- DR-ZMBK
- Rank: Radiant Silvergun
- Member since: Oct 10, 2009
- Last online: 05/20/13 4:33 pm PT
My Friends
-
Travo_basic online
-
siLVURcross online
-
david_lck online
-
VintAge68 online
-
super_mario_128 online
-
wonzan online
-
Crunchy_Nuts online
-
Gaming-Planet online
-
OldKye online
-
LegatoSkyheart online
Hi everyone,
I decided to write more about underrated games. To my surprise, the topic got attention and got great responses. I never thought that a list of underrated games would get this big.
Today, I am going to use the word "under-appreciated". As many gamespot users pointed out, for a game to get a 6 out of 10 is not that bad. It is still considered above average.
So what about games that deserved a 10, 9.5, or a 9 out of 10. What about games that made a change in the gaming industry. What about games that introduced new ideas, whether in the story, in the game design, or game mechanics. What about games that provide us (gamers) with a long compelling journey instead of 5 hour campaigns. What about games that give so much attention to details whether artistic, or technologic. What about games that introduce something new with every new release. I could go on, but will stop here before you get bored if not already.
We gamers want games that leave us speechless, we want games to remember, we want games to collect and replay again and again and again. Unfortunately, all this joy can be missed because of a review. A review that focused on minor negative aspects of a game and left the huge positive achievement the had made.
It is wrong to take points from a game because you disliked a voice of a character, disliked how a character walks, dislikedthe length ofthe game , disliked its difficulty level, or disliked how it was similar to another game. Am I wrong here, or are review about taste.
I can't see how reviews would depend on taste, since we all look at thing differently. Review should be about what the game achieved and the game had not period. If you are confused, bare with me. I will list games that I think are severly under-appreciated and will give a reason for each game. Games are listed alphabetically:
1- Assassin'sCreed Revelations (was under-appreciated because of the gild defense missions and Desmond's memory fragments). Are you kidding me, the game introducedsomething new, you don't have to like it. There are games out there that repeat the same formula again and again and again and again. Still they get at least a 9, looking at you COD.
2- Battlefield 3 (was under-appreciated because it was compared to a COD campaign). Okay, maybe they are wright, but lets not forget that the game introduced a new engine (Frostbite2). This a big deal, a new engine that will be used in gamesfor years to come. Isn't that enough to impressyou?
3- Crysis 2 (was under-appreciated because of the enemy AI "Artificial Intelligence"0. I don't know where to start. This was the first third party game tobe provided in 3D. The game used an entirely new engine. Thegame looks wonderful. The gameplay options you have arebrilliant, you can playstealthly or blast your way in.
4-Heavy Rain (was under-appreciated because it felt like an interactive movie). At least it was a new idea and was done perfectly. Just want to mention that the story is one of the best you would ever encounter.
5- inFAMOUS 2 (was under-appreciated because it was similar to the first installment). It is a sequel, it has to be similar. The game improvedin graphics, story and gameplay.
6- Need for speed the run (was under-appreciated because of the quick action sequences). Now that's stupid. It is a new feature, you don't have to like it. At least I did. The game used a new engine (Frostbite 2) isn't that enough?
7- Rage (was under-appreciated becausethe world to explore wasn't big enough, and the multiplayer was only racing). Okay, this is not a fallout game, nor it is Call of Duty. The game looks gorgeous, gunplay is amazing, and it used a new engine.
8- Vanquish (was under-appreciated because it was too short). Okay, so other shooters are 15 hours long? The game is a technical blast. Shootinghasn't been that fun in years. Shooting in slow motion is amazing. Sliding and boostingfrom cover to coveris a brilliant idea.
See what I mean? I could go on and on, but the blog has been long enough. What I meant to say Today is that there are many games out there that deserve to be appreciated, not neglectedbecause of minor dislikes. I only mentioned 8 games, and I am sure there are many more.
Do you have any under-appreciated games in mind? if yes, which are they? and why?
Did you have any thought about the games above? if yes, please share them with us.
Should I write more about underrated "under-appreciated games"? or should I move to the new subject (overrated games)?
Thank you very much for reading.
Peace!



