Molyneux talks Fable III Natal support, Cleese to play butler, Fable II sells 3.5 million

Rofl Thermonuclear explosion?? That guys a riot :p

if thes game is full with natal I am not buying if x-box makes it so you have natal to play games I am play my ps3 or my wii

People, natal will not be a required thing to play the game, if you have it it will just be an additional feature.

I loved the last two fable games. Yeah, Fable 2 was a bit short, and it had some funky glitches, but it was still a great game. Fable 3 sounds awesome, i can't wait to get it. I was worried about the whole Natal, but i heard that the game is like, controller based, or something, just that it adds some different stuff to it. I think.

i hope the game comes out sooner than expected so i can play already jajajajaj

I'm waiting for the day when the anthropomorphism of good and evil isn't represented by judeo-christian angel/devil images.

i want to get this, but if i have to get the freaking natal for it, they lost a damn sale.

Wait, I thought the last 2 installments were action adventure?

i loved the first two, and this one looks just as good..^_^ BUT.........i hope that peter can keep more than half of what he promised this time because i don't want this game to be RE released

God no please not natal. Please...

please oh please do not use natal. I will not buy this game if I have to waste more money on another console gimmick

John Cleese is kinda the man.

The combat seems about as pathetic as fable 2....I doubt I will be wasting any money on this excuse for a game...and who honestly gives a crap about using NATAL in this game? oh yah! I get to hump at my tv, sounds real exciting.

Wow fable 2 only sold 3.5 million. I am shocked. Sales should of been alot higher this game is amazing. They need to advertise fable 3 alot on tv when its almost due to come out.

not my piece of cake,,,,,,but thanx any ways.....

my only problems with fable 2 was the length and the map size but i enjoyed it, and i cant wait to try this game out

am yet to give fable a try its just that am a shooter person and there are just way too many great shooters out there that am still to play, so i keep delaying getting fable

woot John Cleese! FTW

I remember buying the half-assed collector's edition, because they were in such a hurry to release the game they had to take half the stuff out of it. Still it was a easy to pick up RPG that was funny as hell to boot. Fable 2 was the perfect example of why you don't take a game developed for an older system and revamp it for a newer system. God of War 2 may have suffered the same fate in hindsight.

I finished Fable II and really hope Fable III will have some good improvements in gameplay and story.

All onboard the short bus for streamlined gaming!

Molyneux talks up his games because he believes that they could make a game that is as perfect as he describes. Its not HIS fault they are not included, he ahs a team of people who do all the hard work and maybe not all his ideas make the cut. Your being a bit harsh. And on top of that i really enjoyed fable 1 + LC and Fable 2. Spent over 100 hours in each game (well over). Molyneux is a pioneer, he wants to make the perfect game, and maybe one day he will. Like he said, he is working on the weaknesses of every game he creates which is a good thing. I guess we will see what will happen i guess ^_^

Fable II for PC ... I sold

Sweet, sounds like a winning combo for a great franchise.

That's a great support

John Cleese is always funny, and I think he goes well with Fable's very British style of humor.

At least Natal is the cost of a game, and maybe they will put together a nice bundle for the game and Natal. Naw, they'll probably just make a system bundle with an xbox, fable 3 and Natal. But here's to hoping.

played fable one because i had very high hopes for the game, and it was OK. borrowed fable 2 because i was dissilusioned about the series. won't even touch fable 3. first 2 were mildly above average but this quote, "Molyneux started his session by looking back at the success of Fable II but also reflecting on its weaknesses. Originally hamstrung by its role-playing game status, Molyneux is now keen to position the Fable franchise as an action adventure game" is gonna make it so im not even going to bother with this.

Quote: "How many of you bought Fable II and didn't finish it?" (Lots of people in the audience raised their hands.) "Yeah, quite a few, you bastards."--Peter Molyneux, on the decision to make Fable III's features more transparent. I don't get it. So Fable III is going to be shallow? And Fable III will no longer be an RPG? What?

I think we all know molyneaux talks up his games having all these features that never end up being in there.

I'll stick to fallout and elder scroll. Fable broke my 360 it was last game I played before the screen dead even the system know it suck't lol.

The inner struggle in me is a battle between not purchasing this game on account of it's RPG status, and purchasing it because it has John Cleese.

C'mon Peter. I know you don't want to hear this, but scale back your dreams a little, and deliver on them. I love your vision, but you over reach. Do fewer things, do them right, and then you won't have to redo them in the next game. THey'll be done and you can focus you energy on another concept and not be distracted with fixing mistakes from previous games. And I get your TOUCH concept, but there is no touch with Natal. THere's no tactile feedback which is key to touch. A beggar grabbing my virtual arm will equate to me the exact same way whether I'm holding a controller or not.

I . . . need . . . this. . . badly. . .

am i the only one who thought fable 2 was a really good game just rather short??? combat was easy too but still fun, i cant wait to play this one... hoping its longer though!! i want a full world experience of albion this time

hmmm, using 1 weapon auto upgrades it. Decent idea but in the end we'll all end up using just a single weapon

lol I like how they talk as if doing something like farting to impress a woman is silly...whereas before it wasn't? But yes, of course its good they changed this.

Fable 2 was just too immature, its put me off the series

Natal is a stupid idea. Natal and Fable 3 is even stupider.

I actually defended Peter Molyneux a lot when it came to the first Fable game, and I still enjoy Fable: The Lost Chapters. But Fable 2 was just a horrible disappointment. It was jerky, glitchy and, after all Molyneux's talk of trying to make us feel emotion in games with regards to our family, it let me down horribly. Out of the two children my hero had, one had a different skin colour than both my hero and his wife and he later disappeared without explanation, and the other got stuck standing next to my doorway and didn't react to anything. Plus, I have issues with its attitude towards the Silver Key chests, the Demon Doors, unlockable weapons, its frankly offensive portrayal of religion just to fit in with the "atheism: your either with us or you're an idiot" attitude here in the UK, its repetition, its lack of a final boss in spite of the first game having one and so forth. After that much, I refuse to defend Molyneux any longer. The thing is, when Molyneux and Lionhead do things right, they make great games. Aspects of Fable 2 are great, such as the gambling. But something like Fable 2 shows what happens when they do lots of little things very badly. They create a mountain of problems. And now they're trying to win me over on buying Fable 3 ... by having a butler who'll lay out my hero's clothes for me?

I'll pass on Natal, I'll get Fable 3 but after Fable two I won't get my hopes up...just a dissapointment -_-

Actually its about time for them to get a descently known actor in there,Id like to see a kick ass cast in Fable 4.Natal seems cool but for Fable? idk....

Go get back bullfrog and make dungeon keeper 3 where we can use Natal to pick up creatures :D

I want this to work, but after Fable II's failure to deliver. Im skeptical and Molyneux, I am dissapoint

@icehearted Guy I totally agree with you. Molyneux says a lot of things...Very few of them are ever true. He said fable 2 was going to be open world...I say boulder crap to that. its a bunch of linear parths that have been pulled out a little wider to give a sense of open-ness. I think that touch thing is going to fall flat on its face

hope this is good stuff, and not over hype like so many of his games...

meh im skipping it anyway, first one disapointed me so if you dont impress me at first. I spend my hard earned money somewhere else so never played fable 2 and never will. Plus The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind was a much better game than Fable.

Cmon Peter, at least don't disappoint us this time like Fable II. It was nice, but not as epic as the first one...

:lol: he's a funny guy. Wow 3.5 million sales x $100 games = a billionare! I like the idea of John Cleese in the game I just hope he runs the castle better than fauty towers :lol:

I am looking forward to it. Molyneux always has intersting and creative ideas for his games. This twitter inspired idea sounds neat especially when you are a ruler of a nation. Also this touch mechanic could work better then the emotion thing in Fable II, I wonder what the Natal support will be?