just keep the online passes or implement a pass system like it for all games buy the game new and it plays buy it used and you have to buy a pass for a small price off the relevant services (PSN, XBL) to get it to play i think that would work the stores still get money from the used game sale, the gamer would still be saving as used games are usually pretty cheap so the overall cost is still cheaper then buying new and the developer will still be getting some money back for it so everyone is happy
VP of Worldwide Studios says Sony understands secondhand market is "massively important"; full vision will become clear in "good time."
Sony vice president of Worldwide Studios Michael Denny has promised the company will "do the right thing" with regard to used games on the PlayStation 4. Speaking to CVG, the executive described the issue as one of serious importance.
"It's a massively important issue and I understand why it's one that keeps coming up and will keep coming up, because people want to know what the exact stance is," Denny said.
"In relation to points like that, of course we're mindful of what the game development community wants and what the wider industry issues are with those things. I think in good time that will become clearer," he added.
Denny did not provide a simple yes or no answer, but said Sony will do right by developers and consumers alike.
"It's not something that I feel I have any further announcement or comment to make on, other than to acknowledge with you that it's a massively important issue and of course we are going to do the right thing," he said.
It has long been rumored that the PS4--along with Microsoft's rumored Xbox 720--will block secondhand titles in some fashion. Sony has even applied for a patent related to blocking used games. However, the analyst consensus is that both platforms will play used games.
Sony president of Worldwide Studios Shuhei Yoshida last week confirmed that used games will play on the PlayStation 4. However, it was not made clear if users would have full access to secondhand titles or if they would need to pay to activate the game as a second owner.
"When you purchase the disc-based games on PS4, it should work on any hardware. So that's what I'm saying," Yoshida said at the time.
PC gaming is graphics, lighting, I've yet to see a single player PC level match the shell shocked madness of certain levels of Killzone 2 or Killzone 3, the area where you have to get to the elevators while that giant mech's legs are crashing through... it's pure shell shock inducing madness and no PC game ever achieved such a feat... SO I just hope Sony's first party developers don't just use Unreal engine, even though it has many unknown strengths I just don't want more SHINIER PC generic shooters, I want the REAL Killzone experience fully realized and amped up on the new hardware via proprietary game and graphics engine.
Sony is playing it safe with the industry but sitting on the fence with gamers. I have a feeling that it might bite them somewhere in the end. The fact is if a developer wants to put a lockout in their game then that developer should state it to consumers so they can decide if they want to buy that developer's games or a specific game. For me it would mean not buying games from certain developers because I know that they sell lemons and would prefer not to get stuck with junk.
@XAF1 you're not very intelligent obviously... we need to shut down big box game stores like Gamestop etc, they are the problem. They rip off US and they rip off game publishers and developers period. If you want to sell via ebay etc, then I'd say that should be allowed, after all you can do what you want with what you bought, but when you deal with places like Gamestop you're doing ALL THE WORK FOR THEM, you bring them the product, you more than likely bought new from them, that's where publishers get their cut, BUT then when you bring it back to sell or trade in, you get raped and so do the publishers, because everything penny places like Gamestop makes off used games is pure hand delivered profit margin. They didn't pay you to ship it to them and the publishers and developers don't get any of that profit, only Gamestop does and the idiots that bring them their products make next to nothing on the exchange.
Stores like GameStop are not the problem... I agree that GameStop sucks, but for different reasons that don't apply here. Whether or not you use GameStop to sell your games for next to nothing is your choice. They don't force you to sell to them. It's a rip-off, yes, but it's your choice. Second-hand games don't affect game publishers in any significant way. The vast majority of people who by second-hand games are mostly in one of two different groups. The first group is the people that think the game just isn't worth the price of a new game. And the second group are the people who can't afford new game prices.
If someone thinks the game isn't worth the price new and find that they can't use it second-hand, then they're more than likely just not going to play it. The second group can't afford it unless they can get it second-hand. And, as far as the industry suffering because of second-hand games, it's odd that the net worth of the gaming industry continues to increase every year and a research group has estimate that it will reach 83 billion dollars by 2016. That's mostly thanks to mobile and online gaming. But the simple fact is, if you make a great game then people will want to play it as soon as it comes out. If game developers want more money, they should make better games. Simple as that. It's like the old and accepted thought that piracy kills the movie, music, and gaming industry. A lot of research has shown that the effect from piracy is negligible at worst and usually totally insignificant. Consumers just want a different consumption model. Look at the success of Steam, Netflix, Hulu, etc. Consumers want easier access. Give them that and piracy hurts no one. Try to live in the past and your business model will be the death of you, not piracy.
Either way, I don't intend on buying a console (a.k.a. Extremely limited PC that is next to impossible to upgrade) to play games on that becomes outdated after 6 months. I choose to avoid all this crap by having a much more cost-effective PC. But, that's a story for another time.
if you are talking to me, I'll tell you this: when you buy online for the most part, you are buying from other gamers. there are other websites where you can trade your games (or other items) for other games (or other items). both of those online service give you what you want for less and you don't have to involve yourself with the likes of gamestop.
Whether its next gen or the gen after, one day used games will be no more, the stories and rumours are simply for a future purpose... for you to get used to the idea of it, and for the fuss to die down when it actually happens.
make digital downloads 10-20% off RRP and all these problems go away.
Block them.... I buy all my games new anyway, let the devs make the money they worked for, I bet none of you would like it if you went to work and only got paid half the time for it. I'm all for complete block of used games, we are out there, its just these kids don't understand why its a problem, they assume its the evil mega corps (too much TV, what can you do?) or a more reasonable response would be charging you an unlock fee... you all cry about Micro transactions and day 1 DLC (any DLC actully) well if you buy used games, you're the reason these things exist, and I got stuck with them too even though I wasn't part of the problem.
no used games... count me in.
@Moi_Hahaha You know, some of us buy used games cause that is what they can afford. At 60 dollars for new games, that just means I decide to give up on gaming, I can always compromise and waste my time on .99 cent iphone games (not as good, but for my budget a lot healthier and will still be fun).
As some one else said, the people who buy used games either, 1. Don't think the game is worth full price or 2. Are like me and can't justify buying them at that price. Therefore they really aren't losing too much money on used games cause the people buying them wouldn't buy new anyways. You are being very short sighted.
@Moi_Hahaha You really have no fucking clue how it works, do you?
@Moi_Hahaha you never took a game over your friends house that your friend didn't have so you guys can play together. If they blocked used games then we can't do that. Also I use used games to buy new ones. I sell them on craigslist/ebay or go to gamestop.
@ Moi_Hahaha: The devs don't get the money either way. The publishers do.
@ Loshead: You are right. Except about the part about going to GameStop. GameStop rip you off and they are the reason prices for used games are so high and that publishers want a piece of that rip off money too.
Bottom line, buy new or buy used. It's as you wish. But don't buy from GameStop. You buy a game console, you should be able to own the game you purchased and play it no matter where it came from.
@MegaPhilX2 The price of used games isn't because of Gamestop or any other store for that matter it's because of supply and demand. If people will pay those high of prices why should any company sell them for less?
Blocking second hand games is stupid.
|I mean they not pirated or something, it is the original game I bought from the store, I just lend it to my friend to play it and he will give it back to me, or he could like it and buy another copy for himself, or a game I dont really need and give it to him. I bought it, I own it, is my property now. I didnt crack it, pirate it or did anything illegal with it.
Blocking used games is another way to take our money by force.
A very stupid way.
i loved your comment by the way but what are they saying... are they saying that they aren't going to allow PS3 games to play on PS4 or what..... i am getting confused here.... thank you for your help
@videogamer008 Ye, you wont be able to play your disc PS3 games on your PS4.
I am not sure about them digitally though.
@Flamerdragon You're stupid.
It is absolutely ABSURD that they would stop the used game market, it is complete and utter greed. For a used game to even exist, that means someone ought to have bought it new in the first place right? So what exactly gives them the right to want even more money from the game the second time it gets sold, it's complete GREED. DLC being abused for extra money is one thing, making us PAY for endings? Locked disc DLC? Now this?!!? I'm sorry, but I will WHOLEHEARTEDLY NOT be buying a "next gen" console, I feel fucking insulted on behalf of the ENTIRE gaming community about the way these bastards are acting.
Oh and BTW if you want one company to be held responsible for all of this point your finger at none other than EA. THEY introduced online pass, THEY are pushing digital distribution, which by the way if becomes the new standard and physical games are abolished will destroy the used market entirely, and the thing that's the most disgusting about them is that they try to make it sound like they're doing you a favor, they'll publicly speak of it being a service theyre providing, and they make BILLIONS of dollars in revenue, in complete profit AS IT IS and as it was before this complete farce of events, there's absolutely no warrant for this other than complete and utter greed.
Grow some balls guys, don't buy their shit if you're not happy with what they're giving you, I certainly won't be, because if you do that trust me, it WILL hit home.
A used or 2nd hand game is still a legitimate version, so why is Sony even considering blocking them? It's as if Sony execs and other game developers are treating these used games as pirated copies.
I remember when the PS3 and 360 were rumored to not play used games. the industry keeps recycling rumors. good that sony is combatting that.
In other news regarding PS3 - Slightly off topic...
Blizzard is rumored - well it sounds pretty solid, that on PS3 and PS4 Diablo III will allow "couch co-op" with no spit screen the camera just zooms out to show every character, AND will not require an always online connection to play. Offline play with 4 player co-op, WITH all the latest DLC available/packaged at launch...
Sounds pretty damn good to me. Glad i bought both Xbox and PS3. lol
They ought to play in the background "In for the Kill" from Skrillex while they run the commercial of this...
At what cost I wonder, sure the games will play but perhaps that is it, maybe they lock out trophy support, online play and any extra features until you pony up for whatever the devs are going to be calling online passes by that point.
Heck maybe non of that happens and they just stream 30 second to 1 minute unskippable ads into the title screen to help pay the devs, either way it will be interesting to see what kind of compromise Sony and, eventually, Microsoft will make in this regard.
@Valen_Ca Pay the developers what? lol
They make 10 fold off the game when it initially hits the market... Second hand repurchases should not even be an issue. That should be the thanks to stores like Game Stop and Amazon.com for promoting and carrying their products.
The fact that the don't make any money off second hand games just alludes to greed plain and simple.
If they want a percentage of second hand game sales i'm sure they could work out a deal with Amazon or Gamestop to get a percentage of second hand game/console sales.
"We are going to do the right thing" .... 'For the developers and make them block used games trololololol' Says Sony
Am I the only one who thinks Sony & the Game-Makers should have the right to make *some* money from used games?
They work so hard on the games, and GameStop gives nothing to the Game-Makers from the secondhand market.
@PodXCOM if you somehow whant that to happen, you'll be the one paying for it, why? because if gamestop sells a used game for $20 for example and they know they will now charge you $25 or something like that. their $20 remain intact and you have to pay the extra $5 to that company. you know what I say to that? I say F... it! I'll be buying my used games online then which os what I normaly do anyways. hahaaaaa!
@PodXCOM does BMW, FIAT has any right to money from their second - hand cars? Does any brand or company, of any type of commerce, asks for the right to get money from products they already sold to clients and no longer own, should those clients decide to sell it to someone else? It's ridiculous, and the fact that there's already some people buying into their PR brainwashing campaign to convince us that they have that right and it's fair, shows the direction the industry is going. A decade ago, talks in the industry were about the recognition of videogames as art. Today, talks are about how to increase profits and turning games even more commercial in order to suck more money.
@pspearman Also developers are forcing the online into games as way to sell more DLC.
@pspearman Xbox live gold was supposed to allow you to play online.
@TigusVidiks What about Valve games? You can't resell those, can you?
Bob buying Jim's second hand game, gives Jim some money to buy a new game. Therefore the game makers are getting some return from games being resold. They've already made profit in the first place, they don't need to double dip, imo.
It strikes me as something similar to a particular bank making a solid profit AND laying off staff. Just not needed.
We buy second hand cars, and the manufacturer gets nothing from that sale. Why would games be any different?
@Marshal_Wilhelm well no, because believe it or not, people don't only buy games with money gained from game sales.... in my experience most people are selling there crap because they have debts or to buy drugs... or have drug debts.
@Marshal_Wilhelm totally agree, in other areas of consumerism 2nd hand market its the owner that recieves the profit and not the originator - this is the market & the games market is no different
@Marshal_Wilhelm Cars rusts and break-down. Games don't.
I've seen a lot of good game developers die off, because they couldn't make the bill. Great developers like THQ. If they only had a little more money, they could still be with us.
Content you might like…
Users who looked at this article also looked at these content items.
Avalanche Studios co-founder says developer's ambition is for action, not moments that make players cry; steampunk-style game on hold. Full Story
- Posted May 15, 2013 2:33 pm GMT
4A Games creative director Andrew Prokhorov thanks Jason Rubin for telling the studio's story, but says, "We deserve the ratings we get." Full Story
- Posted May 16, 2013 8:44 pm GMT