Japan's Nikkei news service says Sony is planning a mid-sized lineup to launch alongside its PlayStation Eye- and light wand-based system this fall.
Last week, Sony announced that it had pushed back the launch of the PlayStation 3 Motion Controller to the fall from a previously announced spring launch. Commenting on the delay, Sony Computer Entertainment CEO Kaz Hirai implied that the reason for the delay was so that his company could finalize a robust launch lineup for the system, rumored to be called the "PlayStation Arc."
"We will continue to work to have a comprehensive portfolio of attractive and innovative games for the motion controller, not only from SCE Worldwide Studios but also from the third-party developers and publishers, whom we have been working closely with," explained Hirai.
Yesterday, a short article on the Tokyo-based Nikkei news service's English edition reported that "about 10" games will support the PS3 Motion Controller on day one. Though the article offered no further details, the expanded Japanese version of the same article said that "pet training games and other sports [titles]" would be amongst the system's launch lineup.
Nikkei did not reveal how many of the PS3 Motion Controller games would be from Sony or other publishers. To date, only two third-party publishers, Capcom and Electronic Arts, have announced support for the PS3 Motion Controller. Capcom has confirmed the Japan-only Resident Evil 5: Alternative Edition will use the light wand- and PlayStation Eye camera-based control scheme. (The Western version of the Alternative Edition, March's Resident Evil 5 Gold Edition, will not support the new technology.) The latter has not specified any titles, although a leaked EA Canada developer's resume indicated a PS3 Motion Controller-based edition of EA Sports Active is in development.
10 games? why are they gouging the public again? should be 10 games on one disc free. but they are all going to be rubbish like their half arse sixaxis schemes.
It's too bad everyone has such a poisoned view of motion based gaming. First, I do agree with anyone who hates how poor the Wii's motion controller is, but both Microsoft and Sony will be offering motion controls that make major leaps over Nintendo's. In general, the Wii's crappy control can't allow any hardcore games to be made. It is a weak gimmick. On the other hand, Sony's new controller tracks you at 60 fps with 1:1 motion. That means precision with no lag. Imagine sword play in a game. The number of moves you could do with a motion controller like this are unlimited. When it comes to something like sword play, this will be more fun than using buttons guaranteed.
The question is: With the success of the Wii, will this new tech be focused in hardcore gaming? Being the game's industry just business for the executives, Sony definitely is thinking on all the money Nintendo won the past few years with his friendly-family plans...
I can't wait to get my hands on this technology as long as they have games that incorporate the shield/sword and archery concepts into a game, i mean that is pretty cool.
just develop a game like that sword and shield demo with online multiplayer and you have a really good start. But I think I'd need a stick to move around just like the wii has.
I wonder if these are 10 full games or 10 arcade games. All in all , I feel this is going to let people down
@mellow09 i never said it track body movement but where ever u move the controller it in turn move where u move unlike the wiimote where it only move to the position on the screne at which u point it at. so Theoretically speeching motion controller move where ever your body moves.
personally, I think it's the best motion sensor xD The NatArc Wiimote xD Like in RPG games, Shooters, Damn strategy(C&C), Maybe even at driving (dunno about driving yet). Natal is good but like what cytheh said:"with natal, it's fun to drive just by mimicking a wheel. But comes to shooter game, i think it's impossible to mimic aiming at something." so ya I think Arc is the best for me.
i'm not interested about this anyway, but if they make something interesting with this thing...i'll think about it
I've played the wii and i have to say the motion controls for it are VERY glitchy. the ps3 wand's motion control seems way more fluid with actions than the wii.
does anybody really think this will make RE5 Alternative/Gold any better, you'll probably be pissed you bought it for that reason alone and go back to using your superior duel analogs
"Capcom has confirmed the Japan-only Resident Evil 5: Alternative Edition will use the light wand- and PlayStation Eye camera-based control scheme. (The Western version of the Alternative Edition, March's Resident Evil 5 Gold Edition, will not support the new technology.)" lolwat Capcom fail
But if they develop a excellent tactical over the shoulder( third person) shooter they already have one person buying those magic wands.
@Bigbosswato It tracks hand movements, not body movements. The wii's balance board uses pressure to track body movments. For example, you can stand on it, flap your arms (without controller) and the image will flap its arms, exactly as you flap your arms. Crouch, and it'll crouch, etc. That is far more advanced than this. Yup, this does track hand movement wonderfully. But they are behind both Microsoft and Nintendo in this tech.
@mellow09 Have u seen the footage for the motion controller it does track movement it is based the same principals as a motion capture studio just miniaturized. i dont see how the motion controller is anywhere near the same as the wiimote.this look to be way more fluent when in motion where as the wiimote is lagy
@RY4N357 : Actually i think ps3 motion control is based on the cam too, it dectects the position of the wand (as natal detects your hand). the wand is more for the buttons. I mean both has its strength, maybe with natal, it's fun to drive just by mimicking a wheel. But comes to shooter game, i think it's impossible to mimic aiming at something.
The 360's Project Natal uses NO controller, just a motion sensor type camera. PS3 uses a motion controller just like the Wii does. I think Sony should've just created a new type of motion control technology that would be better than Natal.
@ryosashi natal could mean putting in those terrible tacked on things(like six axis) like where you have to like jump up and down really fast to defuse a bomb or those annoying things
This is cool, for sure, but it just isn't 'there'. Nintendo has realized that you need more than tracking hands, you need to track the body. Hence wii fit board, which is outstanding. Natal tracks voice, has full body movement, and has actual interface draw in world and use that. This is just a trigger and controller, nothing more than the wii came out with.
i say they should make a GOOD harry potter game, where they combine the bluetooth headset with the light wand in casting spells.
@OldstupidGeezer Crapware is to be expected with childish gimmicks such as these. What's even worse is it'll probably still sell at the $60 price point. Wii's games are still a bunch of crap, though. There's no denying that. :P
i have just as little faith in these games as i do in the Natal games. the one big diffrence is that Natal can be "half used" like as minor addtions to games while you use the controler (aka: point out squad movement, cover peeking..ect.) The PS3 motion will basicly have to just a be a better Wii, which the wii so far has been mostly a giant gimmick, where as natal atleast has a slight chance to be diffrent....but again, no faith in either (and yes i own all 3 systems)
hopefully they actually have 10 separate games line-up, it's going to suck really bad if those 10 games were really one Sony version of Wii Sports with 10 mini-games on it anyhow, still plan on using my two thumbs to play RE5
finally...fanboys will have to stop making fun of wii games. CAUSE ALL OF YOU WILL HAVE CRAPWARE VERY SOON
@Cetanu07 if you dont really care then why post at all? Its just a question. I agree that most of these games will probably not be all that good. Sony has to make something big happen in order for the ARC to be successful at launch.
it all sounds interesting but the first thing that comes to my mind is this: a stream of $60 games with slightly above average graphics and extremely shallow gameplay that are fun for a solid hour and then collect dust. i really hope someone develops something that is the equivalent of Wii sports for the PS3, that might get my interest.
10 games that either I will not care about or 10 games that are redone with motion control. Either way gamers lose because game companies are wasting resources that they could put toward developing new games.
there's a good possiblity of Wii gameplay with PS3 grafix. just the tech demos alone would be fun... but well have to wait and see.
Wait, is RE5 not getting motion support in the USA? I might reconsider buying the "Arc" if that's true.
wow, I remember when the game Lair came out..it got terrible ratings everywhere and everybody hated it because you could only use the motion control to play it. I had no problem with it and thought it was a great game. But now everybody can't wait for this motion control to come out...
Playing Xbox One games on somebody else's console will also require a check-in every hour. Full Story
- Posted Jun 6, 2013 11:41 pm GMT
Xbox boss Don Mattrick believes concerns over connectivity are overblown, recommends Xbox 360 for those without an Internet connection. Full Story
- Posted Jun 12, 2013 1:52 am GMT