Resident Evil 6 DLC out December 18

 @y3ivan  @DeadPhoenix86  @HKILLER88888 disagree. look at lost planet 2. had DX11 too, and was MTframework as well.

 @DeadPhoenix86  @HKILLER88888 MTframework is not coded for DX11. Also MTframework is using their own API thats why it a bit difficult to port to the PC (GPU API)

 @HKILLER88888  well problem will be. they have to optimize it for various of different hardware. plus they likely add DX11 to the game. so that needs time as well.

 @Chaos_Dante_456 You mean taking out 10 of the game's aspect would make it not resident evil? You could say the same thing about every Call of Duty games. Take out Captain Price, the Shakespearean dialogue and the name Call of Duty and it's just like any other fps in the market out there.

What about the Ustanak, a nod to Nemesis, the zombies, the C virus which is created from the T veronica virus + the plagas, the disgusting Raspak whatever monster that looks like the leechman + ET, the running gag of helicopters crashing down for some reason, the giant monster from Chris's campaign, the bee monster and the amazing boss fights with enemies that is so mindbogglingly impossible to describe? The in game emblem collectibles reveals files that's definitely related to past Resident Evil games from 1 to 5. There is no way in hell that these things are not Resident Evil related.

 @Kaz32  @Andava Yeah it still draws in money oddly enough, but then again it's all in the name. Killing it off would be best for the integrity of the series but yeah it's a cash cow right now so I doubt too that they'll let it go.

As far as RE6 being RE at the core...i beg to differ remove the references to Umbrella/Wesker, the BSAA, and Raccoon City change the character names and appearances and I doubt many would ever have compared it to Resident Evil. There isn't much outside the name that makes it "Resident Evil" at it's core. But again i could care less anymore if it maintains the "RE feel" anymore just as long as they make a good and cohesive game

The RE characters have never been the well developed.Can't really understand the attachments to such bland characters other than their design/familiarity.  As far as DMC goes it hasn't even come out yet so it's success/failure has yet to be determined. Yeah I'll admit being offput to Dante's redisign and personality change, but yeah the game (atleast from the demo) does maintain good combat/combo mechanics.

 @Chaos_Dante_456  @Andava  Killing the series is impossible by this point. Look at Revelations, there's bound to be a second one seeing how successful that is. The fact that Revelation's going to PS3 and Xbox360 proves it best. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if it's going to be well liked or not. On the 3DS it's better than any games on that device, but on consoles? With ridiculous looking characters, tedious backtracking, stiff controls and this stupid "scan" gameplay mechanics to get green herbs? I think people who just say "Revelations is better" all the freaking time without even playing that game will be disappointed when they actually played it. I can see the comments section saying "this game sucks!" later in the future, but hopefully that won't be the case.

Capcom's taking the direction of the game well I would say. It's still Resident Evil to the core even with the change in gameplay style, well not really since there's Leon's scenario which compensates for the lack of zombies in 4 and 5. The only thing that will buttfuck the entire series is another Operation Raccoon City and if they somehow make RE7 into a city simulator, an RTS, or a racing game like Twisted Metal, or make it RE in space. Banjo Kazooie Nuts and Bolts is an example on how it has ruined a franchise completely. And Capcom's new DMC. It's funny how a change in character destroys the entire franchise even though it still is Devil May Cry in gameplay.

If they make RE7, I want to see HUNK, Nicholai and Billy Coen taking part in it. The reunion will make lots of deaths and outbreaks though, so not really recommended.

 @Andava  @Kingdededee  @Kaz32 Well put. At this point I don't care what they do with the series just do it WELL. But killing off the series may be the best bet at this point.  

 @Kingdededee  @Kaz32  @Chaos_Dante_456 You couldn't be further from the truth...RE6 was slammed for trying new things and doing them wrong. That's the difference. I think the game was doomed though anyway. It was going to be a Damned if you do, damned if you don't type scenario. People would bitch either way.

 @Chaos_Dante_456 I have no problems with any reviewer that states everything about the game and with good reasons why they give their score. This review is what a liar that can say whatever he wants does. One of the few times that I can honestly say that a reviewer is just lazy and just accentuating the negatives without thinking the positives as what an objective reviewers should do.

 @Chaos_Dante_456 Then you have not played RE4 and 5 at all if you found the game unplayable, or you don't know how to play these games right. It's all about headshot + melee at the right time. My point is 4.5 is an insult that deserves to be given for mediocre games with little to less reasons to replay again, like Kane and Lynch Dog Days that is only 4 HOURS, or Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallow. Wait, that game is dogshit. That's what you call a Gears of War knockoff that has destroyed the entire franchise. And it's only 3 HOURS MAX.

You want to agree to the reviewer, fine. But think about his complaints: does the negatives hinders the score to 4.5 on factual and reasonable grounds? QTE's, action set pieces, constantly ripping control from you which is just stupid since I don't understand what part of the game has your controls get ripped, and "bad controls and camera" which I found hard to believe? The only good thing the guy said is good voice acting, intriguing narrative structure and great sound effects. What about the singleplayer experience that's up to 30 hours+, the 100+ unlockable character extras, various skills that allows replayability, Mercenaries mode, Agent Hunt mode, Ada Wong's singleplayer/multiplayer hybrid that lets you help other human players mid game, and the awesome bosses like the Ustanak, Simmons and Carla? How the fuck are those things not mentioned? This game would got a 7.0 from all that, not a 4.5.

 @Kingdededee  @Kaz32  @Chaos_Dante_456

  i deff enjoed playing ressi 6, sum parts left me fustrated but everything else i enjoyed it.

 @Kaz32  @Chaos_Dante_456 

There is so much truth to this post, Black ops gets praised for doing the same thing over and over again, while resident evil gets slammed for trying new things differently, and for the most part it works.

 @Kaz32 Well they are still a videogame news site. And this is news about a videogame. it's not promoting it's simply stating what's new and going on. Noone is obligated to please others with a review. But they do have an obligation to report on things many may be interested to know whether the person who rights the article likes the game or not.

Also I'm certainly no COD fan (never owned one) but i have played a few of the games they and aren't bad they just lack innovation to justify so many & frequent sequels. They are certainly better shooter than RE6

Personally i don't know if I would have went with a 4.5 either. But there were times I found the game unplayable. I only really enjoyed it because of playing with my homeboy, and we just cracked jokes on the obsurdity of the story as well as the bad game design. &.5 is probably a bit geneorous it's about a 6.5 or 5

And one review score should never be judged against someone else's review on a supposedly better/worse game. Yeah Last time I checked GS was made of several reviewers who are all different people. The negatives were clearly stated and they were right.