Call of Duty popular because it feels 'fluid' claims Treyarch

That's probably true.  It's not like people buy it for the balance or developer support...

so in conclusion.....BF3 need a better frame rate and COD needs better resolution.

until then, most people will play the game which is more fun which is COD at the moment.

60 frames per second is what sold me. gives you full control of your character and that's why the multiplayer became so popular.

I dont give a damn about your crappy graphics. I care if the game is fun. And the cod series, i lost hope after they hypothetically decided that they just cant make a Call of Duty 5.... Bring on the clones!! they said

i wish they would include that Cod's native resolution is 600p LMAO

I want to thank Activision with voice from most players in world ,we are happy to see New game every year thank you.. we all  agree with this 199%, We love Outdated graphic games, with Soo manny inovations every year with thousand DLC every month (i'm getting exicted with every new map Bought every dlc wohooo ), i'ts so cool Gj ,Treyarch is doing most amazing and hard thing ever, it's damn hard to do ctrl+a ctrl+v. Soo EA greedy bastards we Don't need way more Cool BF games from you we Don't like amazing graphics with Frostbite engine 2.0, neither we want tank, jets and Helicopters we want Buggy crap game tha get's boring in 1 week. Suck it noobs :)))) 

or you can play pc and get 60fps on both games lol

Bf3 is really for next gen console just they ain't here yet. Had to sacrifice heaps just to get it to run on current gen.

It's funny that someone at Treyarch says that, when Modern Warfare is perfectly fluid while World at War and Black Ops are clunky and jittery at times.

treyarch is gutter filth and bastardize everything they touch.  Don't get me wrong, Infinity ward is no better, since all the main players left, leaving only the interns, temps and gofers behind to tend to the franchise.  

So this is how they defend their crappy graphics.

Meh, FPS is only necessary for reaction time in Multiplayer. Most films are shot in 24FPS and no one knows the difference. 

Or you buy a PC and lol at these posts. 

Call of Duty popular because it feels 'fluid' and is 'easy mode' claims Treyarch

Fixed.

These kids nowdays are so blind you could release a Call of duty Easy-bake Oven they would still buy it, just look at the amount of COD Elite subcribers out there. Don't give us crap like ''it runs at 60fps'', they couldn't care less about that.

bf3 could push 45 frames on 600p, its so not important to have 60fps that they sacrificed that to have 720p

oh REALLY Treyarch?????? I didnt know it was popular because it was accessible...

what idiots. Yes we all know its very easy to play and supposedly runs at 60 FPS which means nothing at all. Most gamers have no idea what that even is let alone see a difference. If you claim theres a massive difference between 30 and 60 your a liar, there isnt. 

Its not hard when your garbage engine hasnt changed in a decade and looks so bad that your games look like they are xbox games. Games are not all about graphics but for a greedy company who has billions from this franchise youd think they would be able to have a dev team that could make a new engine every few years.

they obviously have to market these things about their games because what else do they have? The same EXACT gameplay over and over with a few perks here and there and the same imbalanced kill streaks. The games should be like 29.99 and sold as DLC.

in truth cod is so inferior in any aspec to any modern multiplayer fps that they have to appeal to something as stupid as giving value to the fact the game is so old it runs at 60fps on 7 years old console hardware

 CALL OF DUTY DONT HAVE 60 FPS, it is reaches 60 fps in some moments but most of the time the fps count is very near bf3 console frame rate, check digital foundry frame rate analisys on black ops

Ironically I found Battlefield 3 to be much more smoother than MW3 (and also much more worthwhile).

some americans are stupid, some teenage americans are really stupid, teenage american console players are super stupid, teenage americans console players that never played a fps before 2007 are incredibly stupid, so when they released a "go be a super soldier in iraq" game in 2007 all these bunch of stupid people bought it, despite the fact that there was better shooters out there, with keyboard and mouse, for 32 plus players etc etc, activision released the right garbage in the right moment for the right stupid people, now they must stick with it to not disapoint the stupid

Everyone can hate on CoD all they want, but honestly this franchise is a "cash-cow" getting milked every year by their huge fanbase. It is the most anticipated game every year, and has the biggest midnight launch lines I have ever seen every year. They must be doing something right.