Misogynist, check... Homophobic, check.
This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.
- Jan 30, 2013 6:58 am GMTkayoticdreamz posted...
spikefreaky posted...
Go and ***** yourself having come from a home where domestic violence was the norm I'm glad WWE don't endorse it, stop being so f****** selfish and actually think about what it would be saying is ok.
benevolent sexism look it up. essentially people treat one sex as great while condemning. in this case we tell ourselves it is good that men can't hit women while at the same time saying women and men are not equal and do not deserve equal rights. it is the same as saying you love your wife while saying she damn sure better stay in the kitchen or else.
so in all honesty you are the sexist one. and this mentality often breeds domestic violence because once again women are not allowed to step outside their roles but since the door is opened for them and they are treated "good" no one complains and calls everyone else the sexist which is ironic given they are the sexist ones themselves.
once again look up the term benevolent sexism.
I don't need to look it up, because it is total and utter bull, go and read what I just posted where in my post did I even imply which parent was violent, don't bring psychobabble into an argument when you can't read, I'm in no-way sexist, I've spent 6 years being a stay at home father while my fiance went and finished her education... please don't even start, I never even used the word sexist ANYWHERE so why people seem to keep touting it is beyond me INTERGENDE violence is wrong for quite a few reason, but physcially evolution and inherant sexism(as in woman stay home many do labour...) has caused a natural distinction between the human sex's.
Sorry but you're not even close to anything about me kid, you really have NO idea of anything in the real world for instance, "this mentality often breeds domestic violence because once again women are not allowed to step outside their roles but since the door is opened for them and they are treated" i can only presume by 'this mentality' you mean my saying intergender violence is wrong, that somehow that would lead to me being disheartened by my partners independence... which as you can see I'm not, but it could promote the opposite form of domestic violence, where women hit men, which is also happens but isn't covered by the media, mainly because due to social stigma a man won't admit it, because people would laugh at him, but yeah you know exactly what you're on about.
Nature has drawn certain lines, thats why male atheletes records in track and field out do females and why women and men don't compete in pro sports, it's not sexism it's the facts of nature.
But you know keep dictating that I'm sexist and keep thinking that domestic violence isn't learnt behaviour, my father did beat my mother, you know why because my grandmother beat my grandfather in the 1950s, once over he came home (my dad) to find his house flooded, and my nana and her sister trying to drown my grandfather in the flood water... my father also had anger management problems, but learnt behaviour and him thinking "well i'd never let happen to me" also played a major role, don't try and analyze me kid, you'll come up short.
---
PSN: Spykefreaky GT: Spyke Freaky - Suppaman234 a real trustworthy Gamefaqer
My setup http://s223.photobucket.com/albums/dd221/spykeK/Setup - Jan 30, 2013 7:09 am GMTboredofyou posted...
*shrugs*
I'm still holding the same position. You should be allowed to do all that TC. Anyone who doesn't want that in their game, don't set it up that way.
As far as the business angle goes.. If the object of the game is to get money then making your game appeal to as many folks as possible should be the obvious choice.
To the poster who complained about a possible like to domestic violence..
I'm sorry you went through that.
Please consider that a person who perpetrates those acts does not do so because they watched it in a game. That person does it because of a lack of personal self control.
Are we really going to have the whole do kids copy what they see debate? if things are enforced as being OK, then they become OK, I know violent people, very violent people, my first name for instance is Albert and I'm named after my fathers first cousin and best friend, now this man when he was 20 he went into a chip shop in manchester with my father who was 16, he was 5'0 and my dad 5'6, 3 men came in and pushed them about gave them a slap the men were all 6 foot plus, so my uncle Albert said "wait here I'll be back in a minute" thinking he was going to get a third man, they waited, he returned with a kitchen knife, stabbed all 3, killed one seriously injured another and paralysed the third.
Thats a true story, but this man is one of my heroes not for that story for the following, before I was born, my Dad gripped my mother in front of him, and My Uncle walked over to my father and said "Norman I'll tell you this once, if you EVER lay a finger on her in front of me I will chop off your F'in hands." so no sorry I find it quite hard to accept that it was a lack of personal self control, my father had that, he let my mother go, he also never seemed to pick a fight with men in alot of situations, infact he'd hold back his anger and then crack my mother when they got home. Do not fool yourself into thinking that it's simply a lack of control, it isn't with everyone, it was to an extent but he had it elsewhere.
I'm through trudging all this up, because people want to be able to "compete" with women vs men, it's not happening get over it, you're arguments are all sub-par at best.
---
PSN: Spykefreaky GT: Spyke Freaky - Suppaman234 a real trustworthy Gamefaqer
My setup http://s223.photobucket.com/albums/dd221/spykeK/Setup - Jan 30, 2013 8:31 am GMTspikefreaky posted...
I don't need to look it up, because it is total and utter bull, go and read what I just posted where in my post did I even imply which parent was violent, don't bring psychobabble into an argument when you can't read, I'm in no-way sexist, I've spent 6 years being a stay at home father while my fiance went and finished her education... please don't even start, I never even used the word sexist ANYWHERE so why people seem to keep touting it is beyond me INTERGENDE violence is wrong for quite a few reason, but physcially evolution and inherant sexism(as in woman stay home many do labour...) has caused a natural distinction between the human sex's.
Sorry but you're not even close to anything about me kid, you really have NO idea of anything in the real world for instance, "this mentality often breeds domestic violence because once again women are not allowed to step outside their roles but since the door is opened for them and they are treated" i can only presume by 'this mentality' you mean my saying intergender violence is wrong, that somehow that would lead to me being disheartened by my partners independence... which as you can see I'm not, but it could promote the opposite form of domestic violence, where women hit men, which is also happens but isn't covered by the media, mainly because due to social stigma a man won't admit it, because people would laugh at him, but yeah you know exactly what you're on about.
Nature has drawn certain lines, thats why male atheletes records in track and field out do females and why women and men don't compete in pro sports, it's not sexism it's the facts of nature.
But you know keep dictating that I'm sexist and keep thinking that domestic violence isn't learnt behaviour, my father did beat my mother, you know why because my grandmother beat my grandfather in the 1950s, once over he came home (my dad) to find his house flooded, and my nana and her sister trying to drown my grandfather in the flood water... my father also had anger management problems, but learnt behaviour and him thinking "well i'd never let happen to me" also played a major role, don't try and analyze me kid, you'll come up short.
so you refuse to look up a term because you are certain that it is BS? way to be open minded and way to want to educate yourself. i can see conversation with you is futile. you are utterly stuck in your ways.
and FYI just because you stay at home so your wife can work or go to school does not mean you are not sexist or a wife beater. plenty of those kinds of people have working wives. that literally proves nothing.
in fact your entire argument proves nothing.
also "nature has drawn certain lines"....ok no nature has drawn 0 lines pal.
but unless you want to educate yourself on what benevolent sexism is there is no point in farther talking to you. those that oppose equal rights are sexists. this game is against equal rights under the guise of "women can't compete with men its not fair or men shouldn't hit women". see thats the thing that MAKES YOU SEXIST because you don''t treat the sexes equally. thats the very definition of it. the benevolent part is how you do it why making it sound like you care. the fact your family has a history of domestic violence gives you a higher chance of repeating that act so i can't say im shocked by your attitude.
the argument should be violence is wrong NOT intergender violence. just violence. sort of how hate crimes shouldnt be the crime but the actual crime should be the crime. - Jan 30, 2013 8:42 am GMTok close this topic...
- Jan 30, 2013 9:19 am GMTkayoticdreamz posted...
so you refuse to look up a term because you are certain that it is BS? way to be open minded and way to want to educate yourself. i can see conversation with you is futile. you are utterly stuck in your ways.
and FYI just because you stay at home so your wife can work or go to school does not mean you are not sexist or a wife beater. plenty of those kinds of people have working wives. that literally proves nothing.
in fact your entire argument proves nothing.
also "nature has drawn certain lines"....ok no nature has drawn 0 lines pal.
but unless you want to educate yourself on what benevolent sexism is there is no point in farther talking to you. those that oppose equal rights are sexists. this game is against equal rights under the guise of "women can't compete with men its not fair or men shouldn't hit women". see thats the thing that MAKES YOU SEXIST because you don''t treat the sexes equally. thats the very definition of it. the benevolent part is how you do it why making it sound like you care. the fact your family has a history of domestic violence gives you a higher chance of repeating that act so i can't say im shocked by your attitude.
the argument should be violence is wrong NOT intergender violence. just violence. sort of how hate crimes shouldnt be the crime but the actual crime should be the crime.
I actually already know the meaning thus my calling it total BS. So Debate the points I made on why are women:
on average 3-4 inches shorter than males.
on average smaller framed than males.
on average in need of less Kcals a day than males.
In general better at languages than males.
In general worse at spatial awareness than males.
if nature has drawn no lines... you're acting uneducated, I dispelled your assumptions of me already with the points I made YOU'RE the one being unneccesarily judgemental and pretty much trying to say I made statements I never did, violence IS learnt behaviour I made that pretty clear so yes if you're not educated about it it will repeat.
I also already made the statement that Violence (of any kind) is disgusting so yeah you're way off on that point, my attitude is fine, I'm strongly against violence, so maybe you should actually learn to debate a point and not just pull silly assumptions out of thin air?
---
PSN: Spykefreaky GT: Spyke Freaky - Suppaman234 a real trustworthy Gamefaqer
My setup http://s223.photobucket.com/albums/dd221/spykeK/Setup - Jan 30, 2013 9:40 am GMTAnd to add Benevolant Sexism is a Psychological THEORY, thus my dispelling it, infact if i remember correctly it's part of a bigger theory called ambivolant sexism...
and it doesn't even try to tackle the physical/natural and evolutionary differences between the sexes which is my whole argument and THEREFORE you're point is nullified completly.
---
PSN: Spykefreaky GT: Spyke Freaky - Suppaman234 a real trustworthy Gamefaqer
My setup http://s223.photobucket.com/albums/dd221/spykeK/Setup - Jan 30, 2013 2:24 pm GMT[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
- Jan 30, 2013 2:50 pm GMTspikefreaky posted...
Please, grow a brain, I'm sexist, wrestling isn't competition girl... do they allow intergender competition in boxing?
We're not talking about boxing.
spikefreaky posted...pro wrestling is not a competition, also please don't bring CZW into any argument, it makes you seem rather simple.
There's still plenty of competition, even if it's not "real". Dismissing a popular indie makes you seem the simple one. CZW is ranked maybe fourth or fifth in North America. It's legit, it's entertaining, and it's run by people who recognize actual talent. That's the opposite of what WWE does.
spikefreaky posted...Nature has not given women equal footing with men, BLAH BLAH BLAH
No, that doesn't mean endorsing domestic violence, it means endorsing that women can do just about anything men can do and vice versa.
spikefreaky posted...nothing I say is going to change your arrogant pro-feminst way of thinking - and that word doesn't mean man and women equals it means women crushing men, as shown by you're reasonings of "A woman destroying cena" Feminists want to oppress males, I've got no problem with equality, where applicable.
You don't wanna get in a political debate with me, kiddo. That said, it has nothing to do with wanting to oppress men, though after 2000 years of oppression from men... well, you do the math. As for me wanting to destroy Cena with a female CAW, it's not because he's a man, it's because CENA SUCKS. I destroy useless divas, too.
spikefreaky posted...However maybe before you go spouting this total crap answer me this why are women:
on average 3-4 inches shorter than males.
on average smaller framed than males.
on average in need of less Kcals a day than males.
In general better at languages than males.
In general worse at spatial awareness than males.
1-3 are irrelevant. 4 is irrelevant but wrong (see here: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=are-women-really-better-with-language). 5 is also irrelevant and ignores all the things women are better at, like multitasking, life span, smell, and peripheral vision. The point is, yes, there are some differences, but you can't just talk about the advantages men have without discussing advantages women have.
You know what's more important than all of the above? Skill and determination. What you are talking about may go for the average or even a majority, but not for 100%. For that reason alone, men and women should be treated as equals and allowed to do all the same things. If a woman can cut it (Mariko Yoshida, LuFisto, Cheerleader Melissa, Sarah Stock, etc.) then great, if not (most WWE divas), cut them.
As to you being smarter than me and such... LOL.
I'm arrogant and less intelligent because I feel entitled to equal treatment? Screw you. By the way, I'm a member of MENSA, so I highly doubt you're smarter than me, but nice try.
---
Spread the joy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2-TGUlwu4 - Jan 30, 2013 2:51 pm GMTspikefreaky posted...
And to add Benevolant Sexism is a Psychological THEORY, thus my dispelling it, infact if i remember correctly it's part of a bigger theory called ambivolant sexism...
and it doesn't even try to tackle the physical/natural and evolutionary differences between the sexes which is my whole argument and THEREFORE you're point is nullified completly.
Debate doesn't work like that. Sorry.
---
Spread the joy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2-TGUlwu4 - Jan 30, 2013 4:25 pm GMTPerhaps I'm not being clear. By saying lack of self control, I mean choosing to commit an act of violence.
This is a choice. All the media sensationalism in the world does not change the fact that a person chooses to commit violence.
The kids do what they see debate is dead on arrival as the actual act of violence comes down to personal choice. Further, the game has a teen rating. "Kids" aren't even supposed to be playing it.
I know, a rating on a box stops nobody.. But the point is ( if I'm reading correct meaning from the TC's first post) if a game already contains blood, crude humor, mild language, mild suggestive themes, use of alcohol and violence (quoted from the box) then why not add the elements she is seeking. They clearly fall under the covered categories.
I agree. In my opinion, they do.
---
If you fell for it, it isn't cheap. It is just something that works on you. Adapt.. Or curl up in the fetal position, your call. - Jan 30, 2013 4:32 pm GMTPh'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
- Jan 31, 2013 5:13 am GMTStop trying to turn a simple wrestling game into a jumping point for your pro-gay movement platform.
---
PSN - DuckySolo
Playing: WWE 13 / On-Deck: COD:BLOPS2 - Feb 1, 2013 2:07 am GMTcediebold posted...
Stop trying to turn a simple wrestling game into a jumping point for your pro-gay movement platform.
Make me.
As I am perturbed at the extreme anti-women and anti-gay crap in a game I payed a lot of money for, I will complain as much as I like.
---
Spread the joy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2-TGUlwu4 - Feb 1, 2013 7:07 am GMTcediebold posted...
Stop trying to turn a simple wrestling game into a jumping point for your pro-gay movement platform.
You could say the exact same thing about Yukes, THQ, and/or WWE. Wrestling has always been a hodge podge of things put together, like a 3 ring circus. Something in it for everyone generally, so who are they to censor elements like homosexuality or intergender matches. They even removed your ability to do wholesome girl on girl action on the story editor. Has to be male, female now.
This isn't just for the kissing scenes either, its for other scenes where you could justify using 2 men or 2 women for story sake.
Its even more hypocritical when WWE has had a history of using said elements.
Like Chyna winning the IC title.
Kharma in the Rumble
Gold Dust
Bill and Chuck
Adorable Adrian Adonis
Mickie James yearnings for Trish Stratus
Pat Patterson, Vince Mcmahon, Brooklyn Brawler and Shawn Micheals.....etc, etc, etc.
The point being it should be up to the person playing the game how pervy or politically correct they want it to be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQc9zxLqrhE
---
Mug Root Beer? I'm not thirsty enough to resort to violence, yet....
KenpoKid69, Yugioh In-game Name: Kate-O FC: 352527548010 - Feb 1, 2013 7:15 am GMTI wasn't intending to post in this lulz-worthy topic again but when I saw TC said s/he was a member of Mensa, I couldn't resist.
If you're so intelligent, why are you arguing about trivial things on a gaming forum? Explain that. Either you're a troll or just feel the need to go around boasting to others how "smart" you are because you're insecure about other things eh?
---
PSN: CaptainJeff87 (please say Gfaqs in friend request msg) - Feb 1, 2013 12:18 pm GMTDreamGoddess1 posted...
cediebold posted...
Stop trying to turn a simple wrestling game into a jumping point for your pro-gay movement platform.
Make me.
As I am perturbed at the extreme anti-women and anti-gay crap in a game I payed a lot of money for, I will complain as much as I like.
THQ didn't create the game for what you're doing. You didn't pay $60 to "have the right" to call apples oranges - you paid $60 to play wrestling. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Get on that My Little Pony game and shut your mouth.
---
PSN - DuckySolo
Playing: WWE 13 / On-Deck: COD:BLOPS2 - Feb 1, 2013 4:29 pm GMTcaptainjeff87 posted...
I wasn't intending to post in this lulz-worthy topic again but when I saw TC said s/he was a member of Mensa, I couldn't resist.
If you're so intelligent, why are you arguing about trivial things on a gaming forum? Explain that. Either you're a troll or just feel the need to go around boasting to others how "smart" you are because you're insecure about other things eh?
It's called venting.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vent
Venting as per the intransitive verb.
I only mentioned my credentials once you called them into question by proclaiming yourself smarter than me based solely on your opposition to me, despite your claim to the contrary. I can see through your nonsense. You're the one that brought intellect into the discussion.
cediebold posted...THQ didn't create the game for what you're doing. You didn't pay $60 to "have the right" to call apples oranges - you paid $60 to play wrestling. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Get on that My Little Pony game and shut your mouth.
I had no way of knowing these things before buying the game, and you can't return the game once it's opened and played. Even though I saw the game played for me before buying it, "testing to see if men could wrestle women" and "testing to see if there were character limits in storylines" simply didn't occur to me. As games progress, logic dictates that you add features rather than take them away. As men could face women in exhibition matches and for custom titles in the last WWE game I played by the same company, I naturally assumed that said feature would not be so blatantly removed by the addition of extra code just to make the game's women worthless. Never even occured to me. In addition, given things that WWE has done in the past, it did not for one second occur to me that they would put limitations in place to stop any gay couples from forming. It defies logic, so I didn't think it would happen. Most things I have read about the game stated that you could do, and I quote, "anything" in this game.
So I bought the game, without the ability or even the foresight to test things that common sense and logic would dictate would be there since they were there before, and was upset with some of the features they blatantly coded in to promote their misogynist and homophobic agenda.
I get very angry very easily, despite my intelligence. I have a short fuse and explosive temper. As there are no competing games with similar technology for wrestling, this game has a monopoly on the pro wrestling games market.
Your own misogyny is also apparent, as you believe that I should go get on some stupid My Little Pony game. Now common sense tells me you said that to me because I'm a woman in what is clearly a man's world. You have no credibility. I wanted a fully customizable wrestling game, as this was pretty much advertised to be. I feel very angry that I didn't get what I paid for.
---
Spread the joy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2-TGUlwu4 - Feb 2, 2013 9:32 am GMTI wanted a fully customizable wrestling game, as this was pretty much advertised to be. I feel very angry that I didn't get what I paid for.
Except you did. They advertised a fully customizable wrestling game, and you got a fully customizable wrestling game. Correct me if I'm wrong, and I will gladly apologize and retract my statement if I am, but I don't remember any trailer for the game that promoted the ability to make your little lesbian soap opera or erotic fanfic. It's a wrestling game, not a platform to promote an agenda or a way for some freak to get their rocks off to pixel people making out. I truly feel sorry for you if a kiss cutscene is the deciding factor in whether or not you would spend $60 on a sports game. - Feb 2, 2013 12:54 pm GMTDODV posted...
I wanted a fully customizable wrestling game, as this was pretty much advertised to be. I feel very angry that I didn't get what I paid for.
Except you did. They advertised a fully customizable wrestling game, and you got a fully customizable wrestling game. Correct me if I'm wrong, and I will gladly apologize and retract my statement if I am, but I don't remember any trailer for the game that promoted the ability to make your little lesbian soap opera or erotic fanfic.
Well, that depends on your definition of "fully customizable".
Because I could have sworn that they told us that we could do whatever we wanted with it.
Using your definition, that's false advertising, which is punishable by law.
---
If you loved the old GOOD wrestling games, give support:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/920076-wwe-day-of-reckoning - Feb 2, 2013 4:06 pm GMTDODV posted...
Except you did. They advertised a fully customizable wrestling game, and you got a fully customizable wrestling game. Correct me if I'm wrong, and I will gladly apologize and retract my statement if I am, but I don't remember any trailer for the game that promoted the ability to make your little lesbian soap opera or erotic fanfic. It's a wrestling game, not a platform to promote an agenda or a way for some freak to get their rocks off to pixel people making out. I truly feel sorry for you if a kiss cutscene is the deciding factor in whether or not you would spend $60 on a sports game.
Wrestling is a soap opera. It's a soap opera with great fights, even in the great promotions. SHIMMER has drama. The old NWA had tons of drama. WCW had drama. TNA has drama. ROH has drama. WWE used to have better drama. In fact, they've done before exactly what I want to do now. I'm a wrestling fan first, but I also enjoy good storylines.
It's not the only deciding factor, though. The fact that you can't make any match you want, but that extra programming was added to prevent women from fighting men, is a big freaking deal. If I wanted to have a storyline where two women start fighting off a bunch of men, hook up romantically, and then take over the tag team division and kick rears all over the place, that should be a valid option. That's what the storyline basically was.
The whole "kissing scene" thing irks me because it's already in the game. You can't criticize me for complaining about limits on a feature that's already in the dang game. There is a "kissing scene", and they specifically added programming in forcing that it be a superstar and a diva and not two of either. If there was no "kissing scene" option to begin with, I wouldn't be complaining about this really. That's not the case. It's in the game and they specifically limit you to a heterosexual pairing. So your point is completely invalid.
In addition, how would me playing this storyline in the privacy of my own home with my partner (yes, I'm a lesbian, and yes, I'm in a civil union), that's for us. I'm venting on here because I'm ticked off that they're blatantly homophobic in this matter.
The no-gays thing, the no men fighting women thing, it really angers me. I did not get what I paid for, what was advertised.
BigJon1448 posted...Well, that depends on your definition of "fully customizable".
Because I could have sworn that they told us that we could do whatever we wanted with it.
Using your definition, that's false advertising, which is punishable by law.
Exactly my point! If they hadn't added extra programming to prevent all this stuff, removing features that were previously established, I never would have posted these complaints.
---
Spread the joy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2-TGUlwu4
Game Stats
- Game Universe:
- WWF Raw (XBOX, 32X, GB, GG, SNES, GEN),
- WWE Crush Hour (GC, XBOX, PS2),
- WWF Royal Rumble (GEN, SNES, DC),
- WWF War Zone (N64, PS, GB),
- WWF Attitude (DC, GBC, N64, PS),
- WWF European Rampage Tour (AMI, C64),
- WWF In Your House (PC, PS, SAT),
- WWF Super Wrestlemania (GEN, SNES),
- WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006 (PSP, PS2),
- WWF King of the Ring (GB, NES)
- 16+ Rating Description
WWE '13 Navigation
Games You May Like

All Star Pro-Wrestling (PS2)
WCW Mayhem (PS)
WCW Nitro (PC)
WWF SmackDown! (PS)
WWF Raw (XBOX)
Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.


