!!"

    Do you know anything about game development, and the difference between "first-party" and "third-party"?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • _HAV0C_

    Posted Mar 17, 2008 8:34 pm GMT

    i would much rather see kotor3 for PC/consoles. Instead they announce this......

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • djfidelone

    Posted Mar 14, 2008 6:25 pm GMT

    @ Goufas_Nation

    I totally agree.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • SpoonHeroSR

    Posted Mar 9, 2008 3:57 am GMT

    So why did they Delay the game? Wow I hate how games now a days must be on both consoles whatever happened to the good ol' days when for example games like mario would be only for nintendo and games like sonic would only be for Sega you **** like that can tell which console is better **** graphics!!!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • MaceKhan

    Posted Mar 5, 2008 10:24 am GMT

    If they make a KOTOR3 I hope it's not an MMORPG, I don't play MMORPG's so I wouldn't get to play it.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 4 users agree
  • bamfer3

    Posted Mar 5, 2008 5:47 am GMT

    i wish they could make something like KOTOR again, that was the best, and mix it with battlefront

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 4 users agree
  • nvfigueiredo

    Posted Mar 4, 2008 9:00 am GMT

    I believe...

    Some day LucasArts will do a new X-Wing/TIE Fighter game, with glorious multiplayer.

    How I miss Wing Commander, X-Wing, Tie Fighter, Descent Freespace... :S

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • MaceKhan

    Posted Mar 2, 2008 7:23 pm GMT

    To Jusik .

    I'm definitely buying this to, and the force powers are gonna be awesome, I'm just saying that I really want both great force combat and great saber combat that flow well together.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • Jusik

    Posted Mar 2, 2008 6:24 am GMT

    To MaceKhan,

    I think you have a point, but theres not many star wars games out there like this one, using the force and all. I somewhat agree whith you there should be at least a decent amount lightsaber combat, but you gotta admit it seems pretty cool. I am definatly Buying it no matter what!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • CUDDIE

    Posted Mar 2, 2008 1:57 am GMT

    yep . this should make things run better. now for them. no more push backs cause the ps3 production time.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree
  • Spartan_418

    Posted Mar 2, 2008 12:10 am GMT

    As long as they don't have to make cutbacks to their 360 games this sounds mostly logical. The only problem I see is that this will lead to early leaks and rumors labeling unnanounced projects as "ps3 exclusives" when they're really just being developed for ps3 first.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 4 users agree
  • redskinStu

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 2:17 pm GMT

    Fanboys (Nin, Mic) aren't gonna like this.
    I wonder if there's some way they report the writer of this story to Gamespot because he wrote something they don't like?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • MaceKhan

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 10:12 am GMT

    To mtt86.

    I agree, strong force powers have their place. But it needs to be balanced with strong saber combat!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • HXCDEW

    Posted Feb 29, 2008 1:41 pm GMT

    PS3 as the lead platform can only benefit the other platforms, as developers will work harder to get the best out of the system so that even when it's ported to 360, it will still be good enough.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • CTP035 posted Feb 29, 2008 10:18 am GMT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    CTP035

    Posted Feb 29, 2008 10:18 am GMT (hide)

    Well it looks like the 360 is not a great system if it can not stand on the same level as ps3, everything has to be dropped down from the ps3 level to the 360 level to work. well i guess microsoft will just have to upgrade and make a new system so you can all buy it and talk about it.

    the thing is the ps3 is harder to work with at the moment, cause it is new, while the 360 pretty much uses the same dev that the original xbox did. i guess microsoft really did their homework and decided not to advance technology.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 11 users agree
  • Great_Ragnarok

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 4:07 pm GMT

    So the X360 is so balanced that it can easily translate a PS3 base game where the PS3 struggles with an X360 based game.hmmmm is this a planned tactic by Sony????

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 6 users agree
  • mtt86

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 2:21 pm GMT

    Is anyone else worried that this game is going to be too force-power heavy? I hope the lightsaber combat doesn't suck

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • YukoAsho

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 7:38 am GMT

    Yeah, wookiee protagonists don't work...

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • SrTVBR

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 5:58 pm GMT

    Want a advice? Stop with the bull and make the god dammit game already! We want, we need KOTOR 3 in our lives!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • jooohnnny

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 5:44 pm GMT

    Stop Flaming people! No where do's this articale say "PS3 is better to work with or how it's way more powerful then the 360, or vice versa. Instead it states what every Dev has been saying from day one " the PS3 is just harder to work with, and more time consuming to get the same end results, PERIOD! I just can't see how that works to anyone favor. If anything you can take away from this is that Sony did a poor job on developing there dev tools and MS really did there home work. But then again this really isn't new knowledge or new facts now is it! But what I cant figure out is how my console is better that yours relevant to this topic in the first place. Kinda sad really.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 7 of 8 users agree
  • jphillips1868

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 4:44 pm GMT

    Blackman worked on Star Wars Galaxies (i forget in what position, but it seems like he was a higher up), before that game went in the toilet.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Merl57

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 2:30 pm GMT

    this game looks good

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 3 users agree
  • daxacid

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 1:52 pm GMT

    All I can say is that I don't care what the base system is, just make the game!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • bochap76

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 11:25 pm GMT

    This article has no value other than to fan the fires of fan-boy arguments. Who cares how a game is developed, or which system is the base system. This game is going to use the same models, textures, and will feature the same content. Whether you buy it on a 360 or the PS3, you pretty much will get the same game. Look at multi platform games currently on the 360 and PS3. Visually they are the same for the most part, why would anyone expect that to change over the next 2 years. Game publishers have this crazy scheme to sell as many games as possible, making the most profit in the process. Developing a game to be superior on a single platform would be foolish from a sales stand point.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 7 of 7 users agree
  • H-A-V-O-K

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 7:56 pm GMT

    dont feel bad tebbit i almost posted the same thing.........almost.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Tebbit

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 5:08 pm GMT

    ....
    ....
    ....
    Damn

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • Luck

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 4:42 pm GMT

    Umm, they just said that in the article Tebbit. No offense.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • Tebbit

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 4:39 pm GMT

    I'd say the reason for developing for the PS3 first is that since it has such complex architecture, transferring that to the Xbox 360 would be a simplifying process rather than an elaboration process, which would be way way quicker than vice versa.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • elagricola

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 10:29 am GMT

    Someone agreed with me I'm sooo happy..... hahahaha Although my spelling sucks.... (keep in mind English is my second language) I agree they inted to make games equally good for either system. The only way to do so would be to do both consoles verions from scratch, which will not happen. Like I said before both GPUs' are diferent thus they both have their strenth and weakneses and probaly one's strenths is the others weakness. Look it up I think that article I read it on this site.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • darkride66

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 9:51 am GMT

    Yuck_Too. When I was referring to warranties expiring en masse, I realize that it's from date of purchase. I was more referring to the bulk of 360's sold in the first couple of years that were more prone to hardware failure. Between this year and next about 10 million consoles will no longer be covered by the warranty, and we know roughly 3 million of those will fail. That's a lot of gamers flying through the air only to discover there's no safety net. Will they all buy new 360's, pay to have them repaired or move on? That's what we have to look forward to this year and next.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • vacancy009

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 8:36 am GMT

    Elag I agree. As far as an upper hand is concerned with multi-platform games any "upper-hand" differences are unintentional. Unless of course they are paid for by the console maker. The developers have a vision and want to achieve it and make it consistent across both platforms to maximize sales. So time isn't necessarily spent developing to all of a systems strengths. That is usually left up to the Exclusive titles.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • elagricola

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 8:14 am GMT

    I think everyone is ignoring the facts. Dev are developing first for the PS3 because it is simpler for them... period. Why is it simpler, because the PS3 is harder to program for. Is that bad? Actually I don't care because I am not doing the programming. This speaks nothing about which console is better. It is a fact that as time passes and Dev get better acquainted with a system they make better games. Look at PS2’s first games and look at recent ones, with the same hardware. There were no firmware updates back then of any kind. If games are better looking on 360 than PS3 (as some people say) then my guess it would be matter of time; it would just be a matter of dev using the PS3 capabilities better. The 360 has an upper hand here because it's easier to develop for, and they have launched first, but if devs are going to program first for the PS3 that could mean a loss for 360ers, just like it could b a loss for PS3ers to have it the other way around. In the end they are going to do what’s best for their business and what’s easier for them.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • vacancy009

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 6:12 am GMT

    Dark I agree Microsoft will more than likely stay on a 5 to 7 year cycle. It's a paradox of sorts because while I don't want to shell out money every 5 years for something new I see the added benefit and completely go with it. As far HD-DVD , It is not essential to gaming, nor is it essential to the success of a console. The PS3 did not need BR to survive, BR however did need the PS3. Lastly sales, the US is far from saturated with 303 million people and under 11 million units sold of just the 360 there is plenty of room for growth for all the consoles. We will just have to wait and see what the future brings, but the 360 still has plenty of life left in it assuming Microsoft doesn't want to mix things up.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • dannyatkinson

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 5:54 am GMT

    I just wish they would make Kotor 3 already.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Yuck_Too

    Posted Feb 26, 2008 5:53 am GMT

    --darkride66 --
    lol...every company is in business to make money and they love to do it with the "next big thing"

    MS has already said 6-year cycle for the consoles...same as Sony strangly enough.

    Hardware changes too quickly (tech doubles every 24-months) so while developers might support older consoles they have hit thier limit and the new ones are far superior.

    PS1 -> PS2 was 6-years look at the difference
    PS2 -> PS3 was 6-years look at the difference

    And while the PS3 will be around 10-years from now no one is going to be bragging about it.

    There is no such thing as future-proof in tech.

    Oh...and the 3-year warrenty is from date of purchase...buy one today you got 3-years...not sure what you thought was going to happen but they don't "expire in masse"

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 4 users agree
  • darkride66

    Posted Feb 25, 2008 7:59 pm GMT

    vacancy009. Agreed. It's up to the manufacturer to pull the plug. We're talking MS here. Their whole business is built around marketing and selling the "next best thing" from software to hardware. People who think MS isn't going to pull the plug on the 360 when sales go soft haven't been paying much attention. That and a quickly saturated US market, poor penetration anywhere but North America, developers switching to the PS3 as lead, the downfall of HD-DVD and continued RROD issues (and the 3 year warranties soon to begin expiring en masse), hardware showing it's limitations, and nothing close to the 2007 year in terms of lineup anytime in the foreseeable future all equals a new 360 with Wii-like abilities sometime soon. Really, what choice do they have?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 5 of 11 users agree
  • krazykubes

    Posted Feb 25, 2008 7:34 pm GMT

    i own a 360 and cant wait for this game! almost considering holding off till it drops on ps3, and i get one

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 4 users agree
  • senjutsu

    Posted Feb 25, 2008 7:27 pm GMT

    the game is looking hot!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • vacancy009

    Posted Feb 25, 2008 5:34 pm GMT

    @Dark The reality is each console has the ability to last as long as the manufacturer is willing to support it and people purchase the games. That is why PS2's still sell. The original xbox would probably still be selling had all game support and production stopped. Sony says that the PS3 is built for the future and they intend to support it for 10 years. I think they intend to do that, but what they don't tell you is they will watch the competition and be developing in the background themselves. If the need arises they will release a console within the next 6-8 years to compete with whatever it's competitors come out with because technology moves so very fast. They will still support the PS3 but release something new. The PS3 may be around in 7 years but it will not be competing at the same performance level as any of the newly released consoles. Sony says its future proof, I don't care who says it there is just no such thing

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 3 users agree
advertisement