Flash Player 9 is required to watch this video.

Watch this video in HD 540p

You're watching our standard resolution format (up to 480x360). Click to watch this video in 540p resolution (960x540). 540p is available for all users.

106 Comments

  • benbrooky13

    Posted Oct 29, 2009 2:35 pm GMT

    I swear this guy is terrible in every review. I think Heavenly Sword was the only decent review he had.

  • CyleM

    Posted Oct 20, 2009 10:26 am GMT

    I need to get this...

  • mridulmaiden

    Posted Oct 19, 2009 6:51 am GMT

    it should get a 10m not 7.5 tis reviewer suks

  • Solidsnake13_2

    Posted Oct 17, 2009 5:46 am GMT

    That had to be like the worst review ever, this game should've been like at 8.9 or even a 9. Too underrated for such a great game, to a great Franchise

  • scorpgul

    Posted Oct 16, 2009 2:03 pm GMT

    deserves a 10 tbh

  • jpfondeur

    Posted Oct 14, 2009 3:34 pm GMT

    Ah, if only this game really had that midnight brown soundtrack, it would be the best game EVER!!!

  • Chronikas

    Posted Oct 14, 2009 10:11 am GMT

    Yeah, I'm about to pick this up so I can play through it before Crack in Time. In the video I really didn't see many mechanics that weren't in the older games. I loved the older games so I'm sure there is plenty to like about this one.

  • diddlesps3

    Posted Oct 12, 2009 1:14 pm GMT

    Kitchen sink-style gameplay???? What be this?

  • scarface_dm

    Posted Oct 8, 2009 10:27 am GMT

    I think the score is just about right on

  • Revolution316

    Posted Oct 6, 2009 6:43 pm GMT

    worst reviewer ever.......way underrated. reviewer should get fired. average score is 8.9. review is flawed

  • pursuit_master

    Posted Oct 6, 2009 3:46 pm GMT

    underrated

  • stu_gamer

    Posted Oct 4, 2009 4:58 pm GMT

    lol this dudes an idiot. This game deserves way more than a 7.5 and whats all that bs about it having too many gameplay mechanics? Thats one of the main reasons this game is so good. Shooting dudes and collecting stuff is awesome but in can get repetetive after a while. Its nice to see that the developer didnt just think "Im going to copy ever other game in this genre". The many gameplay mechanics makes this a unique and fresh experience in a fairly old franchise.

  • Hamitay

    Posted Oct 4, 2009 1:40 pm GMT

    So he didnt liked the game because its has variety?

  • brickdoctor

    Posted Oct 4, 2009 10:38 am GMT

    7.5? This game is a lot better than that! Hopefully they find a different reviewer for a Crack in Time!

  • gabor_sama

    Posted Sep 23, 2009 8:31 am GMT

    I just bought this game along with Quest for Booty and just wow, these games are so much fun, pity I never played the PS2 ones!

  • chedder221

    Posted Sep 21, 2009 3:46 pm GMT

    I'm still going to get this game

  • pursuit_master

    Posted Sep 20, 2009 7:32 am GMT

    idenity crisi?lyer lyer PLANTS for hire!!!!!!!!!!

  • Phantom5bad

    Posted Sep 18, 2009 7:56 pm GMT

    Haha, looking at all the comments it's clear you all don't like this review. R&C is my favorite series ever. So when I saw that GS gave it 7.5 I was shocked. Then I saw this review, and this guy is a clear R&C hater. Next time GS, don't get a game hater to review a game.

  • Screwmefree

    Posted Sep 13, 2009 12:31 pm GMT

    Ha, I just beat this game, and I wondered why the hell GS would give it such a low rating. Judging by the comments, the reviewer is the one giving the rating. Dude definitely isn't consistent.

  • mrbo69jangles

    Posted Sep 13, 2009 8:33 am GMT

    Worst review ever!

  • beepyou34

    Posted Sep 12, 2009 5:45 am GMT

    I hope A Crack in Time gets a better review than this one did.

  • Bioshockraptor

    Posted Sep 7, 2009 8:46 pm GMT

    First PS3 game.

  • Hancock495

    Posted Sep 4, 2009 5:58 pm GMT

    I don't get this reviewer i mean he says so many good things about a game then gives it a low rating.

  • viper_blade

    Posted Aug 24, 2009 2:01 pm GMT

    this game rocks! its easy at times, but not enought to notice. seriously, get some better reviewers!!

  • hamzah1235

    Posted Aug 23, 2009 9:39 am GMT

    this was a bad review, this game deserves at the least a 9, im glad this reviewer is gone

  • ps3gamer1234

    Posted Aug 23, 2009 9:15 am GMT

    Its a great game. The graphics are great.

  • 2deluxe

    Posted Aug 16, 2009 6:35 am GMT

    What is a kitchen sink style gameplay? I have no clue but it must relate to Aaron Thomas' constant need for too much food.

  • jakethesnake159

    Posted Aug 15, 2009 11:27 am GMT

    this game is alsome.

  • navid300

    Posted Aug 11, 2009 10:11 pm GMT

    wow ign gave it a 9.5 sometimes gamespot can suck

  • matt_teh_gamuh

    Posted Aug 10, 2009 4:42 pm GMT

    whoa whoa whoa! im srry for so many comments but what is a kitchen sink style gameplay!?!?!?

  • matt_teh_gamuh

    Posted Aug 10, 2009 4:41 pm GMT

    and this guy is a horrible actor xD

  • matt_teh_gamuh

    Posted Aug 10, 2009 4:39 pm GMT

    what i dont get is, why doesnt ratchet keep the guns from previous games, he should just whip out the dual raptors v100 lol

  • mikey1611

    Posted Aug 4, 2009 6:22 pm GMT

    I just realized how good the sync is between the voice and the mouth movements. Guessed I enjoyed this game too much to notice

  • mgkennedy5

    Posted Jul 31, 2009 6:27 pm GMT

    Why 7.5? Your review made it sound like you liked it more than that...

  • Jak_Napier

    Posted Jul 29, 2009 4:05 pm GMT

    amazing game and a great PS3 exclusive title for every PS3 to have in their collection.

  • campzor

    Posted Jul 24, 2009 12:59 am GMT

    "Why dont we just add spaceships and rails too" Has this guy even played the old ratchet and clanks? HOpe he gets fired.

  • WWE4lyfe123

    Posted Jul 23, 2009 2:54 pm GMT

    game deserves at least a 9, but not a 7.5

    this game is awesome i give it a 9.5

  • Ikouze

    Posted Jul 14, 2009 1:37 pm GMT

    What the hell is wrong with this guy he gives this game a 7.5? It needs at least a 9! This guy can't review. How can you say that a game has to much to do? It's called variety. Not going around blowing up the same enemies over and over again. This guy sucks as a reviewer.

  • oosagie810

    Posted Jul 13, 2009 3:29 pm GMT

    IGN- 9.4
    GameTrailers- 9.0
    Gamespot- 7.5???

    By the way this guy is such a bad reviewer. Too much stuff to do in a game? and that's a bad thing? the reason a game should have "too much stuff to do" is to keep the game from being repetitive. And complaining about a cliffhanger? Assassins Creed had a cliffhanger and you guys loved the game. Seriously this guy is a moron.

  • Blabadon

    Posted Jul 10, 2009 3:04 pm GMT

    what a horrible review trust ign instead
    mario galaxy had different gameplay and they gave that a great score
    only agree with him on few things
    great graphics
    like a movie
    kinda easy
    SO MUCH BETTER THAN GALAXY!!!!!!!!

  • TurtlePerson2

    Posted Jul 8, 2009 3:32 pm GMT

    I just finished it and I think that everything the reviewer says is true, but the number is a bit unfair considering that none of the mini-games really detract from the experience. None of the mini-games were overused and none of them were boring.

  • chaor52

    Posted Jul 5, 2009 7:09 pm GMT

    one of my favorite games i've beaten it like 8 or 9 times

  • reyace

    Posted Jun 30, 2009 3:26 pm GMT

    its looks alright

  • Imakuleus

    Posted Jun 29, 2009 7:09 pm GMT

    I just picked it up, it's a greatest hit alright

  • CanOfPie

    Posted Jun 29, 2009 6:10 pm GMT

    But seriously, this deserved an 8.5 at the very least.
    gamespot has more critics than any othergame reviewing sites ive ever seen

  • CanOfPie

    Posted Jun 29, 2009 6:01 pm GMT

    1. You lack expression!!
    2. I love the fact that he gives away that the ending is a cliffhanger.
    3. Overrall, bad review.

    I give Tools of Destruction an 8.5 I give this review a 6.0

  • trim9001

    Posted Jun 28, 2009 3:16 am GMT

    well I think that the score they gave was way too low but 9 is way too high

    the game is good...compared to the other ones... its much better....the only real thing that i found that drops the game's value is the oline mode which i don't know y they removied... on the ps2 i dind't have online as i dind't install the expansion pack but i always wanted to play online... the PSP version did it really badly.... sucks that they don't have ANY multiplayer at all....

    i think the game is about an 8

  • Noss1

    Posted Jun 19, 2009 1:08 pm GMT

    thanks for ruining the ending for me aaron.

  • Icy-I05

    Posted Jun 16, 2009 8:41 am GMT

    Wow........this game should have defintely gotten a 9.4 Thats why i trust ign's reviews all the time. This game is that deal

  • TylerAlan

    Posted Jun 4, 2009 2:45 pm GMT

    I don't know what the hell this guys talking about. Ratchet and Clank are the best!!!!!!!

Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction Video Review 1

  • Posted Oct 24, 2007
  • 108,394 Views

Aaron Thomas reviews the newest addition to the Ratchet & Clank series.

Download

HD Windows Media
258.8MB
Sign In
Hi-Res H.264 MP4
70.5MB
Download
Lo-Res MPEG
60.3MB
Download
Lo-Res IPOD / PSP
14.8MB
Download

Choose your preferred download format:

HD Windows Media
258.8MB
Sign In
Hi-Res H.264 MP4
70.5MB
Download
Lo-Res MPEG
60.3MB
Download
Lo-Res IPOD / PSP
14.8MB
Download

Use these links to add the GameSpot player to another site (html) or your GameSpot blog (bbcode).

  • BBCODE:

  • HTML:

Upload Your Own Videos

Watch cool and crazy videos from GameSpot users just like you, and vote for your favorites! Subscribers and users level 10 and higher get to upload their own.

Game Stats

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games