Report: PlayStation 3 to cost £425 in UK

UK price of high-end version of Sony's next-gen console may cost $200 more than US counterpart; no-frills 20GB model may not be option in region.

Sony Computer Entertainment UK has confirmed that the retail price of the 60GB PlayStation 3 is currently planned to be £425 ($799) in the UK--although there is still a possibility that this will change before November's launch. SCEUK MD Ray Maguire told industry magazine MCV that the "60GB version looks like £425 in the UK at the moment".

However, there is no guarantee that the cheaper 20GB console will be launched in the UK. "The lower-end 20GB version of PlayStation 3 has no Wi-Fi, no HDMI, and none of the other slots in it, so it's really a question of where we would position it. It's more likely that we will only launch the 60GB version," Maguire told MCV.

A price point of £425 would, at current exchange rates, make the UK console over £100 more expensive than a direct conversion from the $599 US retail cost, and about £10 more than a direct conversion from the European price of 599 euros announced at E3. The 20GB version will retail for $499 in North America.

Online retailer GameStation has closed its preorders for the 60GB console "until Sony are in a position to confirm initial allocation volumes".

The PlayStation 3's chief rival, the premium Xbox 360, currently sells for £279 ($525) in the UK. The same unit costs $399 in the US.

596 Comments

  • TeflonRon

    Posted May 22, 2006 12:23 pm GMT

    "mgsseries4life" ...thanks for the long post.. but no matter what you say.. IT IS PRICED TOO HIGH! They just priced themselves out of the casual gamer market.. plain and simple... no matter how good of a valve teh system is.. People are having a hard time buying gas for their cars and Sony wants them too drop 600+ on a gaming/movie system?? I mean even DVD sales are down, so people aren't even buy that many DVD's... Sony just did a bad gamble..

  • TeflonRon

    Posted May 22, 2006 12:17 pm GMT

    I love sony an all but i feel that sony may have crippled the game industry. I just hope that either sony or the 360 can get a large installment base cause that's crucial for developers to sell their games..

  • chrisdojo

    Posted May 22, 2006 11:52 am GMT

    LOL....nothing like owning yourself sony.

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 22, 2006 11:27 am GMT

    I have seen a lot of complaints as to the cost of the PS3. I think that the following should help you understand why this is not as unreasonable as it seems.
    Let me first discuss the graphics. By this time everyone knows the outputs. PS3 will be outputting true HD (at this time) of 1080p. The Xbox360 isn’t far behind outputting 1080i. Although the screen resolution is the same, essentially the PS3 refreshes it's screen twice as many times a minute (For those that don't know: 1080i is an interlaced screen, "spraying" every other line 60 times a second essentially giving you 30 frames per second, while 1080p is a progressive screen "spraying" every line 60 times a second essentially dicing you 60 frames per second). Now while this difference doesn’t seem all that noticeable the interlaced screen may appear slightly choppy. Now not to rag on the Wii, but it will be outputting 480p, which doesn’t come close to competing with the PS3.
    Now besides the output the systems have different graphics processors, and while I don't know everything about the GPU (Graphic Processing Unit), the major specs I have are that the PS3 has 1.8 TFLOPS floating point performance running at 550MHZ, and the Xbox360 only has 1 TFLOPS and runs at 500MHZ. The PS3 also surpasses the 360 graphics in other ways, and from what I know, they suggest that the PS3 is twice as powerful as the 360. (The Wii has not output specifics as to my knowledge.)
    Moving on quickly to the power of the systems. I know you all are tired of hearing it but its all in the cell. It truly is an amazing piece of technology. It does in everyway surpass what the Xbox360 and the Wii have to offer.
    Now, onto the subject of blu-ray. The blu-ray disc format does so much for the PS3. It not only provides more space to the developers for added game content, it alows for less data compression, and faster streaming rates, thus lowering loading times. Also the addition of the blu-ray player provides consumers with a low priced fully functioning blu-ray player which will share, if not control the home movie media market (HD-DVD may also catch on). Of course the PS3 will include a DVD player, so there really is no worry if HD-DVD catches on. Of course if blu-ray does catch on the technology will become easier and easier to produce and production prices will go down, and we could see a reduction in game prices due to less material costs of the disks.
    Why should you upgrade from DVD to Blu-ray?
    The simple answer is HDTV. If you've ever seen high-definition (HD) video on an HDTV, then you know just how incredibly sharp the picture is and how vivid the colors are. In fact, HD offers five times the amount of detail compared to standard-definition (SD). The problem with today's DVDs is that they only support SD and don't have the necessary storage capacity to satisfy the needs of HD. That's where Blu-ray comes in, it offers up to 50GB of storage capacity and enables playback, recording and rewriting of HD in all of the HD resolutions including 1080p. The format also supports high-definition audio formats and lossless audio.

    In addition to the greater video and audio quality, the extra storage capacity also means there will be plenty of room for additional content and special features. This combined with the new BD-J interactivity layer adopted by Blu-ray will bring the menus, graphics and special features to a whole new level. For example, you will be able to bring up the menu system as an overlay without stopping the movie, and you could have the director of the movie on the screen explaining the shooting of a scene while the scene is playing in the background. The advanced interactivity combined with the networking features of Blu-ray will also allow content producers to support new innovative features such as downloading extras, updating content via the web, and watching live broadcasts of special events.

    Thanks to the greatly enhanced HD video and audio quality as well as the advanced interactivity and networking features, Blu-ray represents a huge leap forward in the DVD viewing experience and will offer consumers an unprecedented HD experience.
    What benefits does Blu-ray offer compared to HD-DVD?
    Although both Blu-ray and HD-DVD are similar in many aspects, there are some important differences between them.

    The first is capacity. Because Blu-ray utilizes a lens with a greater numerical aperture (NA) than HD-DVD, the laser spot can be focused with greater precision to fit more data on the same size disc. This allows Blu-ray to hold 25GB per layer (50GB on a dual-layer disc), whereas HD-DVD can only hold 15GB per layer (30GB on a dual-layer disc). Blu-ray has also adopted a higher data transfer rate for video and audio (54Mbps vs 36.55Mbps). The greater capacity and data transfer rates for Blu-ray will allow the movie studios to release their movies with higher quality video and audio than the HD-DVD format.

    The second is content. The Blu-ray format has received broad support from the major movie studios as a successor to today's DVD format. Seven of the eight major movie studios (Warner, Paramount, Fox, Disney, Sony, MGM and Lionsgate) have already announced titles for Blu-ray, whereas HD-DVD only has support from three major movie studios (Warner, Paramount and Universal). This is an important difference because some of the studios might only support one of the formats, so you won't be able to get your favorite movies in the other format. Choosing the format with the most content support minimizes this risk.

    The third is hardware support. The Blu-ray format has broad support from the world's leading consumer electronics, personal computer and media manufacturers, including Sony, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Pioneer, Sharp, JVC, Hitachi, Mitsubishi, TDK, Thomson, LG, Apple, HP and Dell. The Blu-ray format will also be supported in the next-generation PlayStation 3 (PS3) video game console. This means that you will have a lot of choice when it comes to players and hardware. The HD-DVD format has far less supporters, so the amount of players and hardware will be very limited. So far, Toshiba is the only company to officially announce a HD-DVD player and it will only support 1080i output, while the announced Blu-ray players will support 1080p.
    You'll receive the most powerful gaming system (Cell based processor) with the LARGEST gaming library in the world (backwards compatible with PS2 and PS1 games). 162 Games already announced for the PS3 include: Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, Final Fantasy XIII, Killzone PS3, Resident Evil 5, GTA4, Devil May Cry 4, Resistance Fall Of Man, Naughty Dog project, 8 Day (which look amazing probably the next GTA), The Getaway, Grand Tourismo, Tekken 6, Heavenly sword, Virtua Fighters 5, Warhawk(look amazing specially with the new motion sensor thing), Coded Arms: Assault, SingStar, Unreal Tournament 2007, Haze, Ridge Racer 7, BioShock, Call of Duty 3, Virtua Tennis 3, Possession, Dark Sector, Stuntman 2, WinningEleven 2007 and Assassin’s Creed.
    Further arguments in favor of the PS3 include: Built-in WiFi, free online features (which include video chat, and downloadable content), HDMI output, full backwards-compatibility, firmware updates, linux based OS (Operating System), and more.
    Also Sony Computer Entertainment America reportedly stated that gaming would be free, stating: "Please note that online gaming will be free right out of the box."
    Sony has touted free online as an advantage over Microsoft's free XBox LIVE account, called a "Silver" account, which does not include online gaming as one of its services. The pricing structure for premium and downloadable content has still not been outlined
    Finally in response to a previous "review" the reason of the "low" quality game content at E3 was that most games weren't more than 50% complete, and were not outputting true high-def. Also at this time games only are using about 20% of the cell processor (so I read), and it will take awhile for developers to get used to the system and its capabilities. I expect that in the future games will become much better.
    As a quick side note I would like to mention that the PS3 is reportedly to be extremely silent, compared to the 360 which is extremely noisy.
    Still it is a matter of opinion, and this is only mine. The PS3 is not only a game machine, it is a multimedia device. Compared to the price of normal blu-ray players, which will most likely be priced in the thousands, a fully functional one will be within the PS3 for only $600.
    All the facts that I said are true since I got them from Google and other sure sources. Hope I helped to clear a few things up, or to pursue some that were on the fence. Personally I cannot wait to get my hands on a PS3.

  • tom1302

    Posted May 22, 2006 11:14 am GMT

    Wohoo thanks sony *sticks finger up*

  • linegrinds

    Posted May 22, 2006 10:59 am GMT

    800 bucks? wow sucks for people in the UK

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 22, 2006 10:38 am GMT

    Look at this:

    The Playstation 3 Value Proposition
    The console may be expensive - but it's not overpriced.
    By Carl Bender - May 21, 2006

    Out of all the announcements Sony made during their pre-E3 conference two weeks ago, probably none has resonated more loudly than the announcement of the price for the upcoming console. Starting at $500 the system is not cheap, and even longtime Sony loyalists are waking up to the fact that when November rolls around this year, there will be decidedly less expensive alternatives to consider should half a grand seem a little too rich for their blood.

    But now that the dust has begun to settle and people are starting to get over the initial shock of the announcement, it's time to look a little more closely at what exactly Sony is offering the consumer for the price being asked.

    We'll start with the base console.

    Called 'crippled' by many, the truth is the base model can be considered crippled only when compared to its more expensive sibling. When compared to its nearest rival on the other hand - the premium XBox 360 - the basic Playstation 3 matches it feature for feature... and then goes farther.

    The most obvious addition over the XBox 360 is of course the Blu-ray drive. The favored next-generation optical format among the majority of movie studios, it's inclusion in the Playstation for a $100 premium grants the consumer a feature that would otherwise cost roughly a thousand dollars to obtain via a standalone player. In addition, the PS3 supports DTS audio for the audiophiles out there (not to mention SACD), whereas the XBox 360 is limited to Dolby.

    Lack of HDMI and the possible use of ICT-flagging on next-gen media does, however, remain a cloud over the BD playback capabilities of the base PS3. On any Blu-ray films that were to utilize ICT, output would be limited to a 960x540 image (DVD is 720x480) instead of Blu-ray's potential maximum of 1920x1080. At the moment though, no film studio has announced an intent to use ICT-flagging in their shipped products. In fact, Sony has already come out as saying they will not use ICT on their own Blu-ray video releases (Sony owns Columbia, MGM, and Sony Pictures). If other studios follow Sony's example, then for the next several years there would be very little shortfall in owning a component-equipped PS3 vs an HDMI-capable unit.

    Over on the gaming side of things, the promise of an online network emulating many of Live Golds key features - while at the same time remaining free from a service charge - will present consumers with the opportunity to save the $50 per year charged by Microsoft for subscription-based Gold service. For those who game online, this savings alone would pay for the price difference between the two consoles after just two years; calculated five years out, this would actually provide a savings relative to the premium 360 of $150. And with a hard drive present on all SKUs, the Playstation 3 allows developers the freedom to build games around the hard drive and with the hard drive in mind. Though still useful on the 360, the requirement that all games shipped for the system work on non-HDD equipped systems puts a limit on the maximum potential of the 360 hard drive in a gaming environment.

    When moving up to the Playstation 3 'luxury' edition, for the additional price of an XBox 360 WiFi adaptor or an extra 20GB hard drive, owners of the upgraded Playstation gain not only high-speed wireless, but a tripling of the hard drive size, a multi-format card reader, and the next-generation of HDMI interface. Superior to the HDMI solutions available today, HDMI 1.3 will raise the color information carried per channel to 16 bits from the present 12 bits, and allow audio to be carried via the HDMI cable as well. A compatible HDTV set will be required to make full use of this added functionality though, and for a lot of people this will essentially render HDMI 1.3 no more or less attractive than HDMI 1.2 for the next several years. Still, on a high-end A/V device, forward-compatability is always appreciated.

    In the end, the launch price of the Playstation 3 puts the system out of the reach of many consumers that might otherwise desire one. Luckily for Sony, this does not look like it will greatly effect the demand for the console during the launch window itself. After that period, it will be up to Sony to take advantage of falling processor and Blu-ray component costs to drop the price of the console as rapidly as possible for the benefit of the mainstream consumer.

    For those that can afford a Playstation 3 at launch, however, the system represents a compelling value across a number of fronts. On top of that, when factoring in certain accessory prices and possible online gaming fees, in several scenarios the PS3 may actually come out ahead in total cost of ownership relative to the XBox 360.

    For the capabilities offered in the PS3, the word "overpriced" is certainly misused when applied to it.

  • 9w43

    Posted May 22, 2006 10:16 am GMT

    you have to get a HD player anyway in the next few years, i think sony is doing the right thing.

  • Thee_Chigga

    Posted May 22, 2006 10:13 am GMT

    omfg...this is insane, how could Sony do this to their fans?! Sigh...The only thing Sony is out to prove is how expensive is expensive for a console, was gonna pick up a PS3 at launch, but at this price...I'll gladly wait for a price drop. I'm hoping M$ gives Sony a hard time by dropping the x360's pricetag forcing Sony to do likewise

  • TheTrooperUK

    Posted May 22, 2006 10:10 am GMT

    Uk people are complaining because we understand when something is overpriced.....granted you are getting a BLUE RAY player.......but this is not the reasone why I and many others wanted a PS3.

    I buy consoles because i love games....i have been playing games for many years.....i am not in the least bit intrested in the blue ray inclusion.

    The fact that a company that entered the market with a product that was initialy manufactured for gaming....and now uses it to FORCE its new storage format upon us gamers.....(yes gamers not techheads) is seriously unfair on their part.

    I think that instead of ripping us off with a terribly poor less expensive version of this console is down right offensive....when all they had to do was release the blue ray drive as an add on.......which would have just made whole lot more sense.......dont get me wrong i know perfectly well why they went down this route as do all of you still reading this.

    Oh well until this crazy priced console comes down dramaticaly in price i will pass on to other more fairly and consumer aware orientated GAMING consoles that are just as good & could just be in line to kick the crown from greedy opposition that have lost their way (it seems)....THESE ARE GAMING CONSOLES PEOPLE........remember what that used to be.

    Cheers

  • paulyfknt

    Posted May 22, 2006 9:38 am GMT

    i dont know why the uk people are complaining, its the same price that we're paying...

    i mean yes its alot of money for most of you but quit complaining and dont buy the system if you feel that way. if ur a fan of sony and realy want the system than get it.

    stop complainig about the high price. it is what it is so we all have to deal with it. not to be mean but its the truth

  • marojado

    Posted May 22, 2006 9:21 am GMT

    ha, look on the brightside, at least they didn't do the whole dollars to pounds thing again, that would have been stupid... £600's worth of stupid *rolls eyes*

  • Saint_Longinus

    Posted May 22, 2006 9:11 am GMT

    ouch!! i would hate to be living in the uk.

  • japanesegoth

    Posted May 22, 2006 9:02 am GMT

    plus...there's the fact that sony has a track record of producing products of less than acceptable quality...you know...all the disc read errors. yet another reason not to buy it til it's cheap which probably won't be until ps4 is released.

  • tharealdeal20xx

    Posted May 22, 2006 8:25 am GMT

    This is sick... I will never get a PS3 until it is 199. I refuse to pay that and all other Americans should do the same. Unless you want Sony to be your pimp I say hold off for some time. I bought the PSP first day cuz it is basically a handheld PS2 and worth every dime. I can get a Wii and 360 fot the price of PS3. Sick Sick Sick.

  • Kwiksilva

    Posted May 22, 2006 8:09 am GMT

    Ps3 is gunna crash in the UK

  • RavensFall

    Posted May 22, 2006 7:45 am GMT

    jeez its all a bit heated in here isnt?! relax guys its all video games ffs, big kids playthings.its gonna be 425 quid over here it may turn out to be the best thing since phish food ice cream but as it stands right now its a hell of a lot of money for something that is not looking a whole lot more than the 360.like i said before ill buy one when the yummy looking MGS4 touches down over here till then im gonna sit and watch people fight about it.

  • mrmagoo2

    Posted May 22, 2006 7:13 am GMT

    Good post silentshark,although, i would say using ps3 as a trojan horse for blue ray might not be the best thing for consumers as we dont know who will win the format wars yet.(im rooting for hd personally ,the extra cost of br is not worth it imao).As for the price,im gonna love hearing sony try to spin this one.

  • TheSilentShark

    Posted May 22, 2006 6:42 am GMT

    Wow, this topic has decended into chaos!

    I've just read all the posts, and for anyone who cares, here's what I think:

    There's quite a few people saying that there are very few 1080p TVs around. Well yes, there arn't now, but there will be in the future. HDTV is only just beginning in the UK, and has barely begun in the US either. It'll pick up after the world cup.

    The argument that £425 is a good price for all that tech is probably true, but it's still too much for a games console, which is what it is. No matter how much tech they cram in, it's still a games console, and there are many who will find the price too high.

    And the argument that the PS3 is more powerful than than the 360 and will have better graphics is not true. The PS3 is more powerful, but the graphics will not look better. The power means that you can have more going on at once (i.e. more explosions at the same time), but they won't look any better than the 360. The power also allows the 1080p, which won't really make much difference. I've seen stuff at 720p and 1080p, and it's virtually impossible to see the difference (on a normal sized screen anyway).

    Blu-ray is unproven? What does that actually mean? BR hasn't been decided as the no.1 choice for HD films, but neither has HD-DVD. Sony are pushing to get BR into our homes with PS3 because many peoples first DVD players were PS2s (I know mine was), and they are hoping for a repeat of this, so that BR (which I believe is the superior format anyway) gets that no.1 spot. Nothing wrong with that, it's good business sense.

    And PS3s launch lineup isn't that strong. There's only one, maybe 2 games that vaguely interest me on that list posted earlier.

    This topic is supposed to be about the £425 price. I did a quick calculation. If $600 is the price in USD, converted at current exchange rates it's £320. Add VAT (tax) to that, and it goes to £376. Why on earth is it £425 then??

  • TheTrooperUK

    Posted May 22, 2006 6:13 am GMT

    Ok let me just get my word in here.......i have just read that very long post on page 51 from MGSSERIES....bla bla bla.

    Firstly I would have to say that it worries me that there are people like yourself that go to such lengths to push a product.....a product that you
    obiviously love yet dont profit from it (financialy that is) unless you are employed by SONY ENTERTAINMENT LTD.

    I would just like to mention that i think the PS3 looks to be a great console....HOWEVER i see no point in spending that amount on a console that seems no better than the one i currently own.....a XB360.

    I love all the specs you (freakishly) typed out for all to read......HOWEVER
    I also noticed that you failed to mention that this is a console that has not been released on the market yet - NOT TO MENTION that the PS3 as a product (that offers all this wonderfull BLUE RAY and 1080p) is an unproven quantity.....(from a new technology prospective).

    Oh well thats my opinion so.....bite me

    Cheers

  • R1PP3R

    Posted May 22, 2006 4:35 am GMT

    EXCUSE ME BUT IM SICK OF THIS BULL****!! I READ EARLIER, SOME GUY RECKONS THAT US "british are richer than americans" HOW THE HELL CAN YOU SAY THAT?? PERHAPS IF YOU AND YOUR IGNORANT LITTLE MIND CAME OVER HERE YOU WOULD SEE THAT WE QUITE CLEARLY HAVE THE SAME FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AS AMERICANS...NOT ONLY THAT BUT WE HAVE TO PAY TAX AS WELL YOU F***ING IDIOT!! THE FACT THAT WE HAVE TO PAY £100 MORE IS SIMPLY APPALLING MARKETING ON BEHALF OF THE WHOLE GAMING WORLD.

  • granposho

    Posted May 22, 2006 4:22 am GMT

    Man... that's a lot of sales lost... do they really think they can toy around like that? I don't care about the 20 gb version, but I do care about the 60GB version, and for that much cash... I'll just wait for a price drop, right now I'm way too happy with my 360

  • Sociologist

    Posted May 22, 2006 3:31 am GMT

    mgsseries4life, you are a riot. If you're telling the truth, then you are a credit to bra burning feminists everywhere! Show us all your love for corporate America (and particularly Sony) on your day off from work. Oh, and by the way, posing in a smut pr0n magazine doesn't count as a 'beauty' magazine.

    Anyway, I digress... Tell me what you list for your interests along side pics of you in your 'beauty' poses? lmao, you are such a typical fanboy. And yes, I know that you are a male, regardless of what you say. Nice try, though.

  • chaos3259

    Posted May 22, 2006 3:27 am GMT

    This is just shocking,for the same price i could buy a wii and an x-box 360,with money left over for games

  • ShadedIllusions

    Posted May 22, 2006 2:55 am GMT

    Night night sony.

  • jonajacket

    Posted May 22, 2006 2:38 am GMT

    Monopoly is the exclusive control by one group of the means of producing or selling a commodity or service - this is only in theory - in the eyes of the law a monopoly is a company that controls over 25% of the market.

    However it can be argued that the videogames hardware market is an oligopoly with fierce competition.

    By the way mgsseries4life, please chill, can't you see you are being led on and are providing quite a funny drama for everybody? If you're not sure what I mean do some translating into whichever language you prefer.

  • Newnab

    Posted May 22, 2006 2:11 am GMT

    HDDVD add on for 360 isn't a requirement. They aren't FORCING us to buy it, thats the differance.

    Also, you dont need a remote to play DVD's on the 360, though you did with the original Xbox.

    And you dont need to have wireless. And even if you did, it didnt need to be THEIR official wireless.

    Microsoft is giving us options. PS3 is shovelling expensive crap down your throat.

  • puppiemaster

    Posted May 22, 2006 1:29 am GMT

    didnt think that blu-ray supported HD-DVD, dont want the addons, just want to play games, didnt buy a PS2 to watch DVD's either, bought a proper DVD player.

    dont need a wireless network as i have connections next to the consoles.

    all this in fighting, think I'll just buy the nintendo and play legand of zelda 1.

    and wait till 2007 and get an XBox 360 to play GTA and Halo 3.
    When they drop the price.

    still playing Rise of Legends, Oblivion and Star Wars Empire at war on my comp and waiting for Vice city stories for my PSP

  • Vegnar

    Posted May 22, 2006 1:17 am GMT

    Let's see:


    XBOX 360 $400 (20gb)
    Wireless Adapter $100
    Play and Charge kit $20
    HD-DVD addon $150
    Remote $30 (to watch DVD's lol)

    = $700 and you still only get 20gb HD and no true 1080p support.

    PS3 $599

    Wireless
    Blue-Ray and HD-DVD out of the box
    No need to buy charge kit (usb cable charges your controller)
    60 GB hard drive

    So again if you decide to go with the best setup with the XBOX (Wireless,HD-DVD addon,etc) how is the PS3 more expensive when you potentially will spend the same if not more?

    P.S. Addon on systems look ugly, no one likes them...

    Fanboyism at it's best. Stop trashing both companies , if you like XBox buy it , if you like Sony get a PS3, if you are a gamer get them all.

    PC gaming still rules.

  • puppiemaster

    Posted May 22, 2006 12:53 am GMT

    still think its over priced and economics wise if no one buys it the price will go down, Sony will take a larger hit on the hardware to get it into homes and up the price of the software.

    I'm still waiting to hear if the blu-ray discs get coded to the individual machine, so you cant swap or buy second hand games, now that really would be the ultimate killer..

  • KoruKinshi

    Posted May 21, 2006 11:03 pm GMT

    Again...

    **** pants!!! Wear Sony!

    Their favorite motto.

  • enoslives7

    Posted May 21, 2006 10:12 pm GMT

    It wont matter in the end. Sony will own microsoft and nintendo as always !

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:52 pm GMT

    Are u saying that girls can’t be aggressive? Then ur alot less intelegent than I thought. We can beat guys in video games. and for " low self-esteem, and a general inferiority complex ", do u really think that everybody is like u? Don't even dream of my pic but lets say that i'm far of being an average woman since I pose for a beauty magazine. I’m on vacation from my work and thought it would be good if I show people how M$ ripped me off with their 360.( sorry for all those posts, i had a problem with my PC)

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:52 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • Silent_X

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:51 pm GMT

    Looking at your post Mgssseries4life for the PS3 launch titles, you do know that over 3 quarters of those games are also coming to the Xbox 360 right....?

    I'm out of here I need some sleep.

    See ya.

  • Silent_X

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:50 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:49 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:44 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:42 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:39 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:38 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:37 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:34 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:33 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:33 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • Silent_X

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:28 pm GMT

    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

  • Sociologist

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:24 pm GMT

    Oh, and I hope that you were able to read the last post before a mod deletes it, MGSseries, because everyone with half an ounce of intelligence can see you for what you are.

  • Sociologist

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:23 pm GMT

    That's a lie, because of your demeanor. You're very aggressive, have a poor temper, low self-esteem, and a general inferiority complex which you try to compensate for by picking frivolous fights with strangers online... which is odd since you claim that you are not a naturalized citizen, lol. Unless you have a chemical imbalance in your brain or are just very butch and overweight, there is NO way that you are a female. I hope Sony is paying you a handsome salary... ;-) Good Night, sweet dreams.

  • Silent_X

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:20 pm GMT

    Hmmm, I'm sure I've seen a post like that before? Again just information msgsseries4life, nothing solid. As I said let's wait until the machines been released, then the noise, the power, the winning Blu-ray and the over the top graphics show there face, then I'll think about getting one. But right now, it's nothing more than vapour ware.

  • mgsseries4life

    Posted May 21, 2006 9:18 pm GMT

    I'm a girl u idiot.

advertisement
Click Here

Hot Stories

Newsmakers

Featured Stories

Tags

Submit News

Got tips? Send them in!